IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v42y2015i5p827-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulating social influences on sustainable mobility shifts for heterogeneous agents

Author

Listed:
  • Masashi Okushima

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions by vehicle traffic should be reduced not only through innovations in automotive technology but also through a modal shift to sustainable transport. The modal shift to sustainable transport corresponding to the transport policy, as well as the purchase of clean energy vehicles (CEV) is regarded as the mobility shift. Therefore, both service improvement for sustainable transport modes, such as the bus rapid transit system, and economic incentive policies are considered in transport policy. Conversely, as the local community influences decisions on mobility shift, the estimation of CO 2 emissions should describe local interaction. Particularly, heterogeneity of local interaction should be described in the modeling of the mobility shift. Therefore, the mobility shift is modeled to incorporate heterogeneity and local interaction to estimate the effect of transport policies in reducing CO 2 emissions. The research question is how much do heterogeneity and local interaction influence mobility shift with the policy for sustainable transport. A multi-agent mobility shift simulation model that considers heterogeneity and local interaction is developed. For this purpose, the stated preference for mode change and purchase CEV policies is investigated via a questionnaire survey. The proposed multi-agent simulation model includes the decision process of the agent regarding mobility shift, the social influence process in the social network, and the CO 2 emission process. The decision process for commuting mode is modeled using the hierarchical Bayesian method mainly to describe the heterogeneity of the influence of the local mode share. The day-to-day dynamics of commuting mode choice and the purchase of CEVs corresponding to the transport policy are estimated using the proposed multi-agent simulation model. The results confirm that the heterogeneity of influence on social conformity should be considered in the modeling of modal shift as both conformity effects and non-conformity effects are observed. However, the assumption of homogeneous commuters might cause estimates that are too high, since the heterogeneity of commuters decreases the share of the sustainable transport mode. Furthermore, the green tax policy is confirmed to be suitable for maximizing the reduction rate of CO 2 emissions, as pricing based on fuel consumption maximizes reduction efficiency. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Masashi Okushima, 2015. "Simulating social influences on sustainable mobility shifts for heterogeneous agents," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 827-855, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:42:y:2015:i:5:p:827-855
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9649-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11116-015-9649-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-015-9649-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeremy Hackney & Fabrice Marchal, 2011. "A coupled multi-agent microsimulation of social interactions and transportation behavior," Post-Print halshs-00733505, HAL.
    2. Dugundji, Elenna R. & Páez, Antonio & Arentze, Theo A. & Walker, Joan L. & Carrasco, Juan A. & Marchal, Fabrice & Nakanishi, Hitomi, 2011. "Transportation and social interactions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 239-247, May.
    3. Axsen, Jonn & Mountain, Dean C. & Jaccard, Mark, 2009. "Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt02n9j6cv, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Axsen, Jonn & Mountain, Dean C. & Jaccard, Mark, 2009. "Combining stated and revealed choice research to simulate the neighbor effect: The case of hybrid-electric vehicles," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 221-238, August.
    5. Juan Carrasco & Eric Miller, 2006. "Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 463-480, September.
    6. Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Kitamura, Ryuichi, 2000. "An analysis of household vehicle holding durations considering intended holding durations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 339-351, June.
    7. Rose, J. & Hensher, D. A., 2004. "Modelling agent interdependency in group decision making," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 63-79, January.
    8. Han, Qi & Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry & Janssens, Davy & Wets, Geert, 2011. "The effects of social networks on choice set dynamics: Results of numerical simulations using an agent-based approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 310-322, May.
    9. Hackney, Jeremy & Marchal, Fabrice, 2011. "A coupled multi-agent microsimulation of social interactions and transportation behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 296-309, May.
    10. Joshua M. Epstein & Robert L. Axtell, 1996. "Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262550253, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cherchi, Elisabetta, 2017. "A stated choice experiment to measure the effect of informational and normative conformity in the preference for electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 88-104.
    2. Caroline Rodrigues Vaz & Tania Regina Shoeninger Rauen & Álvaro Guillermo Rojas Lezana, 2017. "Sustainability and Innovation in the Automotive Sector: A Structured Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Frank Goetzke & Regine Gerike & Antonio Páez & Elenna Dugundji, 2015. "Social interactions in transportation: analyzing groups and spatial networks," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 723-731, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kii, Masanobu & Nakanishi, Hitomi & Nakamura, Kazuki & Doi, Kenji, 2016. "Transportation and spatial development: An overview and a future direction," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 148-158.
    2. Wang, Yaoli & Kutadinata, Ronny & Winter, Stephan, 2019. "The evolutionary interaction between taxi-sharing behaviours and social networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 170-180.
    3. Miguel Picornell & Tomás Ruiz & Maxime Lenormand & José Ramasco & Thibaut Dubernet & Enrique Frías-Martínez, 2015. "Exploring the potential of phone call data to characterize the relationship between social network and travel behavior," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 647-668, July.
    4. Parady, Giancarlos & Frei, Andreas & Kowald, Matthias & Guidon, Sergio & Wicki, Michael & van den Berg, Pauline & Carrasco, Juan-Antonio & Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry & Wellman, Barry & Takami, , 2021. "A comparative study of social interaction frequencies among social network members in five countries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Kim, Jinhee & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry, 2014. "Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 71-85.
    6. Wei, Fangfang & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2016. "Day-to-day traffic dynamics considering social interaction: From individual route choice behavior to a network flow model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 335-354.
    7. Axsen, Jonn, 2010. "Interpersonal Influence within Car Buyers’ Social Networks: Observing Consumer Assessment of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) and the Spread of Pro-Societal Values," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8p32d18k, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    8. Fariya Sharmeen & Theo Arentze & Harry Timmermans, 2015. "Predicting the evolution of social networks with life cycle events," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 733-751, September.
    9. Sharmeen, Fariya & Arentze, Theo & Timmermans, Harry, 2014. "An analysis of the dynamics of activity and travel needs in response to social network evolution and life-cycle events: A structural equation model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 159-171.
    10. Ulrike Illmann & Jan Kluge, 2021. "Half Full or Half Empty? On the Importance of Nationwide Public Charging Infrastructure for the Development of Electromobility," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 28(05), pages 10-17, October.
    11. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2017. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1486-1525, December.
    12. Xie, Fei & Lin, Zhenhong, 2017. "Market-driven automotive industry compliance with fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards: Analysis based on consumer choice," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 299-311.
    13. Axsen, Jonn & Kurani, Kenneth S., 2009. "Interpersonal Influence within Car Buyers’ Social Networks: Five Perspectives on Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Demonstration Participants," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt35w7s3jp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    14. Wolbertus, Rick & van den Hoed, Robert & Kroesen, Maarten & Chorus, Caspar, 2021. "Charging infrastructure roll-out strategies for large scale introduction of electric vehicles in urban areas: An agent-based simulation study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 262-285.
    15. ILes, Richard, 2017. "Government Doctor Absenteeism And Its Effects On Consumer Demand In Rural North India," Working Papers 2018-9, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, revised 12 2018.
    16. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    17. Axsen, Jonn & Kurani, Kenneth S., 2013. "Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—What do car buyers want?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 532-543.
    18. Chen, Kee-Kuo & Ho, Hui-Ping & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2015. "Estimating attributes importance for container shipping industry by closing the listening gap with maximum convergent validity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 145-163.
    19. Noel, Lance & Papu Carrone, Andrea & Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Zarazua de Rubens, Gerardo & Kester, Johannes & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2019. "Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid applications: A Nordic choice experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 525-534.
    20. Araña, Jorge E. & León, Carmelo J., 2013. "Dynamic hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments: Evidence from measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers demand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 53-61.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:42:y:2015:i:5:p:827-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.