IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04937-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are female students less satisfied with doctoral candidacy experiences? Evidence from 108 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Changhong Teng

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

  • Chunmei Yang

    (Beijing Institute of Technology)

  • Guanghao Wu

    (University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences)

Abstract

Satisfaction is a crucial indicator of higher education student experience, and lower doctoral student satisfaction may lead to reduced productivity and higher attrition. Considering that empirical research on gender differences in satisfaction remains rather scarce, this study explored the gender differences in satisfaction with doctoral studies as well as the underlying rationales for these differences, utilising data from 6372 doctoral students in 108 countries in the 2019 Nature Global Doctoral Student Survey. The research outcomes show that women have a lower satisfaction rate in pursuing a doctoral degree than men, and the probability of their satisfaction rate decreasing is 3.88% higher. The mechanism analysis reveals that the main factors causing relatively lower satisfaction among female doctoral students are their higher probabilities of encountering gender discrimination and sexual harassment and their greater difficulties in attaining a work-life balance. Moreover, overworked female doctoral students and those from low-income and lower-middle-income countries have relatively lower satisfaction compared to their male counterparts. Our empirical evidence uncovers the intricate challenges that female doctoral students encounter and provides valuable insights for improving the doctoral study environment and promoting gender equality.

Suggested Citation

  • Changhong Teng & Chunmei Yang & Guanghao Wu, 2025. "Are female students less satisfied with doctoral candidacy experiences? Evidence from 108 countries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04937-2
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04937-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04937-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04937-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04937-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.