IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/onb/oenbfs/y2006i11b3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational Risk and Contagion in the Austrian Large-Value Payment System ARTIS

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrike Elsenhuber

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

  • Claus Puhr

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank, Financial Markets Analysis and Surveillance Division)

  • Stefan W. Schmitz

    (Oesterreichische Nationalbank)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to quantify the contagion effect of an operational incident occurring at one ARTIS participant’s site on the payment activity of the other ARTIS participants. We used model simulations to focus on operational problems occurring at one of the participants, not an operational failure of the ARTIS platform itself. The scenarios are designed according to an ex-ante estimation of potential risk concentrations based on actual data for the sample period (Schmitz et al., 2006). The main conclusion from the simulations was that the contagion effect in ARTIS is low on condition that the existing business continuity arrangements prove effective. However, this is a very restrictive assumption. Without the use of business continuity arrangements or if they turn out to be not fully effective, the contagion effect on the smooth functioning of the payment system was substantial in all three scenarios. In contrast to the most common approach described in the literature, we used actual (instead of simulated) liquidity data to study the contagion effect at the individual bank level as well as at the aggregate level of unsettled payments. A non-negligible number of banks failed to settle payments in all three scenarios. The paper also provides results on two features of large-value payment systems that have hitherto gone unstudied in the literature: the stop-sending rule and debit authorization.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrike Elsenhuber & Claus Puhr & Stefan W. Schmitz, 2006. "Operational Risk and Contagion in the Austrian Large-Value Payment System ARTIS," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 11, pages 96-113.
  • Handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfs:y:2006:i:11:b:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.oenb.at/dam/jcr:4ff95b94-2761-4383-a738-ea9356ccb913/fsr_11_special_topics_03_tcm16-43721.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bech, Morten L. & Garratt, Rod, 2003. "The intraday liquidity management game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 198-219, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kei Imakubo & Yutaka Soejima, 2010. "The Microstructure of Japan's Interbank Money Market: Simulating Contagion of Intraday Flow of Funds Using BOJ-NET Payment Data," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 28, pages 151-180, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galbiati, Marco & Soramäki, Kimmo, 2011. "An agent-based model of payment systems," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 859-875, June.
    2. Marius Jurgilas & Antoine Martin, 2013. "Liquidity-saving mechanisms in collateral-based RTGS payment systems," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 29-60, February.
    3. Enghin Atalay & Antoine Martin & James J. McAndrews, 2008. "The welfare effects of a liquidity-saving mechanism," Staff Reports 331, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    4. Mark J Manning & Matthew Willison, 2006. "Modelling the cross-border use of collateral in payment systems," Bank of England working papers 286, Bank of England.
    5. Mills, David Jr., 2006. "Alternative central bank credit policies for liquidity provision in a model of payments," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(7), pages 1593-1611, October.
    6. Gara Afonso & Darrell Duffie & Lorenzo Rigon & Hyun Song Shin, 2022. "How Abundant Are Reserves? Evidence from the Wholesale Payment System," Staff Reports 1040, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    7. Alexander Kroeger & James J. McAndrews, 2016. "The payment system benefits of high reserve balances," Staff Reports 779, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    8. Shaun Byck & Ronald Heijmans, 2020. "How much liquidity would a liquidity-saving mechanism save if a liquidity-saving mechanism could save liquidity? A simulation approach for Canada's large-value payment system Shaun Byck," Working Papers 682, DNB.
    9. Bardoscia, Marco & Ferrara, Gerardo & Vause, Nicholas & Yoganayagam, Michael, 2021. "Simulating liquidity stress in the derivatives market," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    10. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2003_023 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Klaus Abbink & Ronald Bosman & Ronald Heijmans & Frans van Winden, 2017. "Disruptions in Large-Value Payment Systems: An Experimental Approach," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 13(4), pages 63-95, December.
    12. Antoine Martin & James J. McAndrews, 2008. "An economic analysis of liquidity-saving mechanisms," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 14(Sep), pages 25-39.
    13. Jurgilas, Marius & Zikes, Filip, 2012. "Implicit intraday interest rate in the UK unsecured overnight money market," Bank of England working papers 447, Bank of England.
    14. Matthew Willison, 2005. "Real-Time Gross Settlement and hybrid payment systems: a comparison," Bank of England working papers 252, Bank of England.
    15. Luca Arciero & Claudia Biancotti & Leandro D'Aurizio & Claudio Impenna, 2009. "Exploring Agent-Based Methods for the Analysis of Payment Systems: A Crisis Model for StarLogo TNG," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 12(1), pages 1-2.
    16. Monticini, Andrea & Ravazzolo, Francesco, 2014. "Forecasting the intraday market price of money," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 304-315.
    17. Nellen, Thomas, 2019. "Intraday liquidity facilities, late settlement fee and coordination," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 124-131.
    18. Christine A. Parlour & Uday Rajan & Johan Walden, 2022. "Payment System Externalities," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 77(2), pages 1019-1053, April.
    19. Denbee, Edward & Julliard, Christian & Li, Ye & Yuan, Kathy, 2021. "Network risk and key players: A structural analysis of interbank liquidity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 831-859.
    20. Abbassi, Puriya & Fecht, Falko & Tischer, Johannes, 2015. "The intraday interest rate: What's that?," Discussion Papers 24/2015, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    21. Thomas M. Eisenbach & Anna Kovner & Michael Junho Lee, 2022. "When It Rains, It Pours: Cyber Risk and Financial Conditions," Staff Reports 1022, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Payment Systems; Operational Risk; Financial Stability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E50 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - General
    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:onb:oenbfs:y:2006:i:11:b:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan W. Schmitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oenbbat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.