IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A spectrum of routing strategies for brain networks

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger
  • Xiaoran Yan
  • Artemy Kolchinsky
  • Martijn P van den Heuvel
  • Patric Hagmann
  • Olaf Sporns

Abstract

Communication of signals among nodes in a complex network poses fundamental problems of efficiency and cost. Routing of messages along shortest paths requires global information about the topology, while spreading by diffusion, which operates according to local topological features, is informationally “cheap” but inefficient. We introduce a stochastic model for network communication that combines local and global information about the network topology to generate biased random walks on the network. The model generates a continuous spectrum of dynamics that converge onto shortest-path and random-walk (diffusion) communication processes at the limiting extremes. We implement the model on two cohorts of human connectome networks and investigate the effects of varying the global information bias on the network’s communication cost. We identify routing strategies that approach a (highly efficient) shortest-path communication process with a relatively small global information bias on the system’s dynamics. Moreover, we show that the cost of routing messages from and to hub nodes varies as a function of the global information bias driving the system’s dynamics. Finally, we implement the model to identify individual subject differences from a communication dynamics point of view. The present framework departs from the classical shortest paths vs. diffusion dichotomy, unifying both models under a single family of dynamical processes that differ by the extent to which global information about the network topology influences the routing patterns of neural signals traversing the network.Author summary: Brain network communication is typically approached from the perspective of the length of inferred paths and the cost of building and maintaining network connections. However, these analyses often disregard the dynamical processes taking place on the network and the additional costs that these processes incur. Here, we introduce a framework to study communication-cost trade-offs on a broad range of communication processes modeled as biased random walks. We control the system’s dynamics that dictates the flow of messages traversing a network by biasing node’s routing strategies with different degrees of “knowledge” about the topology of the network. On the human connectome, this framework uncovers a spectrum of dynamic communication processes, some of which can achieve efficient routing strategies at low informational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger & Xiaoran Yan & Artemy Kolchinsky & Martijn P van den Heuvel & Patric Hagmann & Olaf Sporns, 2019. "A spectrum of routing strategies for brain networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006833
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark D Humphries & Kevin Gurney, 2008. "Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Jon M. Kleinberg, 2000. "Navigation in a small world," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 845-845, August.
    3. V. Zlatic & G. Bianconi & A. Díaz-Guilera & D. Garlaschelli & F. Rao & G. Caldarelli, 2009. "On the rich-club effect in dense and weighted networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 271-275, February.
    4. Simas, Tiago & Rocha, Luis M., 2015. "Distance closures on complex networks," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 227-268, June.
    5. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2003. "Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 622-642.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani & Joshua Faskowitz & Jonah Slack & Bratislav Mišić & Richard F. Betzel, 2022. "Local structure-function relationships in human brain networks across the lifespan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Antoine Allard & M Ángeles Serrano, 2020. "Navigable maps of structural brain networks across species," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jalili, Mahdi, 2011. "Error and attack tolerance of small-worldness in complex networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 422-430.
    2. Weiwei Yan & Xin Wen & Yin Zhang & Sonali Kudva & Qian Liu, 2023. "The dynamics of Q&A in academic social networking sites: insights from participants, interaction network, response time, and discipline differences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1895-1922, March.
    3. Àlex Arenas & Antonio Cabrales & Leon Danon & Albert Díaz-Guilera & Roger Guimerà & Fernando Vega-Redondo, 2010. "Optimal information transmission in organizations: search and congestion," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 75-93, March.
    4. Boris Salazar & María del Pilar Castillo, 2008. "Pobreza Urbana Y Exclusión Social De Los Desplazados," Documentos de Trabajo 4500, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE.
    5. Blagus, Neli & Šubelj, Lovro & Bajec, Marko, 2012. "Self-similar scaling of density in complex real-world networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(8), pages 2794-2802.
    6. Douglas R. White & Jason Owen-Smith & James Moody & Walter W. Powell, 2004. "Networks, Fields and Organizations: Micro-Dynamics, Scale and Cohesive Embeddings," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 95-117, May.
    7. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.
    8. Cowan, Robin & Jonard, Nicolas & Sanditov, Bulat, 2009. "Fits and Misfits: Technological Matching and R&D Networks," MERIT Working Papers 2009-042, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Amos Korman & Efrat Greenwald & Ofer Feinerman, 2014. "Confidence Sharing: An Economic Strategy for Efficient Information Flows in Animal Groups," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    10. Trpevski, Daniel & Smilkov, Daniel & Mishkovski, Igor & Kocarev, Ljupco, 2010. "Vulnerability of labeled networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(23), pages 5538-5549.
    11. Mark D Humphries & Javier A Caballero & Mat Evans & Silvia Maggi & Abhinav Singh, 2021. "Spectral estimation for detecting low-dimensional structure in networks using arbitrary null models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Kyu-Min Lee & Jae-Suk Yang & Gunn Kim & Jaesung Lee & Kwang-Il Goh & In-mook Kim, 2011. "Impact of the Topology of Global Macroeconomic Network on the Spreading of Economic Crises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Shi, Xiaolin & Adamic, Lada A. & Strauss, Martin J., 2007. "Networks of strong ties," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 378(1), pages 33-47.
    14. Peter Biddle & Paul England & Marcus Peinado & Bryan Willman, 2003. "The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000636, David K. Levine.
    15. Zhao, Jianyu & Wei, Jiang & Yu, Lean & Xi, Xi, 2022. "Robustness of knowledge networks under targeted attacks: Electric vehicle field of China evidence," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 367-382.
    16. Fabio Della Rossa & Lorenzo Giannini & Pietro DeLellis, 2020. "Herding or wisdom of the crowd? Controlling efficiency in a partially rational financial market," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Henriet, Fanny & Hallegatte, Stéphane & Tabourier, Lionel, 2012. "Firm-network characteristics and economic robustness to natural disasters," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 150-167.
    18. Joost Berkhout & Bernd F. Heidergott, 2019. "Analysis of Markov Influence Graphs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 892-904, May.
    19. Viljoen, Nadia M. & Joubert, Johan W., 2016. "The vulnerability of the global container shipping network to targeted link disruption," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 396-409.
    20. Kondor, Dániel & Mátray, Péter & Csabai, István & Vattay, Gábor, 2013. "Measuring the dimension of partially embedded networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(18), pages 4160-4171.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.