IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1491-d1033959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydrogeography-Based Fabric Assessment of Heritage Warehouses

Author

Listed:
  • Naai-Jung Shih

    (Department of Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Chen Wu

    (Department of Architecture, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

Abstract

Brick warehouses represent a form of heritage at a different level of reactivation. Interdisciplinary exploration of social, cultural, and economic development has raised questions regarding the roles these buildings played in the past and how the heritage continued to evolve with the surrounding fabric. This study aimed to explore the spatiotemporal relationship between nine red brick warehouses and the historical development of the urban fabric in the Taipei metropolitan area, Taiwan. The relationship was defined by the quantitative trend assessment of the architecture, river, tributaries, and railroad, based on maps created between 1890 and 2020. The interactions between warehouses and fabric comprised single, meta, and determining indicators. The interactions evolved between two trends comprising intersections, maturity, and fluctuation. The consistent development of the architecture’s ascending trend was used as a reference indicator, by a relative scale to the fully developed stage of 100%. The meta-relationship between trends had a higher percentage and a greater occurrence closer to the present. The percentage totaled 67.74% after 1945 and remained above 50%, another indicator of the evolving frequency and intensity. The nine warehouses, which were part of a tributary branch system, created 11 intersections between 1950 and 1990. We concluded that the former active, supportive role of warehouses changed to a passive role, corresponding to the instrumentation of all trends. The warehouses functioned as trendsetters and interacted with the fabrics in a sustainable urbanization process. This was caused by role substitution, fabric replacement, degenerated dependence, and a diverted two-way relationship with hydrogeography. A geographic distribution of development was demonstrated from the river mouth inland.

Suggested Citation

  • Naai-Jung Shih & Yu-Chen Wu, 2023. "Hydrogeography-Based Fabric Assessment of Heritage Warehouses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1491-:d:1033959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jana Nozdrovická & Ivo Dostál & František Petrovič & Imrich Jakab & Marek Havlíček & Hana Skokanová & Vladimír Falťan & Peter Mederly, 2020. "Land-Use Dynamics in Transport-Impacted Urban Fabric: A Case Study of Martin–Vrútky, Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Vlachopoulou, Maro & Silleos, George & Manthou, Vassiliki, 2001. "Geographic information systems in warehouse site selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 205-212, May.
    3. Guerrero, D. & Hubert, J.-P. & Koning, M. & Roelandt, N., 2022. "On the spatial scope of warehouse activity: An exploratory study in France," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Vizzarri, Corrado & Sangiorgio, Valentino & Fatiguso, Fabio & Calderazzi, Antonella, 2021. "A holistic approach for the adaptive reuse project selection: The case of the former Enel power station in Bari," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Carlos Rizo-Maestre & Víctor Echarri-Iribarren & Raúl Prado-Govea & Francisco Pujol-López, 2019. "Radon Gas as an Indicator for Air Quality Control in Buried Industrial Architecture: Rehabilitation of the Old Británica Warehouses in Alicante for a Tourist Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Janka Saderova & Andrea Rosova & Marian Sofranko & Peter Kacmary, 2021. "Example of Warehouse System Design Based on the Principle of Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Jing Shen & Rung-Jiun Chou, 2021. "Cultural Landscape Development Integrated with Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Songkou Ancient Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Svenningsen, Stig Roar & Levin, Gregor & Perner, Mads Linnet, 2019. "Military land use and the impact on landscape: A study of land use history on Danish Defence sites," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 114-126.
    9. David Guerrero & Jean Paul Hubert & Martin Koning & Nicolas Roelandt, 2022. "On the Spatial Scope of Warehouse Activity: An Exploratory Study in France," Post-Print hal-03551270, HAL.
    10. Hokyung Chung & Jongoh Lee, 2021. "A Study on Cultural Urban Regeneration Using Modern Industrial Resources: Focusing on the Site-Specific Cultural Places of Gunsan, South Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guerrero, David & Niérat, Patrick & Thill, Jean-Claude, 2023. "Connecting short and long distance perspectives in freight transportation: Introduction to a special issue," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Wang, Kailai & Chen, Zhenhua & Cheng, Long & Zhu, Pengyu & Shi, Jian & Bian, Zheyong, 2023. "Integrating spatial statistics and machine learning to identify relationships between e-commerce and distribution facilities in Texas, US," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Sebastjan ŠKERLIČ & Robert MUHA, 2016. "Identifying Warehouse Location Using Hierarchical Clustering," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 11(3), pages 121-129, September.
    4. Kose, Erkan & Erbas, Mehmet & Ersen, Erkan, 2017. "An integrated approach based on game theory and geographical information systems to solve decision problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 308(C), pages 105-114.
    5. Xu, Jiuping & Song, Xiaoling & Wu, Yimin & Zeng, Ziqiang, 2015. "GIS-modelling based coal-fired power plant site identification and selection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 520-539.
    6. Roy, Sandeepan & Maji, Avijit, 2019. "Optimization of High-Speed Railway Station Location Selection Based on Accessibility and Environmental Impact," ADBI Working Papers 953, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    7. Mohammad Ehsanifar & David A. Wood & Arezoo Babaie, 2021. "UTASTAR method and its application in multi-criteria warehouse location selection," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 202-215, June.
    8. Shairy Chaudhary & Atul Kumar & Malay Pramanik & Mahabir Singh Negi, 2022. "Land evaluation and sustainable development of ecotourism in the Garhwal Himalayan region using geospatial technology and analytical hierarchy process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2225-2266, February.
    9. Alessio Ishizaka & Philippe Nemery, 2013. "A Multi-Criteria Group Decision Framework for Partner Grouping When Sharing Facilities," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 773-799, July.
    10. Joan Carles Membrado-Tena & Jorge Hermosilla-Pla, 2023. "The Precarious Survival of an Ancient Cultural Landscape: The Thousand-Year-Old Olive Trees of the Valencian Maestrat (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Pan Liao & Rongrong Yu & Ning Gu & Sahar Soltani, 2022. "A Syntactical Spatio-Functional Analysis of Four Typical Historic Chinese Towns from a Heritage Tourism Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-30, December.
    12. Sunny Han Han & Huimin Zhang, 2022. "Progress and Prospects in Industrial Heritage Reconstruction and Reuse Research during the Past Five Years: Review and Outlook," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Arnette, Andrew N. & Zobel, Christopher W., 2011. "Spatial analysis of renewable energy potential in the greater southern Appalachian mountains," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2785-2798.
    14. Lin, C.K.Y., 2009. "Stochastic single-source capacitated facility location model with service level requirements," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 439-451, February.
    15. Kumar, Amit & Kumar, Ranjit & Rao, K.H., 2012. "Enabling Efficient Supply Chain in Dairying Using GIS: A Case of Private Dairy Industry in Andhra Pradesh State," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(3), pages 1-10.
    16. Jaller, Miguel & Pineda, Leticia, 2017. "Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5dz0j1gg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    17. João Pedro Costa & Maria J. Andrade & Francesca Dal Cin, 2023. "The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 363-375.
    18. Zijie Zhou & Xin Zheng, 2022. "A Cultural Route Perspective on Rural Revitalization of Traditional Villages: A Case Study from Chishui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Beg, Ismat & Rashid, Tabasam, 2012. "Multi-criteria of Bike Purchasing Using Fuzzy Choquet Integral," MPRA Paper 96022, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jul 2013.
    20. Nikola Pavlov & Dragan Đurdjević & Milan Andrejić, 2023. "A Novel Two-Stage Methodological Approach for Storage Technology Selection: An Engineering–FAHP–WASPAS Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1491-:d:1033959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.