IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-05979-2.html

A scientometric analysis on blockchain and NFTs: trends and development

Author

Listed:
  • Md Imran Khan

    (Jamia Millia Islamia
    New Delhi Institute of Management)

  • Ahmad Raza

    (Jamia Millia Islamia)

  • Abdulrahman Alomair

    (King Faisal University)

  • Abdulaziz S. Al Naim

    (King Faisal University)

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive contribution to the current understanding of blockchain technology and non-fungible token (NFTs). Blockchain technology is a revolutionary data storage and management tool that records data shared across a network of computers globally, making it safe, transparent, and decentralized. Non-fungible token is a specific type of token built on a blockchain, enabling the authentication of digital assets and safeguarding them against copying or fabrication. The research employed information on 3760 abstract data collected for the period from January 1, 2017, to June 03, 2025. The search criteria for data retrieval are based on the following keywords: “blockchain”, “non-fungible token”, and “token”. The data sources are Scopus and Web of Science. The study highlights the multi-dimensional and evolving discussion around blockchain and NFTs, including elements of technology, security, money, digital rights, and decentralization. The Wordcloud indicates a strong and growing innovation ecosystem, proposing new study avenues in trust mechanisms, smart contract development, and tokenized economies. The correlation graph visualizes that AI, data, finance, and blockchain show their mutual dependence has revolutionized our view of autonomy and governance. The study highlights authors who actively research blockchain and NFTs, as well as correlations between them. China leads the way in this research area and USA leads in terms of citation. The study’s finding informs evidence-based decision-making regarding the regulation and governance of blockchain and NFT technologies. For industry practitioners, the study’s insights can guide the development of innovative applications and solutions leveraging blockchain and NFTs. By examining a vast dataset of academic papers, the inquiry illuminates the key themes, emerging trends, and potential research gaps within this rapidly evolving field.

Suggested Citation

  • Md Imran Khan & Ahmad Raza & Abdulrahman Alomair & Abdulaziz S. Al Naim, 2025. "A scientometric analysis on blockchain and NFTs: trends and development," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05979-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05979-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-05979-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-05979-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    2. Fabian Schär, 2021. "Decentralized Finance: On Blockchain- and Smart Contract-Based Financial Markets," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 103(2), pages 153-174, April.
    3. Adhami, Saman & Giudici, Giancarlo & Martinazzi, Stefano, 2018. "Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 64-75.
    4. Fisch, Christian, 2019. "Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 1-22.
    5. de Villiers, Charl & Kuruppu, Sanjaya & Dissanayake, Dinithi, 2021. "A (new) role for business – Promoting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals through the internet-of-things and blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 598-609.
    6. Vidal-Tomás, David, 2022. "The new crypto niche: NFTs, play-to-earn, and metaverse tokens," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    7. Bruno Biais & Agostino Capponi & Lin William Cong & Vishal Gaur & Kay Giesecke, 2023. "Advances in Blockchain and Crypto Economics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6417-6426, November.
    8. Paech, Philipp, 2017. "The governance of blockchain financial networks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80440, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Yousaf, Imran & Nekhili, Ramzi & Umar, Muhammad, 2025. "Corrigendum to “Extreme connectedness between renewable energy tokens and fossil fuel markets” [Energy Economics Volume 114, October 2022, 106305]," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    10. Jakub Wyczik, 2024. "The rise of the metaverse: tethering effect and intellectual property of crypto tokens," Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 358-370.
    11. De Giovanni, Pietro, 2020. "Blockchain and smart contracts in supply chain management: A game theoretic model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Chen, Yan, 2018. "Blockchain tokens and the potential democratization of entrepreneurship and innovation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 567-575.
    13. Raza, Ahmad & Shakeel, Moonis, 2025. "Analysing research patterns on low carbon development, climate change mitigation and renewable energy through text analytics: An artificial intelligence approach," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(3).
    14. Diana-Cezara Toader & Corina Michaela Rădulescu & Cezar Toader, 2024. "Investigating the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Agri-Food Supply Chains: Analysis of an Extended UTAUT Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuk Ming Tang & Ka Yin Chau, 2025. "Blockchain evolution and management theoretical (BEMT) model based on integrated semantic similarity and co-citation analysis for next generation service industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 475-494, June.
    2. Ferdinand Thies & Sören Wallbach & Michael Wessel & Markus Besler & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Initial coin offerings and the cryptocurrency hype - the moderating role of exogenous and endogenous signals," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1691-1705, September.
    3. Magnus Schückes & Tobias Gutmann, 2021. "Why do startups pursue initial coin offerings (ICOs)? The role of economic drivers and social identity on funding choice," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 1027-1052, August.
    4. Giudici, Giancarlo & Giuffra Moncayo, Giancarlo & Martinazzi, Stefano, 2020. "The role of advisors’ centrality in the success of Initial Coin Offerings," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Choice between IEO and ICO: Speed vs. Liquidity vs. Risk," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Dulani Jayasuriya Daluwathumullagamage & Alexandra Sims, 2020. "Blockchain-Enabled Corporate Governance and Regulation," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-41, June.
    7. José Campino & Ana Brochado & Álvaro Rosa, 2022. "Initial coin offerings (ICOs): Why do they succeed?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    8. Ploypailin Kijkasiwat & Hamza Almustafa & Pongsutti Phuensane, 2023. "Initial coin offerings for business: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-31, January.
    9. Kreppmeier, Julia & Laschinger, Ralf & Steininger, Bertram & Dorfleitner, Gregor, 2023. "Real Estate Security Token Offerings and the Secondary Market: Driven by Crypto Hype or Fundamentals?," Working Paper Series 23/6, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    10. Mayank Joshipura & Rim El Khoury & Muneer M. Alshater, 2025. "ICOs conceptual unveiled: scholarly review of an entrepreneurial finance innovation," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-47, December.
    11. Johannes Gartner & Andrea Moro, 2025. "Followers beat content: social media and the managers in initial coin offerings (ICOs)," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1229-1256, April.
    12. Pierluigi Martino & Tom Vanacker & Igor Filatotchev & Cristiano Bellavitis, 2025. "(De)centralized governance and the value of platform-based new ventures: The moderating role of teams and transparency," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 1763-1790, April.
    13. Samieifar, Shadi & Baur, Dirk G., 2021. "Read me if you can! An analysis of ICO white papers," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    14. Giuliano Sansone & Flavio Santalucia & Davide Viglialoro & Paolo Landoni, 2023. "Blockchain for social good and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from a case study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2182-2193, September.
    15. Min Xu & Xingtong Chen & Gang Kou, 2019. "A systematic review of blockchain," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Giancarlo Giudici & Saman Adhami, 2019. "The impact of governance signals on ICO fundraising success," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(2), pages 283-312, June.
    17. Christian Hackober & Carolin Bock, 2021. "Which investors’ characteristics are beneficial for initial coin offerings? Evidence from blockchain technology-based firms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(8), pages 1085-1124, October.
    18. Perez, Charles & Sokolova, Karina & Konate, Malick, 2020. "Digital social capital and performance of initial coin offerings," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    19. Aysan, Ahmet Faruk & Batten, Jonathan & Gozgor, Giray & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Nanaeva, Zhamal, 2024. "Metaverse and financial markets: A quantile-time-frequency connectedness analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PB).
    20. Shih‐Chu Chou & Zhe‐An Li & Tawei Wang & Ju‐Chun Yen, 2023. "How the quality of initial coin offering white papers influences fundraising: Using security token offerings white papers as a benchmark," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 3-18, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05979-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/palcomms/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.