IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Modelling Different Types of Bundled Automobile Insurance Choice Behaviour: The Case of Taiwan*

Listed author(s):
  • Ming-Jyh Wang


    (Insurance, Chaoyang University of Technology, 168 Gifeng E. Rd., Wufeng, Taichung 41300, Taiwan.)

  • Chieh-Hua Wen


    (Transportation Technology and Management, Feng Chia University, 100 Wenhwa Rd., Seatwen, Taichung 40724, Taiwan.)

  • Lawrence W Lan


    (Globan Marketing and Logitistics, MingDao University, 369 Wen-Hua Rd, Peetow, Changhua 52345, Taiwan.)

Registered author(s):

    Automobile insurance policies (AIPs) are typically offered by the insurers in different bundled formats and some of which may be highly similar. This study proposes a two-component modelling system, which consists of choice of physical damage coverage and choice of non-physical damage coverage. Both multinomial logit (MNL) and paired combinatorial logit (PCL) models are attempted to explain the choice behaviours of AIP alternatives. The proposed models are tested with a large data set drawn from a Taiwanese non-life insurance company. It is found that the PCL model is structurally superior to the MNL model in analysing the choice of physical damage bundled AIP alternatives. In the context of non-physical damage coverage choice, however, the assumptions from the MNL model hold, suggesting that the use of PCL model is not required. Based on our estimation results, the insurance providers can develop marketing strategies to refine their existing AIPs or to develop new AIPs to better serve their customers.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text PDF
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL:
    File Function: Link to full text HTML
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Palgrave Macmillan & The Geneva Association in its journal The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice.

    Volume (Year): 35 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 (April)
    Pages: 290-308

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:290-308
    Contact details of provider: Web page:


    Route de Malagnou 53, CH - 1208 Geneva

    Phone: +41-22 707 66 00
    Fax: +41-22 736 75 36
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web:

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. Joan T. Schmit & Jia-Hsing Yeh, 2003. "An Economic Analysis of Auto Compensation Systems: Choice Experiences From New Jersey and Pennsylvania," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 70(4), pages 601-628.
    2. Stroinski, Krzysztof J. & Currie, Iain D., 1989. "Selection of variables for automobile insurance rating," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 35-46, March.
    3. Maarten C. W. Janssen & Vladimir A. Karamychev, 2005. "Dynamic Insurance Contracts and Adverse Selection," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(1), pages 45-59.
    4. Viaene, Stijn & Ayuso, Mercedes & Guillen, Montserrat & Van Gheel, Dirk & Dedene, Guido, 2007. "Strategies for detecting fraudulent claims in the automobile insurance industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(1), pages 565-583, January.
    5. Picard, Pierre, 1996. "Auditing claims in the insurance market with fraud: The credibility issue," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 27-56, December.
    6. Dionne, G. & Doherty, N., 1991. "Adverse Selection, Commitment and Renegotiation : Extention to and Evidence From Insurance Markets," Cahiers de recherche 9134, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
    7. Chiappori, Pierre-Andre & Salanie, Bernard, 1997. "Empirical contract theory: The case of insurance data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-5), pages 943-950, April.
    8. Chu-Shiu Li & Chwen-Chi Liu & Jia-Hsing Yeh, 2007. "The Incentive Effects of Increasing Per-Claim Deductible Contracts in Automobile Insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 74(2), pages 441-459.
    9. Georges Dionne & Olfa Ghali, 2003. "The (1992) Bonus-Malus System in Tunisia: An Empirical Evaluation," THEMA Working Papers 2003-40, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    10. Jennifer L. Wang & Ching-Fan Chung & Larry Y. Tzeng, 2008. "An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Increasing Deductibles on Moral Hazard," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 75(3), pages 551-566.
    11. Dellaert, N. P. & Frenk, J. B. G. & Kouwenhoven, A. & Van Der Laan, B. S., 1990. "Optimal claim behaviour for third-party liability insurances or to claim or not to claim: that is the question," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 59-76, March.
    12. Jennifer L. Wang, 2004. "Asymmetric Information Problems in Taiwan's Automobile Insurance Market: The Effect of Policy Design on Loss Characteristics," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 53-71, 03.
    13. Steven B. Caudill & Mercedes Ayuso & Montserrat Guillén, 2005. "Fraud Detection Using a Multinomial Logit Model With Missing Information," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(4), pages 539-550.
    14. Lemaire, Jean & Zi, Hongmin, 1994. "A Comparative Analysis of 30 Bonus-Malus Systems," ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the International Actuarial Association, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(02), pages 287-309, November.
    15. Dellaert, N.P. & Frenk, J.B.G. & van Rijsoort, L.P., 1993. "Optimal claim behaviour for vehicle damage insurances," Econometric Institute Research Papers 11669, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    16. Dellaert, N. P. & Frenk, J. B. G. & van Rijsoort, L. P., 1993. "Optimal claim behaviour for vehicle damage insurances," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 225-244, June.
    17. Ania, Ana B. & Troger, Thomas & Wambach, Achim, 2002. "An evolutionary analysis of insurance markets with adverse selection," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 153-184, August.
    18. Stijn Viaene & Guido Dedene, 2004. "Insurance Fraud: Issues and Challenges," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 29(2), pages 313-333, April.
    19. Gunnar Lindberg, 2001. "Traffic Insurance and Accident Externality Charges," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 35(3), pages 399-416, September.
    20. Pierre-Andre Chiappori & Bernard Salanie, 2000. "Testing for Asymmetric Information in Insurance Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(1), pages 56-78, February.
    21. Koppelman, Frank S. & Wen, Chieh-Hua, 2000. "The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 75-89, February.
    22. Boyer, Marcel & Dionne, Georges, 1989. "An Empirical Analysis of Moral Hazard and Experience Rating," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 128-134, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:35:y:2010:i:2:p:290-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

    or (Rebekah McClure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.