IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/jbar11/v2y2013i2p39-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Value Contribution of Manufacturing Technology Suppliers

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas V. Scannell
  • Kenneth J. Peterson
  • Sime Curkovic

Abstract

This research examined the value of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) supplier support by testing a structural model that relates need for support with actual support received, and the impact of that support on implementation, operational and business success.? Current research is expanded by simultaneously testing the relationship between these factors in a single model.?? The recent adoption of a specific subset of AMT (CNC/DNC machines and material working lasers/robots), was the unit of analysis.? The proposed model has good statistical fit and the four hypotheses were supported.? Firms adopting new manufacturing technologies benefit from collaborative relationships with manufacturing technology suppliers, suggesting that the service capabilities of technology suppliers be critically evaluated during supplier selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas V. Scannell & Kenneth J. Peterson & Sime Curkovic, 2013. "The Value Contribution of Manufacturing Technology Suppliers," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(2), pages 39-49, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:jbar11:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:39-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/jbar/article/download/3201/2079
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/jbar/article/view/3201
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baldwin, John & Lin, Zhengxi, 2002. "Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Jeffrey G. Miller & Aleda V. Roth, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 285-304, March.
    3. G.S. Dangayach & S.G. Deshmukh, 2004. "Advanced manufacturing technologies: evidences from Indian automobile companies," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(5), pages 426-433.
    4. Thomas Lager, 2010. "The Process Industries," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Managing Process Innovation From Idea Generation to Implementation, volume 17, chapter 2, pages 13-29, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Thomas Lager, 2010. "Success Factors for Process Innovation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Managing Process Innovation From Idea Generation to Implementation, volume 17, chapter 14, pages 281-304, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    7. Thomas Lager, 2010. "Innovation in the Process Industries," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Managing Process Innovation From Idea Generation to Implementation, volume 17, chapter 3, pages 31-55, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Thomas Lager, 2010. "Process Innovation in the Process Industries," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Managing Process Innovation From Idea Generation to Implementation, volume 17, chapter 4, pages 59-85, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Rönnberg Sjödin & P. E. Eriksson, 2010. "Procurement Procedures For Supplier Integration And Open Innovation In Mature Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 655-682.
    2. Onufrey, Ksenia & Bergek, Anna, 2020. "Second wind for exploitation: Pursuing high degrees of product and process innovativeness in mature industries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2014. "Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 173-187.
    5. Donna Marshall & Lucy McCarthy & Marius Claudy & Paul McGrath, 2019. "Piggy in the Middle: How Direct Customer Power Affects First-Tier Suppliers’ Adoption of Socially Responsible Procurement Practices and Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1081-1102, February.
    6. Cho, Young Sik & Linderman, Kevin, 2019. "Metacognition-based process improvement practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 132-144.
    7. Dai, Jing & Montabon, Frank L. & Cantor, David E., 2015. "Reprint of “Linking rival and stakeholder pressure to green supply management: Mediating role of top management support”," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 124-138.
    8. Lee, Peter K.C. & Humphreys, Paul K., 2007. "The role of Guanxi in supply management practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 450-467, April.
    9. Singh, Nitya P. & Hong, Paul C., 2020. "Impact of strategic and operational risk management practices on firm performance: An empirical investigation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 723-735.
    10. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    11. Dai, Jing & Cantor, David E. & Montabon, Frank L., 2017. "Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: A strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 272-280.
    12. Sara Hajmohammad & Stephan Vachon, 2014. "Safety Culture: A Catalyst for Sustainable Development," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 263-281, August.
    13. Curkovic, Sime, 2003. "Environmentally Responsible Manufacturing: The development and validation of a measurement model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 130-155, April.
    14. Oke, Adegoke, 2013. "Linking manufacturing flexibility to innovation performance in manufacturing plants," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(2), pages 242-247.
    15. Young Sik Cho & Kevin Linderman, 2020. "Resource-Based Product and Process Innovation Model: Theory Development and Empirical Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Yoon, Junghyun & Lee, Hee Yong & Dinwoodie, John, 2015. "Competitiveness of container terminal operating companies in South Korea and the industry–university–government network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-14.
    17. Sousa, Carlos M.P. & Bradley, Frank, 2008. "Antecedents of international pricing adaptation and export performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 307-320, July.
    18. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    19. Van Wijk, Raymond & Nadolska, Anna, 2020. "Making more of alliance portfolios: The role of alliance portfolio coordination," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 388-399.
    20. Jarle Aarstad & Olav Andreas Kvitastein & Stig-Erik Jakobsen, 2019. "What Drives Enterprise Product Innovation? Assessing How Regional, National, And International Inter-Firm Collaboration Complement Or Substitute For R&D Investments," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:jbar11:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:39-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grace Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jbar.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.