IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pab/rmcpee/v20y2015i1p3-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Indicators for Marketing Effectiveness in Czech Companies || Indicadores para medir la eficacia del marketing en las empresas checas

Author

Listed:
  • Milichovsky, Frantisek

    (Department of Management. Faculty of Business and Management. Brno University of Technology (Czech Republic))

Abstract

Marketing effectiveness has been accepted as one of the most important parts in corporate performance system. It is due to dynamical changes in business environment in after-crisis times. The goal of this paper is the definition of used possible indicators in measuring marketing effectiveness. The paper presents advance in usable indicators, especially financial and non-financial metrics. Selected studies, focusing on different branches and different indicators, were analysed by the author. The author of article puts the question, which classification is the most statistical explaining the difference of stake- holders in term of evaluation their impact on business management. There were made cluster analysis for data mining including its graphic presentation through dendogram and two-sample t-test by statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics 22 to obtain relevant answer on defined research question. Such limitation of the paper is possible to signify focusing only on domestic (Czech) industrial market. || La eficacia de la comercialización se ha aceptado como una de las partes m ´as importantes del sistema del funcionamiento corporativo. Es debido a los cambios dinámicos en el ambiente de negocio en tiempos después de la crisis. El objetivo de este artículo es la definición de indicadores posibles usados en la medición de eficacia del marketing. El artículo presenta avance en indicadores usables, especialmente métricas financieras y no financieras. Los estudios seleccionados, centrándose en diversas ramas y diversos indicadores, fueron analizados por el autor. El autor del artículo pone la pregunta: ¿cuál es la clasificación más estadística que explica la diferencia de las partes interesadas en función de la evaluación de su impacto en gestión empresarial? Se realizaron análisis clúster para minería de datos, incluyendo su representación gráfica a través de dendograma y t-test para dos muestras usando el software estadístico IBM SPSS Statistics 22 para obtener respuesta pertinente a la pregunta definida en la investigación. Tal limitación del artículo es posible significar centrarse solamente en el mercado industrial doméstico (checo).

Suggested Citation

  • Milichovsky, Frantisek, 2015. "Measuring Indicators for Marketing Effectiveness in Czech Companies || Indicadores para medir la eficacia del marketing en las empresas checas," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 20(1), pages 3-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:3-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upo.es/RevMetCuant/pdf/vol20/art106.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.upo.es/RevMetCuant/art.php?id=106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lebas, Michel J., 1995. "Performance measurement and performance management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1-3), pages 23-35, October.
    2. Boldeanu Dana Maria, 2009. "Information System For Modeling Economic And Financial Performances," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 902-907, May.
    3. Romualdas Ginevičius & Valentinas Podvezko & Adomas Ginevičius, 2013. "Quantitative evaluation of enterprise marketing activities," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 200-212, February.
    4. Barwise, Patrick & Farley, John U., 2004. "Marketing Metrics:: Status of Six Metrics in Five Countries," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 257-262, June.
    5. Tatjana Samsonowa & Peter Buxmann & Wolfgang Gerteis, 2009. "Defining Kpi Sets For Industrial Research Organizations — A Performance Measurement Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 157-176.
    6. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Maurizio Galetto & Domenico Maisano, 2007. "Management by Measurement," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-73212-9, September.
    7. Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E. & Angelis, Jannis Jan & Munik, Juliano, 2013. "Performance measurement systems: A consensual analysis of their roles," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 524-542.
    8. David Pollard & Iveta Simberova, 2008. "On researching the internationalisation of SMEs in transformation economies," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2/3), pages 107-124.
    9. Samsonowa, Tatjana & Buxmann, Peter & Gerteis, Wolfgang, 2009. "Defining KPI sets for Industrial Research Organizations - A Performance Measurement Approach," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 35832, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. František Milichovský, 2017. "Effectiveness of Marketing Mix Activities in Engineering Companies in the Czech Republic," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 1, pages 45-55, March.
    2. Jana Hornungová & František Milichovský, 2013. "Profit indicators in performance systems in the Czech companies," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(2), pages 345-352.
    3. Schönefeld, Carsten & Möller, Klaus & Engelhardt, Philipp, 2015. "Erfolgstreiber Innovationskennzahlen," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 69(3), pages 322-350.
    4. Prabath Chaminda Abeysiriwardana & Udith K. Jayasinghe-Mudalige, 2022. "Single window performance management: a strategy for evaluation integrated research culture in the commercial agriculture sector," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Jana Hornungová & Kateřina Petrová & František Milichovský, 2020. "Modeling Cause and Effect Relationships of Strategy Map Using Economic and Social Performance Factors in the Organizational Culture," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 613-624.
    6. Csikósová, Adriana & Čulková, Katarína & Janošková, Mária, 2016. "Evaluation of quantitative indicators of marketing activities in the banking sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5028-5033.
    7. Jana Hornungová & František Milichovský, 2018. "Agricultural Sector Performance Evaluation in Terms of Financial Indicators: A Comparison of Czech Republic, Slovakia and Western Balkan States," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 66(2), pages 497-507.
    8. Gallear, David & Ghobadian, Abby & Chen, Weifeng, 2012. "Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 83-91.
    9. Franceschini, Fiorenzo & Maisano, Domenico, 2015. "Checking the consistency of the solution in ordinal semi-democratic decision-making problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PB), pages 188-195.
    10. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Maurizio Galetto & Domenico Maisano & Luca Mastrogiacomo, 2012. "The success-index: an alternative approach to the h-index for evaluating an individual’s research output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(3), pages 621-641, September.
    12. Jussi Tanskanen & Liisa Mäkelä & Riitta Viitala, 2019. "Linking Managerial Coaching and Leader–Member Exchange on Work Engagement and Performance," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1217-1240, April.
    13. Anca Mehedintu, Cerasela Pîrvu, Cristian Pîrvu Author-Workplace-Name: Universitatea din Craiova, Craiova, România; Universitatea “Constantin Brâncusi”, Târgu Jiu, România, 2012. "Performance Management Approaches In Economic Organizations Using Information Technology," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 109-116, March.
    14. Schwartz, Robert & Deber, Raisa, 2016. "The performance measurement–management divide in public health," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 273-280.
    15. Tolonen, Arto & Haapasalo, Harri & Harkonen, Janne & Verrollot, Jordan, 2017. "Supply chain capability creation – The creation of the supply chain readiness for a new product during product development process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 237-245.
    16. Guo, Chiquan & Wang, Yong J. & Metcalf, Ashley, 2014. "How to calibrate conventional market-oriented organizational culture in 21st century production-centered firms? A customer relationship perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 235-245.
    17. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Domenico Maisano, 2012. "Publication and patent analysis of European researchers in the field of production technology and manufacturing systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(1), pages 89-100, October.
    18. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Domenico Maisano, 2011. "Criticism on the hg-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(2), pages 339-346, February.
    19. Olufemi A. Ogunkoya & Emmanuel Y. Ogundele & Adeola E. Adetayo, 2021. "Knowledge Transfer and Business Performance: A Study of Manufacturing Organizations in Ogun State, the Federal Republic of Nigeria," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 86-101.
    20. Melinda-Timea FÜLÖP & Mirela-Oana PINTEA, 2015. "The Link Between Corporate Governance And Performance - Evidence From Romania," Management Intercultural, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 33, pages 81-90, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    marketing effectiveness; performance; financial indicators; non-financial indicators; engineering; efectividad del marketing; desempeño; indicadores financieros; indicadores no financieros; ingeniería;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pab:rmcpee:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:3-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publicación Digital - UPO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dmupoes.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.