IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v48y2021i2d10.1007_s11116-019-10075-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consideration of different travel strategies and choice set sizes in transit path choice modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Nurul Hassan

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • Taha Hossein Rashidi

    (The University of New South Wales)

  • Neema Nassir

    (The University of Melbourne)

Abstract

Path choice modelling is typically conducted by considering a subset of paths, not the universal set of all feasible paths as this is computationally challenging. This study proposes a two-stage modelling approach. In the first stage, it develops a new probabilistic importance sampling protocol by using fuzzy logic. In the second stage, it tested different structures of the discrete choice models, where different strategy attributes are considered along with the traditional variables. The results prove that the new sampling protocol performs better than traditional sampling protocol. Again, the inclusion of the strategy attributes proves to yield better prediction. The results of the study recommend considering different strategy attributes in the path generation process as well as in the transit assignment models. The study also discusses the effect of the choice set size on the model performance. Household travel survey data of south-east Queensland, Australia is used to develop the models.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Nurul Hassan & Taha Hossein Rashidi & Neema Nassir, 2021. "Consideration of different travel strategies and choice set sizes in transit path choice modelling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 723-746, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11116-019-10075-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-019-10075-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-019-10075-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-019-10075-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Spiess, Heinz & Florian, Michael, 1989. "Optimal strategies: A new assignment model for transit networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 83-102, April.
    2. Alireza Khani & Mark Hickman & Hyunsoo Noh, 2015. "Trip-Based Path Algorithms Using the Transit Network Hierarchy," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 635-653, September.
    3. Arslan, Turan & Khisty, Jotin, 2006. "A rational approach to handling fuzzy perceptions in route choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 571-583, January.
    4. Debrezion, Ghebreegziabiher & Pels, Eric & Rietveld, Piet, 2009. "Modelling the joint access mode and railway station choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 270-283, January.
    5. Quattrone, Agata & Vitetta, Antonino, 2011. "Random and fuzzy utility models for road route choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1126-1139.
    6. Frejinger, E. & Bierlaire, M. & Ben-Akiva, M., 2009. "Sampling of alternatives for route choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 984-994, December.
    7. Bierlaire, M. & Bolduc, D. & McFadden, D., 2008. "The estimation of generalized extreme value models from choice-based samples," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 381-394, May.
    8. Piet Bovy & Sascha Hoogendoorn-Lanser, 2005. "Modelling route choice behaviour in multi-modal transport networks," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 341-368, July.
    9. Brian Lee & Paul Waddell, 2010. "Residential mobility and location choice: a nested logit model with sampling of alternatives," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 587-601, July.
    10. Akamatsu, Takashi, 1996. "Cyclic flows, Markov process and stochastic traffic assignment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 369-386, October.
    11. Lemp, Jason D. & Kockelman, Kara M., 2012. "Strategic sampling for large choice sets in estimation and application," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 602-613.
    12. Fatmi, Mahmudur Rahman & Chowdhury, Subeh & Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul, 2017. "Life history-oriented residential location choice model: A stress-based two-tier panel modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 293-307.
    13. Nassir, Neema & Hickman, Mark & Malekzadeh, Ali & Irannezhad, Elnaz, 2016. "A utility-based travel impedance measure for public transit network accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 26-39.
    14. Daniel McFadden, 1977. "Modelling the Choice of Residential Location," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 477, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    15. Nguyen, S. & Pallottino, S., 1988. "Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 176-186, November.
    16. Fosgerau, Mogens & Frejinger, Emma & Karlstrom, Anders, 2013. "A link based network route choice model with unrestricted choice set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 70-80.
    17. Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & de Grange, Louis, 2011. "A topological route choice model for metro," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 138-147, February.
    18. Gao, Song & Chabini, Ismail, 2006. "Optimal routing policy problems in stochastic time-dependent networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 93-122, February.
    19. Marie Karen Anderson & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2017. "Multimodal route choice models of public transport passengers in the Greater Copenhagen Area," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 221-245, September.
    20. Sang Nguyen & Stefano Pallottino & Michel Gendreau, 1998. "Implicit Enumeration of Hyperpaths in a Logit Model for Transit Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 54-64, February.
    21. Henn, Vincent & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2006. "Handling uncertainty in route choice models: From probabilistic to possibilistic approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(3), pages 1526-1538, December.
    22. Guevara, C. Angelo & Ben-Akiva, Moshe E., 2013. "Sampling of alternatives in Multivariate Extreme Value (MEV) models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 31-52.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nassir, Neema & Hickman, Mark & Ma, Zhen-Liang, 2019. "A strategy-based recursive path choice model for public transit smart card data," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 528-548.
    2. Hamzeh Alizadeh & Bilal Farooq & Catherine Morency & Nicolas Saunier, 2018. "On the role of bridges as anchor points in route choice modeling," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1181-1206, September.
    3. C. Angelo Guevara & Caspar G. Chorus & Moshe E. Ben-Akiva, 2016. "Sampling of Alternatives in Random Regret Minimization Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 306-321, February.
    4. Cortés, Cristián E. & Donoso, Pedro & Gutiérrez, Leonel & Herl, Daniel & Muñoz, Diego, 2023. "A recursive stochastic transit equilibrium model estimated using passive data from Santiago, Chile," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Kazagli, Evanthia & Bierlaire, Michel & Flötteröd, Gunnar, 2016. "Revisiting the route choice problem: A modeling framework based on mental representations," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 1-23.
    6. Mai, Tien & Yu, Xinlian & Gao, Song & Frejinger, Emma, 2021. "Routing policy choice prediction in a stochastic network: Recursive model and solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 42-58.
    7. Mai, Tien & Fosgerau, Mogens & Frejinger, Emma, 2015. "A nested recursive logit model for route choice analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 100-112.
    8. Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2018. "Itinerary planning with time budget for risk-averse travelers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 288-303.
    9. Pramesh Kumar & Alireza Khani, 2021. "Adaptive Park-and-ride Choice on Time-dependent Stochastic Multimodal Transportation Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 771-800, December.
    10. Leite Mariante, Gabriel & Ma, Tai-Yu & Van Acker, Véronique, 2018. "Modeling discretionary activity location choice using detour factors and sampling of alternatives for mixed logit models," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 151-165.
    11. Khani, Alireza, 2019. "An online shortest path algorithm for reliable routing in schedule-based transit networks considering transfer failure probability," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 549-564.
    12. Lai, Xinjun & Bierlaire, Michel, 2015. "Specification of the cross-nested logit model with sampling of alternatives for route choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 220-234.
    13. Crawford, Gregory S. & Griffith, Rachel & Iaria, Alessandro, 2021. "A survey of preference estimation with unobserved choice set heterogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 4-43.
    14. Meyer de Freitas, Lucas & Becker, Henrik & Zimmermann, Maëlle & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "Modelling intermodal travel in Switzerland: A recursive logit approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 200-213.
    15. Fosgerau, Mogens & Frejinger, Emma & Karlstrom, Anders, 2013. "A link based network route choice model with unrestricted choice set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 70-80.
    16. Yao, Rui & Bekhor, Shlomo, 2022. "A variational autoencoder approach for choice set generation and implicit perception of alternatives in choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 273-294.
    17. Evanthia Kazagli & Michel Bierlaire & Matthieu de Lapparent, 2020. "Operational route choice methodologies for practical applications," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 43-74, February.
    18. Guido Gentile & Sang Nguyen & Stefano Pallottino, 2005. "Route Choice on Transit Networks with Online Information at Stops," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 289-297, August.
    19. Maëlle Zimmermann & Emma Frejinger & Patrice Marcotte, 2021. "A Strategic Markovian Traffic Equilibrium Model for Capacitated Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 574-591, May.
    20. Nielsen, Otto Anker & Eltved, Morten & Anderson, Marie Karen & Prato, Carlo Giacomo, 2021. "Relevance of detailed transfer attributes in large-scale multimodal route choice models for metropolitan public transport passengers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 76-92.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:48:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s11116-019-10075-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.