IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v35y2024i3p911-927.html

Setting Gendered Expectations? Recruiter Outreach Bias in Online Tech Training Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline N. Lane

    (Technology and Operations Management Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163; Digital, Data, and Design Institute (D 3 ) at Harvard, Allston, Massachusetts 02134)

  • Karim R. Lakhani

    (Technology and Operations Management Unit, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts 02163; Digital, Data, and Design Institute (D 3 ) at Harvard, Allston, Massachusetts 02134)

  • Roberto M. Fernandez

    (Work and Organization Studies, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

Competence development in digital technologies, analytics, and artificial intelligence is increasingly important to all types of organizations and their workforce. Universities and corporations are investing heavily in developing training programs, at all tenure levels, to meet the new skills needs. However, there is a risk that the new set of lucrative opportunities for employees in these tech-heavy fields will be biased against diverse demographic groups like women. Although much research has examined the experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields and occupations, less understood is the extent to which gender stereotypes influence recruiters’ perceptions and evaluations of individuals who are deciding whether to apply to STEM training programs. These behaviors are typically unobserved because they occur prior to the application interface. We address this question by investigating recruiters’ initial outreach decisions to more than 166,000 prospective students who have expressed interest in applying to a midcareer level online tech training program in business analytics. Using data on the recruiters’ communications, our results indicate that recruiters are less likely to initiate contact with female than male prospects and search for additional signals of quality from female prospects before contacting them. We also find evidence that recruiters are more likely to base initial outreach activities on prospect gender when they have higher workloads and limited attention. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this research for our understanding of how screening and selection decisions prior to the application interface may undermine organizational efforts to achieve gender equality and diversity as well as the potential for demand-side interventions to mitigate these gender disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline N. Lane & Karim R. Lakhani & Roberto M. Fernandez, 2024. "Setting Gendered Expectations? Recruiter Outreach Bias in Online Tech Training Programs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 911-927, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:911-927
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.16499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16499
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.16499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo & Zella King, 2011. "Anticipatory Sorting and Gender Segregation in Temporary Employment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 989-1008, June.
    2. David Card & Stefano DellaVigna & Patricia Funk & Nagore Iriberri, 2020. "Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 269-327.
    3. Scott E. Carrell & Marianne E. Page & James E. West, 2010. "Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(3), pages 1101-1144.
    4. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo & Roberto M. Fernandez, 2016. "Bending the Pipeline? Executive Search and Gender Inequality in Hiring for Top Management Jobs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3636-3655, December.
    5. Kanze, Dana & Conley, Mark A. & Higgins, E. Tory, 2021. "The motivation of mission statements: How regulatory mode influences workplace discrimination," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 84-103.
    6. Anja Lambrecht & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 2966-2981, July.
    7. A. Colin Cameron & Pravin K. Trivedi, 1986. "Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(1), pages 29-53, January.
    8. Sofia Bapna & Martin Ganco, 2021. "Gender Gaps in Equity Crowdfunding: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2679-2710, May.
    9. Elizabeth Lauren Campbell & Oliver Hahl, 2022. "He’s Overqualified, She’s Highly Committed: Qualification Signals and Gendered Assumptions About Job Candidate Commitment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2451-2476, November.
    10. David J Deming & Kadeem Noray, 2020. "Earnings Dynamics, Changing Job Skills, and STEM Careers," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(4), pages 1965-2005.
    11. Ioana Marinescu & Ronald Wolthoff, 2020. "Opening the Black Box of the Matching Function: The Power of Words," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 38(2), pages 535-568.
    12. Emilio J. Castilla & Hye Jin Rho, 2023. "The Gendering of Job Postings in the Online Recruitment Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6912-6939, November.
    13. Emilio J. Castilla, 2022. "Gender, Race, and Network Advantage in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 2364-2403, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gokce Basbug & Roberto M. Fernandez, 2025. "Gendered Job Search: An Analysis of Gender Differences in Reservation Wages and Job Applications," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 78(1), pages 217-239, January.
    2. Shen, Jianfei & Wang, Qiqi, 2023. "Do men and women discriminate against women for the same reason? Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Elizabeth Linos & Sanaz Mobasseri & Nina Roussille, 2025. "Intersectional Peer Effects at Work: The Effect of White Coworkers on Black Women’s Careers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7600-7630, September.
    4. Chaturvedi, Sugat & Mahajan, Kanika & Siddique, Zahra, 2025. "Gendered language in job ads and applicant behavior: Evidence from India," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Maciej Berk{e}sewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Robert Pater, 2021. "Estimating the number of entities with vacancies using administrative and online data," Papers 2106.03263, arXiv.org.
    6. Bryan K. Stroube & David M. Waguespack, 2024. "Status and consensus: Heterogeneity in audience evaluations of female‐ versus male‐lead films," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 994-1024, May.
    7. Leung, Ming D., 2017. "Taking a Pass: How Proportional Prejudice and Decisions Not to Hire Reproduce Sex Segregation," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9f2420wj, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    8. Verónica Amarante & Marisa Bucheli & Mar�a In�s Moraes & Tatiana P�rez, 2021. "Women in Research in Economics in Uruguay," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 40(84), pages 763-790.
    9. Ziqiao Ao & Gergely Horvath & Chunyuan Sheng & Yifan Song & Yutong Sun, 2022. "Skill requirements in job advertisements: A comparison of skill-categorization methods based on explanatory power in wage regressions," Papers 2207.12834, arXiv.org.
    10. Sara Ayllón & Lars J. Lefgren & Richard W. Patterson & Olga B. Stoddard & Nicolás Urdaneta Andrade, 2025. "‘Sorting’ Out Gender Discrimination and Disadvantage: Evidence from Student Evaluations of Teaching," NBER Working Papers 33911, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Isabel Fernandez-Mateo & Brian Rubineau & Venkat Kuppuswamy, 2023. "Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1554-1576, July.
    12. Brandts, Jordi & Rott, Christina, 2021. "Advice from women and men and selection into competition," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    13. Shinjae Won & Matthew Bidwell, 2023. "Finding the right path to the top: How past interorganizational moves impact executive selection outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(10), pages 2341-2376, October.
    14. Emilio J. Castilla & Hye Jin Rho, 2023. "The Gendering of Job Postings in the Online Recruitment Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 6912-6939, November.
    15. Valentina Paredes & M. Daniele Paserman & Francisco J. Pino, 2025. "Does Economics Make You Sexist?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(5), pages 1247-1259, September.
    16. Pruckner, Gerald J. & Stiftinger, Flora & Zocher, Katrin, 2025. "When women take over: Physician gender and health care provision," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    17. Barth, Erling & Davis, James C. & Freeman, Richard B. & McElheran, Kristina, 2023. "Twisting the demand curve: Digitalization and the older workforce," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 443-467.
    18. Tristan L. Botelho & Marina Gertsberg, 2022. "The Disciplining Effect of Status: Evaluator Status Awards and Observed Gender Bias in Evaluations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5311-5329, July.
    19. Maciej Beręsewicz & Herman Cherniaiev & Andrzej Mantaj & Robert Pater, 2024. "Text analysis of job offers for mismatch of educational characteristics to labour market demands," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1799-1825, April.
    20. Boris Groysberg & Paul Healy & Eric Lin, 2022. "Determinants of Gender Differences in Change in Pay among Job-Switching Executives," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(1), pages 168-199, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:35:y:2024:i:3:p:911-927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.