IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v43y2024i2p254-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frontiers: Determining the Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Perceptual Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Peiyao Li

    (Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Noah Castelo

    (Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6, Canada)

  • Zsolt Katona

    (Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Miklos Sarvary

    (Columbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) to substitute for human participants in market research. Such LLMs can be used to generate text given a prompt. We argue that perceptual analysis is a particularly promising use case for such automated market research for certain product categories. The proposed new method generates outputs that closely match those generated from human surveys: agreement rates between human- and LLM- generated data sets reach over 75%. Moreover, this applies for perceptual analysis based on both brand similarity measures and product attribute ratings. The paper demonstrates that, for some categories, this new method of fully or partially automated market research will increase the efficiency of market research by meaningfully speeding up the process and potentially reducing the cost. Further results also suggest that with an ever larger training corpus applied to large language models, LLM-based market research will be applicable to answer more nuanced questions based on demographic variables or contextual variation that would be prohibitively expensive or infeasible with human respondents.

Suggested Citation

  • Peiyao Li & Noah Castelo & Zsolt Katona & Miklos Sarvary, 2024. "Frontiers: Determining the Validity of Large Language Models for Automated Perceptual Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 254-266, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:2:p:254-266
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2023.0454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2023.0454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:2:p:254-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.