IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/mktlet/v29y2018i4d10.1007_s11002-018-9473-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are large portions always bad? Using the Delboeuf illusion on food packaging to nudge consumer behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia Petit

    () (KEDGE Business School)

  • Carlos Velasco

    (BI Norwegian Business School)

  • Charles Spence

    (Department of Experimental Psychology)

Abstract

Abstract Exaggerated portion sizes are generally pictured on the front of product packaging in order to stimulate food craving and encourage consumer purchasing decisions. However, one problem with such images is that they can set inappropriate norms as far as food consumption is concerned and hence result in people serving themselves more than they otherwise might. The research reported here builds on the fact that depicting a food portion in a smaller (vs. larger) container (i.e., plate or bowl) creates the illusion of a larger (vs. smaller) portion, although the actual quantity of food remains the same (this is known as the Delboeuf illusion). Here, we demonstrate in two experiments that by presenting food in a smaller container (thus giving rise to the illusion of a relatively larger portion), participants have higher purchase intentions (study 1) and perceive the food as being more appetizing (study 2) but, crucially, decrease the size of the portion that they serve themselves (studies 1 and 2). Overall, by giving the impression of a larger portion on product packaging, the Delboeuf illusion could potentially be used to nudge consumers to find food more desirable, while at the same time leading them to reduce their serving, thus potentially benefitting both consumers and the food industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia Petit & Carlos Velasco & Charles Spence, 2018. "Are large portions always bad? Using the Delboeuf illusion on food packaging to nudge consumer behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 435-449, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:29:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-018-9473-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11002-018-9473-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-018-9473-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ryan S. Elder & Aradhna Krishna, 2012. "The "Visual Depiction Effect" in Advertising: Facilitating Embodied Mental Simulation through Product Orientation," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 38(6), pages 988-1003.
    2. Olivia Petit & Frédéric Basso & Dwight Merunka & Charles Spence & Adrian David Cheok & Olivier Oullier, 2016. "Pleasure and the Control of Food Intake: An Embodied Cognition Approach to Consumer Self-Regulation," Post-Print hal-01822323, HAL.
    3. Petit, Olivia & Spence, Charles & Velasco, Carlos & Woods, Andy T. & Cheok, Adrian D., 2017. "Changing the influence of portion size on consumer behavior via imagined consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 240-248.
    4. Hu Xie & Elizabeth A. Minton & Lynn R. Kahle, 2016. "Cake or fruit? Influencing healthy food choice through the interaction of automatic and instructed mental simulation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 627-644, December.
    5. Stephen S. Holden & Natalina Zlatevska & Chris Dubelaar, 2016. "Whether Smaller Plates Reduce Consumption Depends on Who's Serving and Who's Looking: A Meta-Analysis," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 134-146.
    6. Koert Van Ittersum & Brian Wansink, 2012. "Plate Size and Color Suggestibility: The Delboeuf Illusion's Bias on Serving and Eating Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 215-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:29:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-018-9473-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Mallaigh Nolan). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.