IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nup/jrmdke/v4y2016i4p515-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Dynamics Impact on Intellectual Capital in Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Ruxandra BEJINARU

    ("Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show the influence of knowledge dynamics processes upon the intellectual capital in organizations. In the literature, the authors focus on knowledge dynamics and knowledge management or intellectual capital but very few papers discuss the influence of knowledge dynamics upon the structure and functionality of intellectual capital in organizations. We use a conceptual approach based on the theory of multifield organizational knowledge and the theory of organizational integrators to demonstrate that intellectual capital structure results from the organizational knowledge dynamics. The well-known model of intellectual capital based on human capital, structural capital and relational capital appears as a meta-model that can be decomposed into rational capital, emotional capital and spiritual capital in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2016. "Knowledge Dynamics Impact on Intellectual Capital in Organizations," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(4), pages 515-534, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:515-534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/download/192/150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/192/150
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. Constantin BRÄ‚TIANU, 2013. "The Triple Helix of the Organizational Knowledge," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 1(2), pages 207-220, August.
    3. Szulanski, Gabriel, 2000. "The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 9-27, May.
    4. Constantin BRATIANU & Ivona ORZEA, 2010. "Organizational knowledge creation," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(3), Autumn.
    5. Constantin Bratianu & Ivona ORZEA, 2009. "Emergence of the Cognitive-Emotional Knowledge Dyad," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(5), pages 893-901, December.
    6. Ettore Bolisani & Stefano Borgo & Alessandro Oltramari, 2012. "Using knowledge as an object: challenges and implications," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 202-205, September.
    7. Aino Kianto, 2007. "What do we really mean by the dynamic dimension of intellectual capital?," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(4), pages 342-356.
    8. Peter Franz, 2010. "Knowledge spill-overs for knowledge-based development: progression in theory and obstacles for empirical research," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 25-38.
    9. Laurie Hunter, 2002. "Intellectual Capital: Accumulation and Appropriation," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n22, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    10. Constantin BRATIANU, 2016. "Knowledge Dynamics," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(3), pages 323-337, September.
    11. Giovanni Schiuma & Antonio Lerro, 2010. "Knowledge-based dynamics of regional development: the intellectual capital innovation capacity model," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 39-52.
    12. Andrew R. Thomas & Nicolae Al. Pop & Constantin Bratianu (ed.), 2013. "The Changing Business Landscape of Romania," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-1-4614-6865-3, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nagwan AlQershi & Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar & Zakaria Abas, 2022. "The influence of structural capital on the relationship between CRM implementation and the performance of manufacturing SMEs," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1205-1218, June.
    2. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(4), pages 577-595, December.
    3. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2018. "Factorial Analysis Perspectives upon StudentsÂ’ Skills in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 265-284, June.
    4. Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Universities in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 251-271, June.
    5. Shahrazad HADAD, 2017. "Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 203-225, June.
    6. Esi Marius Costel, 2018. "The Pragmatic Nature Of The Relationship Between Identity, Culture And Business Mission: An Approach In The Strategic Management Perspective," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1, pages 40-46, February.
    7. Cristian-Valentin HAPENCIUC & Daniela NEAMTU & Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2017. "Transformations In Education In A Knowledge-Based Society," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 306-317, November.
    8. Aisha Abdalla Al Mahjob Jamal, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and its Reflection on Quality of Productivity," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 1-67, July.
    9. Shahrazad HADAD, 2018. "Analyzing Corporate Social Entrepreneurship Specific to Knowledge Economy with a Focus on the Romanian Economic Context," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 6(2), pages 247-264, June.
    10. Mirjam M. Koehorst & Alexander J. A. M. van Deursen & Jan A. G. M. van Dijk & Jos de Haan, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review of Organizational Factors Influencing 21st-Century Skills," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    11. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2018. "Assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills needed in the Knowledge Economy," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(3), pages 1119-1132, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriela PRELIPCEAN & Ruxandra BEJINARU, 2016. "Universities as Learning Organizations in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(4), pages 469-492, December.
    2. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Farhad Alipour & Khairuddin Idris & Roohangiz Karimi, 2011. "Knowledge Creation and Transfer: Role of Learning Organization," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(3), pages 61-67, August.
    4. Paul R. Carlile & Eric S. Rebentisch, 2003. "Into the Black Box: The Knowledge Transformation Cycle," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(9), pages 1180-1195, September.
    5. Sophie Urmetzer & Michael P. Schlaile & Kristina B. Bogner & Matthias Mueller & Andreas Pyka, 2018. "Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Transformation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Constantin BRATIANU & Florina PINZARU, 2015. "Challenges for the University Intellectual Capital in the Knowledge Economy," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 3(4), pages 609-627, December.
    7. Kris Hoang & Steven E. Salterio & Jim Sylph, 2018. "Barriers to Transferring Auditing Research to Standard Setters," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 427-452, September.
    8. W. Sofka, 2008. "Globalizing Domestic Absorptive Capacities," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 769-792, December.
    9. Fascia, Michael, 2019. "The role of religious experience in the knowledge transfer process," OSF Preprints bm7s3, Center for Open Science.
    10. Gülru F. Özkan-Seely & Cheryl Gaimon & Stylianos Kavadias, 2015. "Dynamic Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Development for Product and Process Design Teams," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 177-190, May.
    11. Constantin BRATIANU, 2016. "Knowledge Dynamics," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(3), pages 323-337, September.
    12. Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2013. "Learning from Customers: Individual and Organizational Effects in Outsourced Radiological Services," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1539-1557, October.
    13. Josef Windsperger & Nina Gorovaia, 2011. "Knowledge attributes and the choice of knowledge transfer mechanism in networks: the case of franchising," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(4), pages 617-640, November.
    14. Christine Holmström Lind & Olivia H. Kang, 2017. "The Value-Adding Role of the Corporate Headquarters in Innovation Transfer Processes: The Issue of Headquarters Knowledge Situation," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 571-602, August.
    15. Simon Gaechter & Georg von Krogh & Stefan Haefliger, 2006. "Private-Collective Innovation and the Fragility of Knowledge Sharing," Discussion Papers 2006-21, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    16. Duvivier, Florence & Peeters, Carine & Harzing, Anne-Wil, 2019. "Not all international assignments are created equal: HQ-subsidiary knowledge transfer patterns across types of assignments and types of knowledge," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 181-190.
    17. Shahrazad HADAD, 2017. "Knowledge Economy: Characteristics and Dimensions," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(2), pages 203-225, June.
    18. Nissen, Mark E., 2019. "Initiating a system for visualizing and measuring dynamic knowledge," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 169-181.
    19. Gabriel Szulanski & Dimo Ringov & Robert J. Jensen, 2016. "Overcoming Stickiness: How the Timing of Knowledge Transfer Methods Affects Transfer Difficulty," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 304-322, April.
    20. Wang Juanru & Yang Jin, 2015. "An Empirical Study of Employees’ Tacit Knowledge Sharing Behavior," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 264-278, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:4:y:2016:i:4:p:515-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristian-Mihai VIDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmsnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.