IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v44y2010i3p322-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-National Differences in Aviation Safety Records

Author

Listed:
  • Arnold Barnett

    (MIT Sloan School of Management, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

Data about the mortality risk of scheduled passenger air travel over 2000--2007 around the world is examined in this paper. Worldwide, the average passenger death risk per scheduled flight over 2000--2007 was about one in 3.0 million. However, much as the center of mass of a doughnut is the center of the hole---where there is no mass---the worldwide average represents the actual risk level in few if any countries. The data support a three-population risk model across nations, in which the differences in death risk are not statistically significant within groups but are highly significant across groups. The safest nations are the traditional first-world countries (e.g., Canada, Japan), with a death risk per flight of about 1 in 14 million. Next safest are those developing-world nations that have either have recently attained first-world status (e.g., Singapore, South Korea) or are classified by experts as newly industrialized (e.g., Brazil, China) Their aggregrate death risk per flight was about 1 in 2 million. The least safe nations statistically are remaining developing-world countries, with a death risk per flight of about 1 in 800,000. In terms of relative risk, divergences within the developing world are modest compared to the overall difference between the first and developing worlds. The observed risk pattern might reflect a confluence of economic and cultural factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnold Barnett, 2010. "Cross-National Differences in Aviation Safety Records," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(3), pages 322-332, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:44:y:2010:i:3:p:322-332
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1090.0313
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.1090.0313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arnold Barnett & Mary K. Higgins, 1989. "Airline Safety: The Last Decade," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daramola, Adebukola Yewande, 2014. "An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 39-50.
    2. Peter M. Madsen & Vinit Desai, 2018. "No Firm Is an Island: The Role of Population-Level Actors in Organizational Learning from Failure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 739-753, August.
    3. Arnold Barnett, 2020. "Aviation Safety: A Whole New World?," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 84-96, January.
    4. Li, Max Z. & Ryerson, Megan S., 2019. "Reviewing the DATAS of aviation research data: Diversity, availability, tractability, applicability, and sources," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 111-130.
    5. Oster, Clinton V. & Strong, John S. & Zorn, C. Kurt, 2013. "Analyzing aviation safety: Problems, challenges, opportunities," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 148-164.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Byungwan Koh & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2010. "An Analysis of the Impact of Passenger Profiling for Transportation Security," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(5), pages 1287-1302, October.
    2. Kwabena Asomanin Anaman & Ruth Quaye & Bernice Owusu-Brown, 2017. "Benefits of Aviation Weather Services: A Review of International Literature," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(1), pages 45-58, June.
    3. Huseyin Cavusoglu & Young Kwark & Bin Mai & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2013. "Passenger Profiling and Screening for Aviation Security in the Presence of Strategic Attackers," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 63-81, March.
    4. Peck, Milo W. & Scheraga, Carl A. & Boisjoly, Russell P., 1998. "Assessing the relative efficiency of aircraft maintenance technologies: an application of data envelopment analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 261-269, May.
    5. David Czerwinski & Arnold Barnett, 2006. "Airlines as Baseball Players: Another Approach for Evaluating an Equal-Safety Hypothesis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(9), pages 1291-1300, September.
    6. Arnold Barnett, 1991. "It's Safer to Fly," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 13-14, March.
    7. Arnold Barnett, 1999. "A "Parallel Approach" Path to Estimating Collision Risk During Simultaneous Landings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 382-394, March.
    8. Leonard Evans & Michael C. Frick & Richard C. Schwing, 1991. "Response to Barnett," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 17-17, March.
    9. McFadden, Kathleen L & Towell, Elizabeth R, 1999. "Aviation human factors: a framework for the new millennium," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 177-184.
    10. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2004. "A new airline safety index," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 369-383, May.
    11. Haunschild, Pamela & Ni, Bilian, 2000. "Learning from Complexity: Effects of Accident/Incident Heterogenity on Airline Learning," Research Papers 1621, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    12. Raghavan, Sunder & Rhoades, Dawna L., 2005. "Revisiting the relationship between profitability and air carrier safety in the US airline industry," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 283-290.
    13. Peter M. Madsen & Vinit Desai, 2018. "No Firm Is an Island: The Role of Population-Level Actors in Organizational Learning from Failure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 739-753, August.
    14. Nancy L. Rose, 1992. "Fear of Flying? Economic Analysis of Airline Safety," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(2), pages 75-94, Spring.
    15. Alexander G. Nikolaev & Sheldon H. Jacobson & Laura A. McLay, 2007. "A Sequential Stochastic Security System Design Problem for Aviation Security," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 182-194, May.
    16. Robin L. Dillon & Blake E. Johnson & M. Elisabeth Patè‐Cornell, 1999. "Risk Assessment Based on Financial Data: Market Response to Airline Accidents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 473-486, June.
    17. Fulton, Neale L. & Westcott, Mark & Emery, Stephen, 2009. "Decision support for risk assessment of mid-air collisions via population-based measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 150-169, February.
    18. Landry, Steven J. & Lagu, Amit & Kinnari, Jouko, 2010. "State-based modeling of continuous human-integrated systems: An application to air traffic separation assurance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 345-353.
    19. Leonard Evans & Michael C. Frick & Richard C. Schwing, 1990. "Is It Safer to Fly or Drive?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 239-246, June.
    20. Gregory Noronha & Vijay Singal, 2004. "Financial health and airline safety," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 1-16.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:44:y:2010:i:3:p:322-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.