IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v14y2024i4p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing TPACK-English Textbook for Economic Faculty Students

Author

Listed:
  • Widya Syafitri
  • M. Zaim
  • Havid Ardi

Abstract

This study thoroughly investigates the educational needs of Economics students in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), based on a survey of 292 students and 12 alumni from the Economics faculty. The study reveals nuanced linguistic preferences across six fundamental components- task, activity, language use, technology, pedagogy, and topic or content relevancy. The findings show that listening skills, particularly for information acquisition, were highly valued (mean score- 3.01), whereas speaking abilities such as explaining and knowledge elicitation were universally deemed critical (mean scores > 3.00), whereas activities such as making suggestions were deemed less important (mean score- 1.99). The study also identified important areas in economics education, highlighting significant topics such as Economics, Microeconomics, and Islamic Economics (mean scores > 3.00) and the impact of English proficiency levels in maximizing learning experiences. The findings demonstrate a variety of activity priorities, with a focus on collaborative instructional tactics and specific linguistic demands in economic communication. Furthermore, this study explored students’ educational needs and the design of English instructional material for economics faculty students. This design integrates technology, language skills, and economic theory to improve student learning and skill acquisition.

Suggested Citation

  • Widya Syafitri & M. Zaim & Havid Ardi, 2024. "Designing TPACK-English Textbook for Economic Faculty Students," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(4), pages 1-1, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/25130/16163
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/25130
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William B. Walstad, 2001. "Improving Assessment in University Economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 281-294, January.
    2. Omar Rabeea Mahdi & Islam A. Nassar & Hashem Ali Almuslamani, 2020. "The Role of Using Case Studies Method in Improving Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Higher Education," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 297-297, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ishuan Li & Robert Simonson, 2016. "Capstone senior research course in economics," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 161-167, April.
    2. Caroline Elliott & Vudayagi Balasubramanyam, 2016. "Assessing students: Real-world analyses underpinned by economic theory," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1151171-115, December.
    3. Nilss Olekalns, 2002. "The Teaching of First Year Economics in Australian Universities," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 848, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Sheryl B. Ball & Catherine Eckel & Christian Rojas, 2006. "Technology Improves Learning in Large Principles of Economics Classes: Using Our WITS," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(2), pages 442-446, May.
    5. Lourdes Espinoza & Carlos Gustavo Machicado & Katia Makhlouf, 2007. "La Enseñanza de Economía en Bolivia y Chile," Development Research Working Paper Series 10/2007, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
    6. S. Cook & C. Elliott, 2016. "Innovations in Economics Education: An Introduction to Economic and Econometric Tools for Teaching and Learning," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1180038-118, December.
    7. Gordon Menzies & Jonathan Pratt & Susan Thorp & Peter Docherty, 2008. "Piloting a Peer Feedback Program in the Faculty of Business at UTS," Working Paper Series 154, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    8. David H. Dean & Robert C. Dolan, 2011. "Curricular and Co-curricular Aspects of the Economics Major at Highly Ranked Schools," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 69, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Hart Hodges & Yvonne Durham & Steve Henson, 2018. "Economic Education Production Functions for the Principles of Macroeconomics and the Principles of Microeconomics: Is There a Difference?," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 22-41, Fall.
    10. Steven C. Myers & Michael A. Nelson & Richard W. Stratton, 2009. "Assessing An Economics Programme: Hansen Proficiencies, ePortfolio, and Undergraduate Research," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(1), pages 87-105.
    11. Kuhn, Christiane & Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, Olga & Brückner, Sebastian & Saas, Hannes, 2018. "A new video-based tool to enhance teaching economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 24-33.
    12. Yvonne Durham & Thomas Mckinnon & Craig Schulman, 2007. "Classroom Experiments: Not Just Fun And Games," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 45(1), pages 162-178, January.
    13. Carlos Asarta & Ken Rebeck, 2011. "Measurement Techniques of Student Performance and Literacy: College and High School," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Elizabeth Knowles & Glenn Knowles, 2012. "Lessons Learned from a Course-Embedded Assessment Process: Foreign Exchange Markets in Principles of Economics," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 12(1), pages 26-37, Fall.
    15. Steve Onyeiwu & Hoa Nguyen, 2018. "Incorporating Field Trips into the Teaching of Business and Economics: Method and Evaluation," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(2), pages 60-80, Fall.
    16. James Staveley-O'Carroll II, 2023. "Microeconomics for Business: Writing Assignments on Porter’s Five Competitive Forces," Journal of Economics Teaching, Journal of Economics Teaching, vol. 8(3), pages 158-172, October.
    17. Oskar Harmon & James Lambrinos & Judy Buffolino, 2008. "Is the Cheating Risk Always Higher in Online Instruction Compared to Face-to-Face Instruction?," Working papers 2008-14, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2010.
    18. Kenneth Thompson & Richard Conde & Michael Gade & Tina Mims, 2021. "An Immersion Approach to Client-Sponsored Projects: Preparing Students with Soft Skills Required for Hiring - Face to Face & Virtual Methods," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(2), pages 1-42, April.
    19. Walstad, William B. & Bosshardt, William, 2020. "Using Matrix Puzzles to Assess Student Understanding in Economics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    20. Costas Siriopoulos & Gerasimos Pomonis, 2009. "Selecting Strategies to Foster Economists' Critical Thinking Skills: A Quantile Regression Approach," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 8(1), pages 106-131.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.