IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v193y2025ics014829632500178x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the most convincing of them all? A systematic literature review on packaging

Author

Listed:
  • Akturan, Ulun
  • Kuter, Deniz
  • Gökkut, B. Selin

Abstract

Packaging stands as a crucial focal point in marketing decisions because, besides being a wrapper for a product, it also fulfills diverse roles: it acts as a medium, affects purchasing behavior, fosters competition, and encourages sustainability. Although there is a vast body of literature on packaging in the marketing literature, a comprehensive understanding of these studies remains limited. This study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, is the first attempt to fill that gap by synthesizing and integrating this diverse knowledge on packaging and developing a research agenda for future studies. In this study, bibliometric research techniques and the SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol were adopted, and 143 studies were analyzed. As a result, we identified seven core themes from 27 years of marketing and consumer behavior-related packaging literature: package format, features, sustainability, label, perception, experience, and redesign. The descriptive findings and the themes were discussed in detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Akturan, Ulun & Kuter, Deniz & Gökkut, B. Selin, 2025. "Mirror, mirror on the wall, who is the most convincing of them all? A systematic literature review on packaging," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s014829632500178x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632500178X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:193:y:2025:i:c:s014829632500178x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.