IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorapm/v21y2022i5d10.1057_s41272-021-00355-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Pay What You Want pricing strategy applied to digital products: an essay

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Isabel Torres

    (University of Aveiro and INESC TEC)

  • César Lapa Barros

    (Polytechnic Institute of Porto, R. Jaime Lopes Amorim)

  • Amélia Ferreira Silva

    (Polytechnic Institute of Porto)

  • Ricardo Jorge Silva

    (Polytechnic Institute of Porto, R. Jaime Lopes Amorim)

Abstract

This study aims to examine if the pricing strategy “Pay What You Want” can be the best option for the industry of digital products’ distribution, when compared with other fixed prices policies. To verify the adequacy of Pay What You Want Pricing strategy, we conducted an online survey using a sample of online consumers, to evaluate their buying intention and the willingness to pay regarding a set of digital products. Results show that, in some instances, the Pay What You Want Pricing strategy yields a greater sales revenue through the reduction of the individual amounts paid, which is counter-balanced by the increasing number of transactions. We conclude that this pricing strategy is as much suitable for companies, as they may potentially increase their sales revenue.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Isabel Torres & César Lapa Barros & Amélia Ferreira Silva & Ricardo Jorge Silva, 2022. "The Pay What You Want pricing strategy applied to digital products: an essay," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 529-537, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:21:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1057_s41272-021-00355-6
    DOI: 10.1057/s41272-021-00355-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41272-021-00355-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41272-021-00355-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kanupriya Katyal & Vinay Kanetkar & Sanjay Patro, 2019. "What is a fair fare? Exploring the differences between perceived price fairness and perceived price unfairness," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 133-146, April.
    2. Anja Lambrecht & Avi Goldfarb & Alessandro Bonatti & Anindya Ghose & Daniel Goldstein & Randall Lewis & Anita Rao & Navdeep Sahni & Song Yao, 2014. "How do firms make money selling digital goods online?," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 331-341, September.
    3. Ke-Wei Huang & Arun Sundararajan, 2011. "Pricing Digital Goods: Discontinuous Costs and Shared Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 721-738, December.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Michael D. Smith, 2000. "Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 563-585, April.
    5. Benjamin Edelman & Sonia Jaffe & Scott Duke Kominers, 2010. "To Groupon or Not to Groupon: The Profitability of Deep Discounts," Harvard Business School Working Papers 11-063, Harvard Business School, revised Jan 2014.
    6. J. Yannis Bakos, 1997. "Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(12), pages 1676-1692, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Egbert, Henrik & Greiff, Matthias, 2023. "Pay-What-You-Want für öffentliche Güter: Eine Fallstudie zu vhs.wissen live [Pay-What-You-Want and Public Goods: a case study of vhs.wissen live]," MPRA Paper 118432, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oksana Loginova & Andrea Mantovani, 2019. "Price competition in the presence of a web aggregator," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 43-73, January.
    2. O. Loginova & A. Mantovani, 2015. "Information and Online Reviews," Working Papers wp996, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    3. Brent Kitchens & Anuj Kumar & Praveen Pathak, 2018. "Electronic Markets and Geographic Competition Among Small, Local Firms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 928-946, December.
    4. Anindya Ghose & Avi Goldfarb & Sang Pil Han, 2013. "How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 613-631, September.
    5. Zhu, Hongwei & Madnick, Stuart & Siegel, Michael, 2003. "Global Comparison Aggregation Services," Working papers 4410-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Bing Jing, 2018. "Showrooming and Webrooming: Information Externalities Between Online and Offline Sellers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 469-483, May.
    7. Edgardo Arturo Ayala Gaytán, 2009. "Social network externalities and price dispersion in online markets," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Ratchford, Brian T., 2009. "Online Pricing: Review and Directions for Research," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 82-90.
    9. Xin (Shane) Wang & Feng Mai & Roger H. L. Chiang, 2014. "Database Submission ---Market Dynamics and User-Generated Content About Tablet Computers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 449-458, May.
    10. Jialu Liu & Siqi Pei & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2024. "Online Food Delivery Platforms and Female Labor Force Participation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1074-1091, September.
    11. Sengupta Anirban & Wiggins Steven N., 2012. "Comparing Price Dispersion on and off the Internet Using Airline Transaction Data," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-38, March.
    12. Malin Sundström & Anita Radon, 2015. "Utilizing The Concept Of Convenience As A Business Opportunity In Emerging Markets," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 6(2).
    13. Lorin M. Hitt & Frances X. Frei, 2002. "Do Better Customers Utilize Electronic Distribution Channels? The Case of PC Banking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(6), pages 732-748, June.
    14. Shan Wang & Shi Zheng & Lida Xu & Dezheng Li & Huan Meng, 2008. "A literature review of electronic marketplace research: Themes, theories and an integrative framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 555-571, November.
    15. Jeonghye Choi & David R. Bell & Leonard M. Lodish, 2012. "Traditional and IS-Enabled Customer Acquisition on the Internet," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 754-769, April.
    16. Grewal, Dhruv & Iyer, Gopalkrishnan R. & Krishnan, R. & Sharma, Arun, 2003. "The Internet and the price-value-loyalty chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 391-398, May.
    17. Yan, Ruiliang & Ghose, Sanjoy, 2010. "Forecast information and traditional retailer performance in a dual-channel competitive market," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 77-83, January.
    18. Jason Kuruzovich & Siva Viswanathan & Ritu Agarwal, 2010. "Seller Search and Market Outcomes in Online Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1702-1717, October.
    19. Oz Shy, 2013. "Window shopping," Working Papers 13-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    20. Meng Liu & Erik Brynjolfsson & Jason Dowlatabadi, 2021. "Do Digital Platforms Reduce Moral Hazard? The Case of Uber and Taxis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4665-4685, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorapm:v:21:y:2022:i:5:d:10.1057_s41272-021-00355-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.