IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v36y2025i2d10.1007_s11002-024-09736-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A picture’s worth a thousand shares: An empirical analysis of logo sizes in social media posts and their impact on content virality

Author

Listed:
  • Wooyong Jo

    (Purdue University)

  • Hyejeong Kim

    (Yonsei University)

  • Jeonghye Choi

    (Yonsei University)

Abstract

Social media marketing is an established promotion strategy that offers firms extensive opportunities to nurture brand equity and to disseminate product information. Therefore, it is crucial for firms to create content with significant potential for virality. However, understanding the elements that make certain content more viral than others, especially regarding unstructured data such as images, is not straightforward to marketers. Using data collected from the Twitter API of 54 major fashion brands over 55 months, we investigated how image factors—particularly the size of brands’ logos in posted images—influence the virality of social media content. Our findings suggest that larger logos in posted images correspond to a greater number of retweets for midtier fashion brands. However, we find an opposite effect for top-tier brands—the smaller the logo, the greater the number of retweets. Bottom-tier brands also benefit from larger logos, but the impact is significantly less pronounced compared with midtier brands. These results present significant implications for viral marketing as well as the design of social media content.

Suggested Citation

  • Wooyong Jo & Hyejeong Kim & Jeonghye Choi, 2025. "A picture’s worth a thousand shares: An empirical analysis of logo sizes in social media posts and their impact on content virality," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 243-257, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09736-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-024-09736-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-024-09736-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11002-024-09736-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dina Mayzlin & Jiwoong Shin, 2011. "Uninformative Advertising as an Invitation to Search," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 666-685, July.
    2. Tanvi Gupta & Henrik Hagtvedt & Margaret C Campbell & Chris Janiszewski, 2021. "Safe Together, Vulnerable Apart: How Interstitial Space in Text Logos Impacts Brand Attitudes in Tight versus Loose Cultures," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(3), pages 474-491.
    3. Nick Feltovich & Richmond Harbaugh & Ted To, 2002. "Too Cool for School? Signalling and Countersignalling," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(4), pages 630-649, Winter.
    4. Aron Culotta & Jennifer Cutler, 2016. "Mining Brand Perceptions from Twitter Social Networks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 343-362, May.
    5. Kunal Swani & Lauren I. Labrecque, 2020. "Like, Comment, or Share? Self-presentation vs. brand relationships as drivers of social media engagement choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 279-298, September.
    6. Yue Han & Theodoros Lappas & Gaurav Sabnis, 2020. "The Importance of Interactions Between Content Characteristics and Creator Characteristics for Studying Virality in Social Media," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 576-588, June.
    7. Jonah Berger & Morgan Ward, 2010. "Subtle Signals of Inconspicuous Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(4), pages 555-569, December.
    8. Labrecque, Lauren I. & Markos, Ereni & Milne, George R., 2011. "Online Personal Branding: Processes, Challenges, and Implications," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 37-50.
    9. Jalali, Nima Y. & Papatla, Purushottam, 2019. "Composing tweets to increase retweets," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 647-668.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Qian & Qiang Gong & Yuxin Chen, 2015. "Untangling Searchable and Experiential Quality Responses to Counterfeits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 522-538, July.
    2. Helmut Bester & Matthias Lang & Jianpei Li, 2021. "Signaling versus Auditing," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 52(4), pages 859-883, December.
    3. Yang Gao & Wenjing Duan & Huaxia Rui, 2022. "Does Social Media Accelerate Product Recalls? Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 954-977, September.
    4. Baojun Jiang & Kinshuk Jerath & Kannan Srinivasan, 2011. "Firm Strategies in the "Mid Tail" of Platform-Based Retailing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 757-775, September.
    5. Bester, Helmut & Lang, Matthias & Li, Jianpei, 2018. "Signaling versus costly information acquisition," Discussion Papers 2018/11, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    6. Liang Guo & Yue Wu, 2016. "Consumer deliberation and quality signaling," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 233-269, September.
    7. Baojun Jiang & Jian Ni & Kannan Srinivasan, 2014. "Signaling Through Pricing by Service Providers with Social Preferences," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 641-654, September.
    8. Jaesoo Kim & Dongsoo Shin, 2016. "Price Discrimination with Demarketing," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 773-807, December.
    9. Tingting Nian & Arun Sundararajan, 2022. "Social Media Marketing, Quality Signaling, and the Goldilocks Principle," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 540-556, June.
    10. Harbaugh, Richmond & To, Theodore, 2020. "False modesty: When disclosing good news looks bad," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 43-55.
    11. Z. Jessie Liu & Pinar Yildirim & Z. John Zhang, 2024. "Less is more: A theory of minimalist luxury," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 78-110, January.
    12. Yi Qian & Qiang Gong & Yuxin Chen, 2013. "Untangling Searchable and Experiential Quality Responses to Counterfeits," NBER Working Papers 18784, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Juan Carlos Carbajal & Jonathan Hall & Hongyi Li, 2015. "Inconspicuous Conspicuous Consumption," Working Papers 38, Peruvian Economic Association.
    14. Suzuki, Toru, 2016. "Reminder game: Indirectness in persuasion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 240-256.
    15. Bilancini, Ennio & Boncinelli, Leonardo, 2018. "Signaling to analogical reasoners who can acquire costly information," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 50-57.
    16. Ludovica Cesareo & Claudia Townsend & Eugene Pavlov, 2023. "Hideous but worth it: Distinctive ugliness as a signal of luxury," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 636-657, May.
    17. Rosenbaum, Mark S. & Ramirez, Germán Contreras & Campbell, Jeffrey & Klaus, Philipp, 2021. "The product is me: Hyper-personalized consumer goods as unconventional luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 446-454.
    18. Smith, Andrew N. & Fischer, Eileen & Yongjian, Chen, 2012. "How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 102-113.
    19. Andreoni, James & Serra-Garcia, Marta, 2021. "Time inconsistent charitable giving," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Jin, Ting & Prentice, Catherine & Shao, Wei, 2021. "Identifying antecedent conditions for luxury brand purchase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11002-024-09736-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.