IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v62y2023i4p539-551.html

Policy Impacts on Comparative Advantage and Production Protection to Cotton and Its Competing Crops in Pakistan (Article)

Author

Listed:
  • Irfan Ahmed Baig

    (MNS University of Agriculture, Multan.)

  • Sami Ullah

    (MNS University of Agriculture, Multan.)

  • Shoaib Nasir

    (MNS University of Agriculture, Multan.)

Abstract

Agriculture, particularly cotton cultivation, holds paramount significance for the economy of Pakistan. The cotton crop shares 0.6 percent of the gross domestic product and contributes 70 percent to the country’s export earnings. Nonetheless, during the last two decades, cotton area and production in the country have declined. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the economic benefits and competitiveness of cotton and its competitive crops under the current set of relevant policies. We have employed a Policy Analysis Matrix to assess the impact of agricultural policies on cotton and its competing crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Irfan Ahmed Baig & Sami Ullah & Shoaib Nasir, 2023. "Policy Impacts on Comparative Advantage and Production Protection to Cotton and Its Competing Crops in Pakistan (Article)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 539-551.
    • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:62:y:2023:i:4:p:539-551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://file.pide.org.pk/pdfpdr/2023/539-551.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kennedy, P. Lynn & Harrison, R. Wes & Piedra, Mario A., 1998. "Analyzing Agribusiness Competitiveness: The Case Of The United States Sugar Industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(2), pages 1-13.
    2. Kannapiran, Chinna A. & Fleming, Euan M., 1999. "Competitiveness And Comparative Advantage Of Tree Crop Smallholdings In Papua New Guinea," Working Papers 12911, University of New England, School of Economics.
    3. Betül Gürer & Berna Türkekul & M. Necat Ören & Canan Abay & Burhan Özalp, 2017. "The Impact of Turkish Agricultural Policy on Competitiveness of Cotton Production," International Journal of Food and Beverage Manufacturing and Business Models (IJFBMBM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 20-30, January.
    4. Suresh, A. & Ramasundaram, P. & Samuel, Josily & Wankhade, Shwetal, . "Cotton Cultivation in India Since the Green Revolution: Technology, Policy, and Performance," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 4(2).
    5. Pahle, Michael & Pachauri, Shonali & Steinbacher, Karoline, 2016. "Can the Green Economy deliver it all? Experiences of renewable energy policies with socio-economic objectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1331-1341.
    6. Mohanty, Samarendu & Fang, Cheng & Chaudhary, Jagadanand, 2003. "Assessing the Competitiveness of Indian Cotton Production: A Policy Analysis Matrix Approach," Cotton Economics Research Institute CER Series 53142, Texas Tech University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. dos Santos Alves, Camila Elisa & Belarmino, Luiz Clovis & Padula, Antonio Domingos, 2017. "Feedstock diversification for biodiesel production in Brazil: Using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM) to evaluate the impact of the PNPB and the economic competitiveness of alternative oilseeds," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 297-309.
    2. Enrico Bergamini & Georg Zachmann, 2020. "Exploring EU’s Regional Potential in Low-Carbon Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-28, December.
    3. Justyna Godawska & Joanna Wyrobek, 2021. "The Impact of Environmental Policy Stringency on Renewable Energy Production in the Visegrad Group Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Fleck, Ann-Katrin & Anatolitis, Vasilios, 2023. "Achieving the objectives of renewable energy policy – Insights from renewable energy auction design in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Ying Qu & Ying Yu & Andrea Appolloni & Mengru Li & Yue Liu, 2017. "Measuring Green Growth Efficiency for Chinese Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Alexey Bilgaev & Suocheng Dong & Fujia Li & Hao Cheng & Arnold Tulohonov & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva, 2020. "Baikal Region (Russia) Development Prospects Based on the Green Economy Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Herrero, Carmen & Pineda, José & Villar, Antonio & Zambrano, Eduardo, 2020. "Tracking progress towards accessible, green and efficient energy: The Inclusive Green Energy index," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Daniel Ştefan Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina, 2017. "Does Renewable Energy Drive Sustainable Economic Growth? Multivariate Panel Data Evidence for EU-28 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    9. Lema, Rasmus & Bhamidipati, Padmasai Lakshmi & Gregersen, Cecilia & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer & Kirchherr, Julian, 2021. "China’s investments in renewable energy in Africa: Creating co-benefits or just cashing-in?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    10. Elzaki, Raga M. & Elrasheed, Mutasim.M.M. & Elmulthum, Nagat A., 2022. "Optimal crop combination under soaring oil and energy prices in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    11. Tomislav Galoviæ & Heri Beziæ, 2019. "The competitiveness of the EU sugar industry," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(1), pages 173-189.
    12. Kurup, Suresh A. & Reddy, A. Amarender & Singh, Dharm Raj & Praveen, K.V, 2021. "Risks in Rainfed Agriculture and Adaptation Strategies in India: Profile and Socio-Economic Correlates," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315127, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Pahle, Michael & Schaeffer, Roberto & Pachauri, Shonali & Eom, Jiyong & Awasthy, Aayushi & Chen, Wenying & Di Maria, Corrado & Jiang, Kejun & He, Chenmin & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Safonov, George & , 2021. "The crucial role of complementarity, transparency and adaptability for designing energy policies for sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    14. Gillson, I & Poulton, Colin & Balcombe, Kelvin & Page, S, 2004. "Understanding the impact of Cotton Subsidies on developing countries," MPRA Paper 15373, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Chao-Chien Chen & Hsiu-Ping Yueh & Chaoyun Liang, 2016. "Strategic Management of Agribusiness: Determinants and Trends," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 69-97.
    16. Yuansheng Huang & Lei Yang & Chong Gao & Yuqing Jiang & Yulin Dong, 2019. "A Novel Prediction Approach for Short-Term Renewable Energy Consumption in China Based on Improved Gaussian Process Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Barbier, Edward B., 2022. "The policy challenges of green rural transformation for Asia-Pacific emerging and developing economies in a post-COVID world," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 689-704.
    18. Barbier, Edward B., 2025. "Greening agriculture for rural development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    19. Sunny, Mahmood Reaz & Kabir, Md Ahsan & Sarker, Md Shakowat Zaman & Aghaloo, Kamaleddin & Ali, Tausif, 2024. "Feasibility study of floating solar photovoltaic systems using techno-economic assessment and multi-criteria decision-making method: A case study of Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    20. Gorton, Matthew & Davidova, Sophia & Banse, Martin & Bailey, Alistair, 2005. "A magyar mezőgazdaság nemzetközi versenyképessége - múltbeli teljesítmény és jövőkép [International competitiveness of Hungarian agriculture: past performance and future projections]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 66-80.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:62:y:2023:i:4:p:539-551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.