Author
Listed:
- Elizabeth K Kirkwood
- Jasmin Khan
- Mohammad Mehedi Hasan
- Afrin Iqbal
- Tazeen Tahsina
- Tanvir Huda
- John Frederick Hoddinott
- Tracey Lea Laba
- Sumithra Muthayya
- Nicholas Goodwin
- Munirul Islam
- Emwinyore Agho Kingsley
- Shams E Arifeen
- Michael J Dibley
- Neeloy Ashraful Alam
Abstract
A key element of women’s empowerment is the ability to participate in household decision-making. This study presents the qualitative results from the Shonjibon Cash and Counselling Trial baseline process evaluation with the aim of exploring the status of women’s decision-making at the trial’s outset and to facilitate the exploration of any changes in women’s empowerment over the course of the trial. Between January and March 2021, we conducted forty-one in-depth interviews with pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. The research team translated, transcribed, coded, and discussed the interviews. We used thematic analysis to examine women’s experience and perceptions on household decision-making. The key findings that emerged; women jointly participated in financial decision-making with their husbands; men made the final decision regarding seeking healthcare, and women solely made choices regarding infant and young child feeding. Our findings revealed that women felt that they needed to discuss their plans to go outside the house with their husbands, many perceived a lack of importance in the community towards women’s participation in decision-making. This study documents current contextual information on the status of women’s involvement in household decision-making and intrahousehold power dynamics at the start of the Shonjibon Cash and Counselling Trial.
Suggested Citation
Elizabeth K Kirkwood & Jasmin Khan & Mohammad Mehedi Hasan & Afrin Iqbal & Tazeen Tahsina & Tanvir Huda & John Frederick Hoddinott & Tracey Lea Laba & Sumithra Muthayya & Nicholas Goodwin & Munirul Is, 2024.
"Women’s participation in household decision-making: Qualitative findings from the Shonjibon Trial in rural Bangladesh,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-14, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002907
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002907
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0002907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.