IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v34y2023i2p754-776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Do Firms Crack Under Pressure? Legal Professionals, Negative Role Models, and Organizational Misconduct

Author

Listed:
  • Leroy Gonsalves

    (Management and Organizations, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215)

Abstract

Strain theory has long been invoked to explain organizational misconduct, with underperformance creating pressure for firms to engage in morally objectionable activities. In this paper, I examine whether underperformance increases the risk of organizational misconduct. Drawing on institutional arguments about professions and social learning, I further predict that when experiencing performance strain, legal professionals will push the boundaries of the law, increasing the risk of misconduct if they have influence over decision making. However, industry peers caught engaging in misconduct should serve as negative role models, reducing the risk of the firm resorting to misconduct to overcome performance shortfalls. I test and find support for these predictions using longitudinal data on material legal claims filed against S&P 1500 firms between 2000 and 2017. The study extends the strain theory of organizational misconduct, identifying how legal professionals and negative role models shape firms’ strategic responses to performance pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Leroy Gonsalves, 2023. "When Do Firms Crack Under Pressure? Legal Professionals, Negative Role Models, and Organizational Misconduct," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 754-776, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:754-776
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2022.1597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1597
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2022.1597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:34:y:2023:i:2:p:754-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.