IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A spectrum of routing strategies for brain networks

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger
  • Xiaoran Yan
  • Artemy Kolchinsky
  • Martijn P van den Heuvel
  • Patric Hagmann
  • Olaf Sporns

Abstract

Communication of signals among nodes in a complex network poses fundamental problems of efficiency and cost. Routing of messages along shortest paths requires global information about the topology, while spreading by diffusion, which operates according to local topological features, is informationally “cheap” but inefficient. We introduce a stochastic model for network communication that combines local and global information about the network topology to generate biased random walks on the network. The model generates a continuous spectrum of dynamics that converge onto shortest-path and random-walk (diffusion) communication processes at the limiting extremes. We implement the model on two cohorts of human connectome networks and investigate the effects of varying the global information bias on the network’s communication cost. We identify routing strategies that approach a (highly efficient) shortest-path communication process with a relatively small global information bias on the system’s dynamics. Moreover, we show that the cost of routing messages from and to hub nodes varies as a function of the global information bias driving the system’s dynamics. Finally, we implement the model to identify individual subject differences from a communication dynamics point of view. The present framework departs from the classical shortest paths vs. diffusion dichotomy, unifying both models under a single family of dynamical processes that differ by the extent to which global information about the network topology influences the routing patterns of neural signals traversing the network.Author summary: Brain network communication is typically approached from the perspective of the length of inferred paths and the cost of building and maintaining network connections. However, these analyses often disregard the dynamical processes taking place on the network and the additional costs that these processes incur. Here, we introduce a framework to study communication-cost trade-offs on a broad range of communication processes modeled as biased random walks. We control the system’s dynamics that dictates the flow of messages traversing a network by biasing node’s routing strategies with different degrees of “knowledge” about the topology of the network. On the human connectome, this framework uncovers a spectrum of dynamic communication processes, some of which can achieve efficient routing strategies at low informational cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger & Xiaoran Yan & Artemy Kolchinsky & Martijn P van den Heuvel & Patric Hagmann & Olaf Sporns, 2019. "A spectrum of routing strategies for brain networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006833
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006833?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark D Humphries & Kevin Gurney, 2008. "Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Jon M. Kleinberg, 2000. "Navigation in a small world," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 845-845, August.
    3. V. Zlatic & G. Bianconi & A. Díaz-Guilera & D. Garlaschelli & F. Rao & G. Caldarelli, 2009. "On the rich-club effect in dense and weighted networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 67(3), pages 271-275, February.
    4. Simas, Tiago & Rocha, Luis M., 2015. "Distance closures on complex networks," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 227-268, June.
    5. Crucitti, Paolo & Latora, Vito & Marchiori, Massimo & Rapisarda, Andrea, 2003. "Efficiency of scale-free networks: error and attack tolerance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 622-642.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani & Joshua Faskowitz & Jonah Slack & Bratislav Mišić & Richard F. Betzel, 2022. "Local structure-function relationships in human brain networks across the lifespan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Antoine Allard & M Ángeles Serrano, 2020. "Navigable maps of structural brain networks across species," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jalili, Mahdi, 2011. "Error and attack tolerance of small-worldness in complex networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 422-430.
    2. Weiwei Yan & Xin Wen & Yin Zhang & Sonali Kudva & Qian Liu, 2023. "The dynamics of Q&A in academic social networking sites: insights from participants, interaction network, response time, and discipline differences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1895-1922, March.
    3. Zhou, Yaoming & Wang, Junwei, 2018. "Efficiency of complex networks under failures and attacks: A percolation approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 658-664.
    4. Mark D Humphries & Javier A Caballero & Mat Evans & Silvia Maggi & Abhinav Singh, 2021. "Spectral estimation for detecting low-dimensional structure in networks using arbitrary null models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, July.
    5. Peter Biddle & Paul England & Marcus Peinado & Bryan Willman, 2003. "The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000636, David K. Levine.
    6. Henriet, Fanny & Hallegatte, Stéphane & Tabourier, Lionel, 2012. "Firm-network characteristics and economic robustness to natural disasters," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 150-167.
    7. Joost Berkhout & Bernd F. Heidergott, 2019. "Analysis of Markov Influence Graphs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 892-904, May.
    8. Viljoen, Nadia M. & Joubert, Johan W., 2016. "The vulnerability of the global container shipping network to targeted link disruption," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 396-409.
    9. Kondor, Dániel & Mátray, Péter & Csabai, István & Vattay, Gábor, 2013. "Measuring the dimension of partially embedded networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(18), pages 4160-4171.
    10. Khalid Bakhshaliyev & Mehmet Hadi Gunes, 2020. "Generation of 2-mode scale-free graphs for link-level internet topology modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, November.
    11. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    12. Nicolas Jonard & R. Cowan & B. Sanditov, 2009. "Fits and Misfits : Technological Matching and R & D Networks," DEM Discussion Paper Series 09-12, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    13. César Yajure & Darihelen Montilla & Jose Emmanuel Ramirez-Marquez & Claudio M Rocco S, 2013. "Network vulnerability assessment via bi-objective optimization with a fragmentation approach as proxy," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(6), pages 576-585, December.
    14. Àlex Arenas & Antonio Cabrales & Leon Danon & Albert Díaz-Guilera & Roger Guimerà & Fernando Vega-Redondo, 2010. "Optimal information transmission in organizations: search and congestion," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 14(1), pages 75-93, March.
    15. Abbasiharofteh, Milad & Kogler, Dieter F. & Lengyel, Balázs, 2023. "Atypical combinations of technologies in regional co-inventor networks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(10), pages 1-1.
    16. Yury A Malkov & Alexander Ponomarenko, 2016. "Growing Homophilic Networks Are Natural Navigable Small Worlds," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Lu, Zhe-Ming & Guo, Shi-Ze, 2012. "A small-world network derived from the deterministic uniform recursive tree," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(1), pages 87-92.
    18. Maria C. Mariani & William Kubin & Peter K. Asante & Osei K. Tweneboah & Maria P. Beccar-Varela & Sebastian Jaroszewicz & Hector Gonzalez-Huizar, 2020. "Self-Similar Models: Relationship between the Diffusion Entropy Analysis, Detrended Fluctuation Analysis and Lévy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-20, June.
    19. P.B., Divya & Lekha, Divya Sindhu & Johnson, T.P. & Balakrishnan, Kannan, 2022. "Vulnerability of link-weighted complex networks in central attacks and fallback strategy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 590(C).
    20. Yingying Xing & Jian Lu & Shengdi Chen & Sunanda Dissanayake, 2017. "Vulnerability analysis of urban rail transit based on complex network theory: a case study of Shanghai Metro," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 501-525, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.