IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiapa/v30y2013i2p447-460.html

Favor prevalence in emerging markets: A multi-level analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Teagarden

  • Andreas Schotter

Abstract

Favors are a medium of exchange for social capital. Social capital creates social, political, and economic benefits for individuals, organizations, communities, and societies around the world. Favors promote cooperation between individuals and are used to bond individual actors with other individuals, groups, communities, and institutions. Favors are prevalent in business in emerging markets because of the presence of institutional voids, limited social and geographic mobility, and strong reciprocity norms. Favors create benefits and liabilities for business organizations and their networks. They produce outcomes beyond the favor exchange process that can be characterized as productive or perverse. Despite their prevalence and importance, favors and their dynamics are not well understood. We explore the antecedents, content, process, and consequences of favors. We conclude our multi-level analysis of favors with a discussion of the “breakeven” point for favors—the point where favors tip from having a positive effect to having a negative effect on organization performance. We present an integrated framework to explain the dynamics of favors in emerging market business contexts, and develop propositions to guide future research. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Teagarden & Andreas Schotter, 2013. "Favor prevalence in emerging markets: A multi-level analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 447-460, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:30:y:2013:i:2:p:447-460
    DOI: 10.1007/s10490-012-9306-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10490-012-9306-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10490-012-9306-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Schotter & Paul W. Beamish, 2011. "General Manager Staffing and Performance in Transitional Economy Subsidiaries," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 55-87, January.
    2. Wilfred Dolfsma & Rene Eijk & Albert Jolink, 2009. "On a Source of Social Capital: Gift Exchange," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 315-329, October.
    3. Gordon Walker & Bruce Kogut & Weijian Shan, 1997. "Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 109-125, April.
    4. Williamson, Oliver E, 1993. "Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 453-486, April.
    5. Matthew O. Jackson & Tomas Rodriguez-Barraquer & Xu Tan, 2012. "Social Capital and Social Quilts: Network Patterns of Favor Exchange," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(5), pages 1857-1897, August.
    6. Ram Mudambi & Pietro Navarra, 2003. "Political culture and foreign direct investment: The case of Italy," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 37-56, April.
    7. Marcus Taylor, 2010. "Conscripts of Competitiveness: culture, institutions and capital in contemporary development," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 561-579.
    8. Seung Ho Park & Yadong Luo, 2001. "Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(5), pages 455-477, May.
    9. Steve Lovett & Lee C Simmons & Raja Kali, 1999. "Guanxi Versus the Market: Ethics and Efficiency," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 30(2), pages 231-247, June.
    10. Peter Li, 2007. "Social tie, social capital, and social behavior: Toward an integrative model of informal exchange," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 227-246, June.
    11. Paul S. Adler, 2001. "Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(2), pages 215-234, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James, Steffan & Liu, Zheng & White, Gareth R.T. & Samuel, Anthony, 2023. "Introducing ethical theory to the triple helix model: Supererogatory acts in crisis innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Inju Yang & Sven Horak, 2019. "Emotions, indigenous affective ties, and social network theory—The case of South Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 395-414, June.
    3. Sven Horak & Arwa Al-Twal & Fadi Alsarhan & Tamer K. Darwish, 2026. "The Virtues and Vices Of Employee Engagement and Its Drivers in an Informal Network Context: A Cultural Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 204(3), pages 623-640, March.
    4. Nikos Bozionelos, 2014. "Careers Patterns in Greek Academia: Social Capital and Intelligent Careers, but for Whom?," Post-Print hal-01016605, HAL.
    5. Dau, Luis Alfonso, 2018. "Contextualizing international learning: The moderating effects of mode of entry & subsidiary networks on the relationship between reforms & profitability," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 403-414.
    6. Khan, Zaheer & Rao-Nicholson, Rekha & Tarba, Shlomo Y., 2018. "Global networks as a mode of balance for exploratory innovations in a late liberalizing economy," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 392-402.
    7. Teagarden, Mary B. & Von Glinow, Mary Ann & Mellahi, Kamel, 2018. "Contextualizing international business research: Enhancing rigor and relevance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 303-306.
    8. Xing, Yijun & Liu, Yipeng & Tarba, Shlomo & Cooper, Sir Cary L., 2017. "Servitization in mergers and acquisitions: Manufacturing firms venturing from emerging markets into advanced economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 9-18.
    9. Boddewyn, Jean J. & Peng, Mike W., 2021. "Reciprocity and informal institutions in international market entry," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    10. Yang, Jie & Yu, Guangsheng & Liu, Mingyu & Xie, Hongming & Liu, Haiwei, 2018. "Disentangling the impact of cost transparency on cooperation efficiency in exchange partnerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 27-34.
    11. Gareth R. T. White & Anthony Samuel & Robert J. Thomas, 2023. "Exploring and Expanding Supererogatory Acts: Beyond Duty for a Sustainable Future," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 665-688, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shijun Chai & Yang Chen & Bihong Huang & Dezhu Ye, 2019. "Social networks and informal financial inclusion in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 529-563, June.
    2. Huatao Peng & Geert Duysters & Bert Sadowski, 2016. "The changing role of guanxi in influencing the development of entrepreneurial companies: a case study of the emergence of pharmaceutical companies in China," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 215-258, March.
    3. Krug, B., 2006. "Enterprise Ground Zero in China," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-024-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    4. Sven Horak & Markus Taube & Inju Yang & Katja Restel, 2019. "Two not of a kind: Social network theory and informal social networks in East Asia," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 349-372, June.
    5. Zhang, Chuang & Du, Nan & Zhang, Xubing, 2021. "When an interfirm relationship is ending: The dark side of managerial ties and relationship intimacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 227-238.
    6. Shou, Zhigang & Chen, Jun & Zhu, Wenting & Yang, Lihua, 2014. "Firm capability and performance in China: The moderating role of guanxi and institutional forces in domestic and foreign contexts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 77-82.
    7. Michael Carney, 2005. "Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family–Controlled Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(3), pages 249-265, May.
    8. Chu, Zhaofang & Feng, Bo & Lai, Fujun, 2018. "Logistics service innovation by third party logistics providers in China: Aligning guanxi and organizational structure," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-307.
    9. Kriz, Anton & Keating, Byron W., 2010. "Business relationships in China: Lessons about deep trust," MPRA Paper 40427, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Zhong Qin & Xin Deng, 2016. "Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: perceptions and preference," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 35-60, January.
    11. Chung, Henry F.L. & Kingshott, Russel P.J. & MacDonald, Robyn V.G. & Putranta, Martinus Parnawa, 2021. "Dynamism and B2B firm performance: The dark and bright contingent role of B2B relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 250-259.
    12. Yanju Zhou & Yi Yu & Xiaohong Chen & Xiongwei Zhou, 2020. "Guanxi or Justice? An Empirical Study of WeChat Voting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 201-225, June.
    13. Ash Amin & Patrick Cohendet, 2012. "The Firm as a ‘Platform of Communities': A Contribution to the Knowledge-based Approach of the Firm," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Alain Verbeke & Liena Kano, 2013. "The transaction cost economics (TCE) theory of trading favors," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 409-431, June.
    15. Dejin Su & Qixia Du & Dongwon Sohn & Libo Xu, 2017. "Can High-Tech Ventures Benefit from Government Guanxi and Business Guanxi ? The Moderating Effects of Environmental Turbulence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Martino, Gaetano, 2010. "Trust, contracting, and adaptation in agri-food hybrid structure," MPRA Paper 37617, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Kenney, Martin & Patton, Donald, 2003. "Innovation and Social Capital in Silicon Valley," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt25w6w54t, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    18. Nathalie Lazaric & Alain Raybaut, 2007. "Knowledge, Hierarchy and incentives: Why human resource policy and trust matter," Post-Print hal-00453292, HAL.
    19. Gilsing, V. & Nooteboom, B., 2004. "Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology," Working Papers 04.16, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    20. Li, Yanlin & Tian, Gary Gang & Wang, Xin, 2021. "The effect of Guanxi culture on the voting of independent directors: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiapa:v:30:y:2013:i:2:p:447-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.