IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksp/journ6/v3y2016i1sp63-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hazardous Materials Warehouse Selection as a Multiple Criteria Decision making Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Fýrat SEZER

    (Turkish Military Academy, Turkey.)

  • Özkan BALÝ
  • Pýnar GÜROL

Abstract

Radioactive, toxic, smother, flammable, and explosive materials in solid, liquid or gas states which can negatively impact goods, organisms, and most importantly humans are called as “Hazardous Materials”. Hazardous material transportation and storage carry risk factors in addition to their other types of transportation operations. Furthermore, selection of a suitable warehouse becomes a problematic issue in which multiple criteria are evaluated as paying attention to risky circumstances. In this context, hazardous material warehouse selection is considered as a multiple criteria decision problem in our study. In particularly, for the explosives storage among other hazardous materials, necessary criteria are determined according to expert’s consultant. The determined criteria are weighted according to decision makers’ consultancy and the alternatives are evaluated by fuzzy MULTIMOORA under uncertainty throughout the decision making process in the study.. The proposed approach is discussed on a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Fýrat SEZER & Özkan BALÝ & Pýnar GÜROL, 2016. "Hazardous Materials Warehouse Selection as a Multiple Criteria Decision making Problem," Journal of Economics Bibliography, KSP Journals, vol. 3(1S), pages 63-73, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksp:journ6:v:3:y:2016:i:1s:p:63-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JEB/article/download/784/846
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JEB/article/view/784/846
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vlachopoulou, Maro & Silleos, George & Manthou, Vassiliki, 2001. "Geographic information systems in warehouse site selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 205-212, May.
    2. Onut, Semih & Tuzkaya, Umut R. & Torun, Erçin, 2011. "Selecting container port via a fuzzy ANP-based approach: A case study in the Marmara Region, Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 182-193, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    2. Rasih Boztepe & Onur Çetin, 2020. "Sustainable Warehousing: Selecting The Best Warehouse for Solar Transformation," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(1), pages 97-110, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Shengchao & Cao, Xiaoshu & Liao, Wang & He, Yongquan, 2020. "Factors in the sea ports-of-entry and road ports-of-entry cross-border logistics route choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Sebastjan ŠKERLIČ & Robert MUHA, 2016. "Identifying Warehouse Location Using Hierarchical Clustering," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 11(3), pages 121-129, September.
    3. Dody Arfiansyah & Hoon Han & Sisi Zlatanova, 2024. "Land Suitability Analysis for Residential Development in an Ecologically Sensitive Area: A Case Study of Nusantara, the New Indonesian Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-34, July.
    4. Kose, Erkan & Erbas, Mehmet & Ersen, Erkan, 2017. "An integrated approach based on game theory and geographical information systems to solve decision problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 105-114.
    5. Xu, Jiuping & Song, Xiaoling & Wu, Yimin & Zeng, Ziqiang, 2015. "GIS-modelling based coal-fired power plant site identification and selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 520-539.
    6. Roy, Sandeepan & Maji, Avijit, 2019. "Optimization of High-Speed Railway Station Location Selection Based on Accessibility and Environmental Impact," ADBI Working Papers 953, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    7. Mohammad Ehsanifar & David A. Wood & Arezoo Babaie, 2021. "UTASTAR method and its application in multi-criteria warehouse location selection," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 202-215, June.
    8. Shairy Chaudhary & Atul Kumar & Malay Pramanik & Mahabir Singh Negi, 2022. "Land evaluation and sustainable development of ecotourism in the Garhwal Himalayan region using geospatial technology and analytical hierarchy process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2225-2266, February.
    9. Alessio Ishizaka & Philippe Nemery, 2013. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Framework for Partner Grouping When Sharing Facilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 773-799, July.
    10. Naai-Jung Shih & Yu-Chen Wu, 2023. "Hydrogeography-Based Fabric Assessment of Heritage Warehouses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    11. Andreia Teixeira Marques Dionísio, 2013. "The container terminal characteristics and customer’s satisfaction," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2013_14, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    12. Huang, Dong & Grifoll, Manel & Sanchez-Espigares, Jose A. & Zheng, Pengjun & Feng, Hongxiang, 2022. "Hybrid approaches for container traffic forecasting in the context of anomalous events: The case of the Yangtze River Delta region in the COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Güner, Samet, 2015. "Investigating infrastructure, superstructure, operating and financial efficiency in the management of Turkish seaports using data envelopment analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 36-48.
    14. Chen, Jihong & Wan, Zheng & Zhang, Fangwei & Park, Nam-kyu & Zheng, Aibing & Zhao, Jun, 2018. "Evaluation and comparison of the development performances of typical free trade port zones in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 506-526.
    15. Arnette, Andrew N. & Zobel, Christopher W., 2011. "Spatial analysis of renewable energy potential in the greater southern Appalachian mountains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2785-2798.
    16. Balci, Gökcay & Cetin, Ismail Bilge & Esmer, Soner, 2018. "An evaluation of competition and selection criteria between dry bulk terminals in Izmir," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 294-304.
    17. Lin, C.K.Y., 2009. "Stochastic single-source capacitated facility location model with service level requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 439-451, February.
    18. Orji, Ifeyinwa Juliet & Kusi-Sarpong, Simonov & Huang, Shuangfa & Vazquez-Brust, Diego, 2020. "Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Vega, Laura & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2019. "Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 132-148.
    20. Kumar, Amit & Kumar, Ranjit & Rao, K.H., 2012. "Enabling Efficient Supply Chain in Dairying Using GIS: A Case of Private Dairy Industry in Andhra Pradesh State," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(3), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fuzzy MULTIMOORA; Warehouse Selection; Hazardous Materials.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock
    • C40 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - General
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksp:journ6:v:3:y:2016:i:1s:p:63-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kspjournals.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.