IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Interpreting Changes in Minimum Wage Incidence Rates

Listed author(s):
  • Tim Maloney


    (Auckland University of Technology)

  • Gail Pacheco

    (Auckland University of Technology)

Statutory minimum wages increased substantially in New Zealand between 2000 and 2008. Where less than three per cent of workers were being paid the minimum wage in the late 1990s, this figure increased to more than ten per cent of workers by 2008. However, it is not obvious how this rise in the minimum wage incidence rate should be interpreted. The problem is that minimum wages can have behavioural effects. A higher wage floor could reduce the proportion of minimum wage workers in an economy by eliminating low-wage jobs. Recent New Zealand experience provides a unique opportunity for estimating this behavioural impact. The substantial gap between adult and teenage minimum wages was eliminated immediately in 2001 for 18 and 19 year-olds and gradually by 2008 for 16 and 17 year-olds. We find little evidence of an overall behavioural effect. Increases in incidence rates were not diminished by losses in low-wage employment. However, we find compelling evidence that minimum wage incidence for an age group is reduced by increases in minimum wages for neighbouring age groups.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School in its journal Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE).

Volume (Year): 13 (2010)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 219-240

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:219-240
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ozl:journl:v:13:y:2010:i:3:p:219-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alan Duncan)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.