IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v200y2025i2d10.1007_s10551-024-05901-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CEO Activism and Political Mobilization

Author

Listed:
  • Young Hou

    (University of Virginia Darden School of Business)

  • Christopher Poliquin

    (UCLA Anderson School of Management)

Abstract

CEOs increasingly engage in activism on issues such as gun control, voting rights, and abortion. Although such activism may benefit their firms, the stated goal is often to mobilize the public and precipitate change. In an experiment with 4,578 respondents, we study the effect of CEO activism on people’s willingness to contact their U.S. senators about abortion. On average, showing a CEO message supporting abortion rights is not more effective at mobilizing pro-choice citizens than showing no message or showing a message from other speakers. Additionally, CEOs do not provoke countermobilization by people who oppose abortion. We explore heterogeneous treatment effects and find that CEO activism is better at motivating pro-choice citizens to engage in politics when their senators are Democrats and thus likely receptive to pro-choice activism, consistent with stakeholder alignment theory. Our findings contribute to research on leadership ethics and democracy by examining the ability of CEOs and organizations to foster engagement in the democratic process.

Suggested Citation

  • Young Hou & Christopher Poliquin, 2025. "CEO Activism and Political Mobilization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(2), pages 269-285, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:200:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05901-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05901-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05901-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-024-05901-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Ding & Tirthankar Dasgupta, 2016. "A Potential Tale of Two-by-Two Tables From Completely Randomized Experiments," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 157-168, March.
    2. Thomas M. Holbrook & Scott D. McClurg, 2005. "The Mobilization of Core Supporters: Campaigns, Turnout, and Electoral Composition in United States Presidential Elections," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 689-703, October.
    3. Stephen Ansolabehere & John M. de Figueiredo & James M. Snyder Jr, 2003. "Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 105-130, Winter.
    4. Gaia Melloni & Andrea Patacconi & Nick Vikander, 2023. "Cashing in on the culture wars? CEO activism, wokewashing, and firm value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3098-3121, December.
    5. Stefan Wager & Susan Athey, 2018. "Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1228-1242, July.
    6. Charles S. Taber & Milton Lodge, 2006. "Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(3), pages 755-769, July.
    7. Cummings, Ronald G & Harrison, Glenn W & Rutstrom, E Elisabet, 1995. "Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(1), pages 260-266, March.
    8. Marianne Bertrand & Matilde Bombardini & Raymond Fisman & Francesco Trebbi & Eyub Yegen, 2023. "Investing in Influence: Investors, Portfolio Firms, and Political Giving," NBER Working Papers 30876, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Felix Oberholzer-Gee & Dennis A. Yao, 2018. "Integrated Strategy: Residual Market and Exchange Imperfections as the Foundation of Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 463-480, June.
    10. Druckman, James N. & Peterson, Erik & Slothuus, Rune, 2013. "How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 107(1), pages 57-79, February.
    11. Jūra Liaukonytė & Anna Tuchman & Xinrong Zhu, 2023. "Frontiers: Spilling the Beans on Political Consumerism: Do Social Media Boycotts and Buycotts Translate to Real Sales Impact?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 11-25, January.
    12. Young Hou & Dennis Yao, 2022. "Pushed into a crowd: Repositioning costs, resources, and competition in the RTE cereal industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 3-29, January.
    13. Adam J. Wowak & John R. Busenbark, 2024. "Why Do Some Conservative CEOs Publicly Support Liberal Causes? Organizational Ideology, Managerial Discretion, and CEO Sociopolitical Activism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1388-1408, July.
    14. Young Hou & Christopher W. Poliquin, 2023. "The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 672-703, March.
    15. Aharon Mohliver & Donal Crilly & Aseem Kaul, 2023. "Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1199-1217, May.
    16. Vanessa C. Burbano, 2021. "The Demotivating Effects of Communicating a Social-Political Stance: Field Experimental Evidence from an Online Labor Market Platform," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 1004-1025, February.
    17. Kalla, Joshua & Broockman, David, 2017. "The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments," Research Papers repec:ecl:stabus:3593, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    18. Butler, Daniel M. & Nickerson, David W., 2011. "Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, now publishers, vol. 6(1), pages 55-83, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chung, Sung Hun (Brian) & Odziemkowska, Kate & Piazza, Alessandro, 2024. "Threading the Needle of Corporate Activism: How Firms Frame Their Stances on Polarizing Social Issues," OSF Preprints 2ejyp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    2. Hengda Jin & Kenneth Merkley & Anish Sharma & Karen Ton, 2025. "Customers’ response to firms’ disclosure of social stances: evidence from voting reform laws," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 202-246, March.
    3. Gaia Melloni & Andrea Patacconi & Nick Vikander, 2023. "Cashing in on the culture wars? CEO activism, wokewashing, and firm value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(13), pages 3098-3121, December.
    4. Mochon, Daniel & Schwartz, Janet, 2024. "The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Bryan K. Stroube & David M. Waguespack, 2024. "Status and consensus: Heterogeneity in audience evaluations of female‐ versus male‐lead films," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 994-1024, May.
    6. Preuss, Susanne & Max, Malte M., 2024. "Do firms put their money where their mouth is? Sociopolitical claims and corporate political activity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    7. Monika Pompeo & Nina Serdarevic, 2021. "Is information enough? The case of Republicans and climate change," Discussion Papers 2021-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    8. Barron, Kai & Becker, Anna & Huck, Steffen, 2025. "Motivated political reasoning: On the emergence of belief-value constellations," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 172.
    9. Hermes, Henning & Lergetporer, Philipp & Mierisch, Fabian & Schwerdt, Guido & Wiederhold, Simon, 2024. "Information about inequality in early child care reduces polarization in policy preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Ben M. Tappin & Adam J. Berinsky & David G. Rand, 2023. "Partisans’ receptivity to persuasive messaging is undiminished by countervailing party leader cues," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(4), pages 568-582, April.
    11. Dieter Dekeyser & Henk Roose, 2022. "Polarizing policy opinions with conflict framed information: activating negative views of political parties in a multi-party system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1121-1138, June.
    12. Nikoleta Yordanova & Mariyana Angelova & Roni Lehrer & Moritz Osnabrügge & Sander Renes, 2020. "Swaying citizen support for EU membership: Evidence from a survey experiment of German voters," European Union Politics, , vol. 21(3), pages 429-450, September.
    13. Anahit Mkrtchyan, & Sandvik, Jason & Xu, Da, 2024. "Employee responses to CEO activism," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1).
    14. Young Hou & Christopher W. Poliquin, 2023. "The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 672-703, March.
    15. Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2020. "Labor market concerns and support for immigration," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    16. Toby Bolsen & James N. Druckman & Fay Lomax Cook, 2015. "Citizens’, Scientists’, and Policy Advisors’ Beliefs about Global Warming," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 271-295, March.
    17. Clem Brooks & Elijah Harter, 2021. "Redistribution Preferences, Inequality Information, and Partisan Motivated Reasoning in the United States," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Camille Urvoy, 2024. "Organized Voters: Elections and Public Funding of Nonprofits," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_601, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    19. Nadav G Shelef & Yael Zeira, 2023. "International recognition and support for violence among nonpartisans," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(4), pages 588-603, July.
    20. Erika Franklin Fowler & Sarah E. Gollust, 2015. "The Content and Effect of Politicized Health Controversies," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 155-171, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:200:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05901-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.