IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v190y2024i2d10.1007_s10551-023-05420-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of the Ugly = Bad Stereotype in the Rejection of Misshapen Produce

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Spielmann

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Pierrick Gomez

    (NEOMA Business School)

  • Elizabeth Minton

    (University of Wyoming)

Abstract

A substantial portion of produce harvested around the world is wasted because it does not meet consumers’ shape expectations. Only recently has research begun investigating the causes underlying misshapen produce rejection by consumers. Generally, this limited research has concluded that misshapen produce is subject to an ugly penalty, leading consumers to form biased expectations regarding product attributes (e.g., healthiness, tastiness, or naturalness). In this research, we propose that this ugly penalty extends to the moral valuation of misshapen produce and that this moral penalty is rooted in the feelings of disgust evoked by the visual appearance of such produce. Across five studies and two pilot studies, we show that misshapen fruits and vegetables are disgust elicitors, and that felt disgust causes consumers to make negative moral associations with produce which, in turn, leads to decreased preference. We also show that pairing misshapen produce with a positive unconditioned stimulus (i.e., an image of attractive individuals) is an efficient solution to counteract the effect of this stereotype. This research contributes to the growing body of work demonstrating the link between consumption behaviors, consumer preferences, and morality.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Spielmann & Pierrick Gomez & Elizabeth Minton, 2024. "The Role of the Ugly = Bad Stereotype in the Rejection of Misshapen Produce," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(2), pages 413-437, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:190:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05420-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-023-05420-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-023-05420-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-023-05420-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Galli & Alessio Cavicchi & Gianluca Brunori, 2019. "Food waste reduction and food poverty alleviation: a system dynamics conceptual model," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 289-300, June.
    2. Bree Devin & Carol Richards, 2018. "Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply Chain," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 199-210, June.
    3. Aaron R. Brough & James E. B. Wilkie & Jingjing Ma & Mathew S. Isaac & David Gal, 2016. "Is Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 567-582.
    4. Chelsea Galoni & Gregory S Carpenter & Hayagreeva Rao & J Jeffrey Inman & JoAndrea Hoegg, 2020. "Disgusted and Afraid: Consumer Choices under the Threat of Contagious Disease," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 373-392.
    5. Steven Sweldens & Stijn M. J. Van Osselaer & Chris Janiszewski, 2010. "Evaluative Conditioning Procedures and the Resilience of Conditioned Brand Attitudes," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(3), pages 473-489, October.
    6. Adam Waytz & Ravi Iyer & Liane Young & Jonathan Haidt & Jesse Graham, 2019. "Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Yeonsoo Kim, 2017. "Consumer Responses to the Food Industry’s Proactive and Passive Environmental CSR, Factoring in Price as CSR Tradeoff," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 307-321, January.
    8. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Ilona De Hooge & Pegah Amani & Tino Bech-Larsen & Marije Oostindjer, 2015. "Consumer-Related Food Waste: Causes and Potential for Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Jacob Suher & Courtney Szocs & Koert Ittersum, 2021. "When imperfect is preferred: the differential effect of aesthetic imperfections on choice of processed and unprocessed foods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 903-924, September.
    10. Sydney E. Scott & Paul Rozin, 2020. "Actually, natural is neutral," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 989-990, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gianpaolo Iazzolino & Francesca Guerriero & Luigino Filice & Giorgio Scarpelli, 2023. "A blockchain-based approach for food surplus management," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(7), pages 276-283.
    2. Rudolf Messner & Carol Richards & Hope Johnson, 2020. "The “Prevention Paradox”: food waste prevention and the quandary of systemic surplus production," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 805-817, September.
    3. Saman Attiq & Ka Yin Chau & Shahid Bashir & Muhammad Danish Habib & Rauf I. Azam & Wing-Keung Wong, 2021. "Sustainability of Household Food Waste Reduction: A Fresh Insight on Youth’s Emotional and Cognitive Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Xingyuan Wang & Yaming Wang & Yi Wang, 2021. "The Influence of Infectious Disease Cues on Purchase Intention for Environmentally Friendly Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. S. Wiley Wakeman & George Tsalis & Birger Boutrup Jensen & Jessica Aschemann-Witzel, 2022. "Seeing the Issue Differently (Or Not At All): How Bounded Ethicality Complicates Coordination Towards Sustainability Goals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 325-338, June.
    6. Izabela Karolina Horoś & Tonia Ruppenthal, 2021. "Avoidance of Food Waste from a Grocery Retail Store Owner’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Jin Fan & Hongshu Wang & Xiaolan Zhang, 2022. "A General Equilibrium Analysis of Achieving the Goal of Stable Growth by China’s Market Expectations in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Willems, Kim, 2022. "Brand personality appeal in retailing: Comparing fashion- and grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Francesca Goodman-Smith & Romain Mirosa & Miranda Mirosa, 2020. "Understanding the Effect of Dining and Motivational Factors on Out-Of-Home Consumer Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Francesco Gangi & Mario Mustilli & Lucia Michela Daniele & Maria Coscia, 2022. "The sustainable development of the aerospace industry: Drivers and impact of corporate environmental responsibility," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 218-235, January.
    11. Lisette Ibanez & Sébastien Roussel, 2022. "The impact of nature video exposure on pro-environmental behavior: An experimental investigation," Post-Print hal-03847453, HAL.
    12. Nik Masdek Nik Rozana & Wong Kelly Kai Seng & Mohd Nawi Nolila & Sharifuddin Juwaidah & Wong Wang Li, 2023. "Antecedents of sustainable food waste management behaviour: Empirical evidence from urban households in Malaysia," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 53-77, March.
    13. Daniel Baier & Theresa Maria Rausch & Timm F. Wagner, 2020. "The Drivers of Sustainable Apparel and Sportswear Consumption: A Segmented Kano Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    14. Benjamin Scheibehenne & Jutta Mata & David Richter, 2018. "Accuracy of Food Preference Predictions in Couples," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1003, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    15. Ya‐Ching Lee, 2020. "Communicating sustainable development: Effects of stakeholder‐centric perceived sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1540-1551, July.
    16. Jingjing Wang & Mingyue Li & Sinan Li & Kai Chen, 2022. "Understanding Consumers’ Food Waste Reduction Behavior—A Study Based on Extended Norm Activation Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, April.
    17. Ghosh, R.K. & Eriksson, M. & Istamov, A., 2018. "Food waste due to coercive power in agri-food chains: Evidence from Sweden," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277496, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. René Audet & Éliane Brisebois, 2019. "The Social Production of Food Waste at the Retail-Consumption Interface," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Jianan Li & Xiaotong Jin & Taiyang Zhao & Tiannv Ma, 2021. "Conformity Consumer Behavior and External Threats: An Empirical Analysis in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    20. Valentina Erasmo, 2023. "“Usus pauper”: how early Franciscan economic thought might offer a contribution to the debate about food waste," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 70(3), pages 323-339, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:190:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10551-023-05420-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.