IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pch/abante/v4y2001i1p3-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive Feedback Effects Of Brand Extensions: Expanding Brand Meaning And The Range Of Extendibility

Author

Listed:
  • SANDRA J. MILBERG

    (Visiting Associate Professor, Escuela de Administración, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.)

Abstract

The focus of this research is on the positive feedback effects of brand extensions. In particular, this study identifies and examines conditions under which brand extendibility is enhanced by expanding product category associations. This is important as it has been argued that the range of a brand’s extendibility is one measure of brand equity. Thus, developing strategies to modify brand product category associations that stretch brand extension boundaries may increase equity. The results indicate that systematically introducing brand extensions consistent with a broader, more superordinate product category can modify a brand’s product category associations and enhance its ability to accommodate more diverse extensions. More specifically, expansion of a brand’s product category associations and extension boundaries occur when: 1) extensions are perceived to be consistent with the parent brand image and 2) extensions and the current products together become associated with a more abstract, superordinate level product category. Further, under these conditions there is no evidence of adverse affects on either brand attitudes or brand image beliefs. To the contrary, when extensions were perceived to be inconsistent with the brand image or consumers perceived no sensible relationship between current brand products and extensions the brand is adversely affected. Finally, the results demonstrate that using traditional measures of perceived similarity (relatedness) between brand extensions and current parent brand products has important limitations and implications for identifying potential brand extensions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra J. Milberg, 2001. "Positive Feedback Effects Of Brand Extensions: Expanding Brand Meaning And The Range Of Extendibility," Abante, Escuela de Administracion. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 4(1), pages 3-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:pch:abante:v:4:y:2001:i:1:p:3-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.abante.cl/files/ABT/Contenidos/Vol-4-N1/1%20Milberg.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, C Whan & Milberg, Sandra & Lawson, Robert, 1991. "Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(2), pages 185-193, September.
    2. Sujan, Mita & Dekleva, Christine, 1987. "Product Categorization and Inference Making: Some Implications for Comparative Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(3), pages 372-378, December.
    3. Tauber, Edward M., 1981. "Brand franchise extension: New product benefits from existing Brand Names," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 36-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chia-Lin LEE & Reinhold DECKER, 2009. "Modeling The Effect Of Belief Revisions On The Success Of Co-Branding," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(2(8)_ Sum).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bong-Goon Seo & Do-Hyung Park, 2020. "The Effective Type of Information Categorization in Online Curation Service Depending on Psychological Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Jungju Yu, 2021. "A Model of Brand Architecture Choice: A House of Brands vs. A Branded House," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 147-167, January.
    3. Özge Sýðýrcý & A. Müge Yalçýn, 2010. "Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations Of Brand Extensions," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 24(1+2), pages 67-90.
    4. Bhat, Sobodh & Reddy, Srinivas K., 2001. "The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 111-122, September.
    5. Muhammad Shakil AHMAD & Ehtesham ul MUJEEB & Amir RAJPUT, 2011. "Does Brand Extension Impact Parent Brand: A Case Of Johnson, Uk," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 53-66, May.
    6. Nathalie Veg-Sala, 2017. "The impact of stereotyped and non-stereotyped brand genders on cross-gender extension evaluations," Post-Print hal-01735491, HAL.
    7. Kim, Chung K. & Lavack, Anne M. & Smith, Margo, 2001. "Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 211-222, June.
    8. Florence Kremer & Catherine Viot, 2012. "How store brands build retailer brand image," Post-Print hal-01803720, HAL.
    9. Brigitte Muller, 2008. "Consistency between brand image and website image: Does it matter?," Post-Print hal-01796278, HAL.
    10. Soomro, Yasir & Abbas, Sana & Hameed, Irfan & Shakoor, Rehan, 2012. "Consumer evaluation of brand extension: Pakistani Context," MPRA Paper 57416, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Liliya Lozanova, 2016. "To Extend or Not to Extend: Advantages and Disadvantages of Brand Extension Strategy," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 500-514, December.
    12. Durdana Ozretic-Dosen & Marta Brlic & Tanja Komarac, 2018. "Strategic Brand Management In Emerging Markets: Consumer Perceptions Of Brand Extensions," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(1).
    13. Imen Yacoub, 2015. "The Evaluation of Brand Extension: A Proposition of a Conceptual Framework Based on Trust," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 5(10), pages 663-687.
    14. Catherine Viot, 2011. "Can brand identity predict brand extensions' success or failure?," Post-Print hal-01803752, HAL.
    15. Goedertier, Frank & Dawar, Niraj & Geuens, Maggie & Weijters, Bert, 2015. "Brand typicality and distant novel extension acceptance: How risk-reduction counters low category fit," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 157-165.
    16. Un-Kon Lee, 2021. "The Effect of Confirmation of Nation Brand Image in International Tourism Advertisement on Travel Intention of Foreign Tourists: The Case of Korean ITA for Chinese Tourists," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    17. Laurent Cavenaile & Pau Roldan-Blanco, 2021. "Advertising, Innovation, and Economic Growth," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 251-303, July.
    18. Sheng, Shibin & Pan, Yue, 2009. "Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: The role of brand image and bundle features," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 367-376.
    19. Dimitriu, Radu & Warlop, Luk, 2022. "Is similarity a constraint for service-to-service brand extensions?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1019-1041.
    20. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Factors affecting Indian shoppers׳ attitude and purchase intention: An empirical check," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 561-569.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing; Brand Extensions; Experimental Design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pch:abante:v:4:y:2001:i:1:p:3-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduardo Walker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eapuccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.