IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v395y2026ics0277953626001693.html

Political trust and health compliance during a health crisis: A systematic literature review from the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Goren, Talia
  • Vashdi, Dana R.
  • Beeri, Itai

Abstract

Political trust is considered crucial for enhancing civic compliance with government policies and instructions, particularly during a health crisis. However, evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic, a major global health crisis, suggest a more nuanced relationship. Aiming to explore and clarify the nature of and the conditions for the political trust and civic compliance relationship in the context of a health crisis in the general population, at the overall societal-level, this study systematically reviews relevant literature from the COVID-19 pandemic, across 62 countries. Our findings indicate that the positive relationship between political trust and compliance is not self-evident, as 42% of the reviewed studies (63 of 151) report non-significant, mixed or negative results. Moreover, conceptual and methodological features seem to affect the likelihood of this association, such as the object of trust and compliance behavior, the behavior's execution timeframe and its legal status, and the manner in which political trust and compliance are measured. Potential consequences are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Goren, Talia & Vashdi, Dana R. & Beeri, Itai, 2026. "Political trust and health compliance during a health crisis: A systematic literature review from the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 395(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:395:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626001693
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953626001693
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:395:y:2026:i:c:s0277953626001693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.