IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v44y2025i1p65-83.html

Asymmetric Impact of Matching Technology on Influencer Marketing: Implications for Platform Revenue

Author

Listed:
  • Jessie Liu

    (Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21202)

  • Yi Liu

    (Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53715)

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of using advanced technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) to match marketers with social media influencers. We develop a theoretical model to examine how matching accuracy affects the competition between influencers and the profitability of a social media platform. Our findings show that improving matching accuracy may not always benefit the platform, especially for platforms with intermediate follower density. Two opposing effects of technology improvement affect the prices of influencer marketing campaigns: advanced technology, such as AI, enhances the matching between influencers and marketers and also intensifies competition between different types of influencers. The overall effect on prices can be negative for some influencers because of the asymmetric nature of such matching technology: the matching outcome for influencers with a narrower audience (niche influencers) is more sensitive to matching accuracy than that for those with a broader audience (general influencers). As a result, more niche influencers begin to participate in marketing campaigns when matching accuracy improves, which reduces the prices offered by sufficiently general influencers and may lead to a decline in platform revenue. Additionally, we find that adjusting commission rates in response to technology improvements could help mitigate the negative impact although it may not eliminate it entirely. Our findings offer valuable insights for social media platforms seeking to remain competitive in the influencer marketing landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessie Liu & Yi Liu, 2025. "Asymmetric Impact of Matching Technology on Influencer Marketing: Implications for Platform Revenue," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 65-83, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:1:p:65-83
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2023.0211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0211
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2023.0211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dokyun Lee & Kartik Hosanagar, 2019. "How Do Recommender Systems Affect Sales Diversity? A Cross-Category Investigation via Randomized Field Experiment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 239-259, March.
    2. Kaifu Zhang & Zsolt Katona, 2012. "Contextual Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 980-994, November.
    3. Campbell, Colin & Farrell, Justine Rapp, 2020. "More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 469-479.
    4. Anja Lambrecht & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study of Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(7), pages 2966-2981, July.
    5. Amy Pei & Dina Mayzlin, 2022. "Influencing Social Media Influencers Through Affiliation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 593-615, May.
    6. Steven C. Salop, 1979. "Monopolistic Competition with Outside Goods," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 141-156, Spring.
    7. Yongmin Chen & Chuan He, 2011. "Paid Placement: Advertising and Search on the Internet," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(556), pages 309-328, November.
    8. Amin Sayedi & Kinshuk Jerath & Kannan Srinivasan, 2014. "Competitive Poaching in Sponsored Search Advertising and Its Strategic Impact on Traditional Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 586-608, July.
    9. Nada Ben Elhadj-Ben Brahim & Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2014. "Is Targeted Advertising always Beneficial?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kaddour Hadri & William Mikhail (ed.), Econometric Methods and Their Applications in Finance, Macro and Related Fields, chapter 20, pages 551-585, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. Jeanine Miklós-Thal & Catherine Tucker, 2019. "Collusion by Algorithm: Does Better Demand Prediction Facilitate Coordination Between Sellers?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1552-1561, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Sanxi & Sun, Hailin & Yu, Jun, 2023. "Competitive targeted online advertising," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Roberto Burguet & Vaiva Petrikaitė, 2023. "Targeted advertising and costly consumer search," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(2), pages 430-450, April.
    3. Alexandre de Corniere, 2013. "Search Advertising," Economics Series Working Papers 649, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    4. Alex Jiyoung Kim & Subramanian Balachander, 2023. "Coordinating traditional media advertising and online advertising in brand marketing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1865-1879, June.
    5. Fei Long & Kinshuk Jerath & Miklos Sarvary, 2022. "Designing an Online Retail Marketplace: Leveraging Information from Sponsored Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 115-138, January.
    6. Zhao Jiang & Dan Wu, 2022. "Targeting Precision in Imperfect Targeted Advertising: Implications for the Regulation of Market Structure and Efficiency," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    7. Shijie Lu & Yi Zhu & Anthony Dukes, 2015. "Position Auctions with Budget Constraints: Implications for Advertisers and Publishers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 897-905, November.
    8. Xiang He & Li Li & Di Wang & Zonghuo Li, 2025. "Advertising bidding involving consumer information sharing," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1033-1066, April.
    9. Benevento, Elisabetta & Aloini, Davide & Roma, Paolo & Bellino, Davide, 2025. "The impact of influencers on brand social network growth: Insights from new product launch events on Twitter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Wang, Wei & Li, Gang & Fung, Richard Y.K. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2019. "Mobile Advertising and Traffic Conversion: The Effects of Front Traffic and Spatial Competition," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 84-101.
    11. Zhanhong Cui & Kai Li, 2024. "Two‐sided markets: The influence of market power on information utilization strategy and welfare," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(1), pages 98-117, January.
    12. Joan Calzada & Nestor Duch-Brown & Ricard Gil, 2021. "Do search engines increase concentration in media markets?," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2021/415, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    13. Barak Libai & Ana Babić Rosario & Maximilian Beichert & Bas Donkers & Michael Haenlein & Reto Hofstetter & P. K. Kannan & Ralf Lans & Andreas Lanz & H. Alice Li & Dina Mayzlin & Eitan Muller & Daniel , 2025. "Influencer marketing unlocked: Understanding the value chains driving the creator economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 4-28, January.
    14. Hangcheng Zhao & Ron Berman, 2025. "Algorithmic Collusion of Pricing and Advertising on E-commerce Platforms," Papers 2508.08325, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    15. Pepall, Lynne & Richards, Daniel, 2025. "Targeted advertising, concentration, and consumer welfare," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Xiaomeng Du & Meng Su & Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang & Xiaona Zheng, 2017. "Bidding for Multiple Keywords in Sponsored Search Advertising: Keyword Categories and Match Types," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 711-722, December.
    17. Alexandre de Cornière, 2016. "Search Advertising," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 156-188, August.
    18. Jiwoong Shin & Jungju Yu, 2021. "Targeted Advertising and Consumer Inference," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 900-922, September.
    19. Laura Abrardi & Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 969-991, September.
    20. Zhang, Jianqiang & He, Xiuli, 2019. "Targeted advertising by asymmetric firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 136-150.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:44:y:2025:i:1:p:65-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.