IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v11y2000i3p241-259.html

The Performance Impacts of Quick Response and Strategic Alignment in Specialty Retailing

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan W. Palmer

    (Decision & Information Technologies, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, 4348 Van Munching Hall, College Park, Maryland 20742)

  • M. Lynne Markus

    (Peter F. Drucker Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University, 1021 North Dartmouth Street, Claremont, California 91711)

Abstract

The Quick Response (QR) program is a hierarchical suite of information technologies (IT) and applications designed to improve the performance of retailers. Consultants advise retailers to adopt the program wholesale, implying that more and higher levels of technology are better than less technology and lower levels. Academicians, on the other hand, argue that good technology is “appropriate” technology. That is firms should adopt only those technologies that suit the specific strategic directions pursued by the firm. Who is right? Which approach to investing in IT yields better performance results? Surprisingly, this cross-sectional survey of 80 specialty retailers found more support for the practitioners' claims than for the academicians'. Adoption of the QR program at a minimal level was associated with higher performance, although there was no performance impact due to higher levels of QR use. Firms did appear to match their IT usage to their business strategies, but there was no linkage between strategic alignment and firm performance, and there was surprisingly little variation in business or IT strategy. In short, the findings of our study suggest that both practitioners and academicians need to refine their theories and advice about what makes IT investments pay off.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan W. Palmer & M. Lynne Markus, 2000. "The Performance Impacts of Quick Response and Strategic Alignment in Specialty Retailing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 241-259, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:11:y:2000:i:3:p:241-259
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.11.3.241.12203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.3.241.12203
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.11.3.241.12203?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sidney E. Harris & Joseph L. Katz, 1991. "Organizational Performance and Information Technology Investment Intensity in the Insurance Industry," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 263-295, August.
    2. Yolande E. Chan & Sid L. Huff & Donald W. Barclay & Duncan G. Copeland, 1997. "Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 125-150, June.
    3. Anitesh Barua & Byungtae Lee, 1997. "An Economic Analysis of the Introduction of an Electronic Data Interchange System," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 398-422, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olivera Marjanovic & Vijaya Murthy, 2016. "From product-centric to customer-centric services in a financial institution – exploring the organizational challenges of the transition process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 479-497, June.
    2. Maria-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina & Irene Gil-Saura & Beatriz Moliner-Velázquez, 2011. "Does technology make a difference? Evidence from Spanish hotels," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, March.
    3. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Sridhar R. Tayur, 2003. "Models for Supply Chains in E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1387-1406, October.
    4. Viktoria Rajnak & Thomas Puschmann, 2021. "The impact of blockchain on business models in banking," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 809-861, September.
    5. I. Zouaghi & A. Spalanzani, 2011. "Les effets de la dynamique relationnelle inter-organisationnelle sur l'alignement des systèmes d'information au sein d'une supply chain," Post-Print halshs-00665712, HAL.
    6. Jun Tian & Kanliang Wang & Yan Chen & Björn Johansson, 2010. "From IT deployment capabilities to competitive advantage: An exploratory study in China," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 239-255, July.
    7. Terence J. V. Saldanha & Dongwon Lee & Sunil Mithas, 2020. "Aligning Information Technology and Business: The Differential Effects of Alignment During Investment Planning, Delivery, and Change," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 1260-1281, December.
    8. Jinhwan Kim & Hyeob Kim & HyukJun Kwon, 2020. "The Impact of Employees’ Perceptions of Strategic Alignment on Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation of Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Hassan Alghamdi & Lily Sun, 2017. "Business and IT Alignment in Higher Education Sector," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 3(1), pages 01-08.
    10. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.
    11. Viktoria Rajnak & Thomas Puschmann, 0. "The impact of blockchain on business models in banking," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-53.
    12. Gil-Saura, Irene & Berenguer-Contrí, Gloria & Ruiz-Molina, María-Eugenia, 2009. "Information and communication technology in retailing: A cross-industry comparison," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 232-238.
    13. Nikola Drašković & Milivoj Marković & Christian Petersen, 2018. "The Early Days of Swatch: Birth of the Fast Fashion Watch Business Model," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 30(1), pages 93-108.
    14. Tambo, Torben, 2014. "Collaboration on technological innovation in Danish fashion chains: A network perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 827-835.
    15. Artur Siurdyban, 2014. "Understanding the IT/business partnership: A business process perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 909-922, November.
    16. Lo, Wei-Shuo & Hong, Tzung-Pei & Jeng, Rong, 2008. "A framework of E-SCM multi-agent systems in the fashion industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 594-614, August.
    17. Chiu, Chia-Nan & Yang, Cheng-Liang, 2019. "Competitive advantage and simultaneous mutual influences between information technology adoption and service innovation: Moderating effects of environmental factors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 192-205.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui-Ling Huang, 2014. "Performance effects of aligning service innovation and the strategic use of information technology," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(2), pages 171-195, June.
    2. Ágnes Szukits, 2022. "The illusion of data-driven decision making – The mediating effect of digital orientation and controllers’ added value in explaining organizational implications of advanced analytics," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 403-446, September.
    3. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2965 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Hilal Atasoy & Rajiv D. Banker & Paul A. Pavlou, 2016. "On the Longitudinal Effects of IT Use on Firm-Level Employment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 6-26, March.
    5. Rajiv Kohli & Sarv Devaraj, 2003. "Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 127-145, June.
    6. Alexander Frey & Manuel Trenz & Daniel Veit, 2019. "A service-dominant logic perspective on the roles of technology in service innovation: uncovering four archetypes in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(8), pages 1149-1189, December.
    7. Byrd, T. A. & Marshall, T. E., 1997. "Relating information technology investment to organizational performance: a causal model analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 43-56, February.
    8. Rai, A. & Patnayakuni, R. & Patnayakuni, N., 1996. "Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: An empirical investigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 399-412, August.
    9. Gunnarsson, Gudmundur & Mellander, Erik & Savvidou, Eleni, 2004. "Human capital is the key to the IT productivity paradox," Working Paper Series 2004:13, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    10. King, William R. & Teo, Thompson S. H., 2000. "Assessing the impact of proactive versus reactive modes of strategic information systems planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 667-679, December.
    11. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    12. Arndt, Channing & Schiller, Rico & Tarp, Finn, 2001. "Grain transport and rural credit in Mozambique: solving the space-time problem," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 59-70, June.
    13. Stefan Schweikl & Robert Obermaier, 2020. "Lessons from three decades of IT productivity research: towards a better understanding of IT-induced productivity effects," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 461-507, November.
    14. Basaglia, Stefano & Caporarello, Leonardo & Magni, Massimo & Pennarola, Ferdinando, 2010. "IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 542-551.
    15. Elango, B. & Talluri, Srinivas (Sri), 2023. "A study of the impact of cultural dimensions on the operational orientation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    16. Mesbah, Neda & Tauchert, Christoph & Buxmann, Peter, 2021. "Whose Advice Counts More – Man or Machine? An Experimental Investigation of AI-based Advice Utilization," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124796, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Ling Xue & Gautam Ray & Xia Zhao, 2017. "Managerial Incentives and IT Strategic Posture," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 180-198, March.
    18. Georgios Vousinas, 2012. "it & Economic Performance a Critical Review of the Empirical Data," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 3(2), pages 48-59, April.
    19. Singh, Inderjeet & Lila, Anshu, 2012. "Emerging Structure of Rajasthan Economy in India," MPRA Paper 43522, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Dec 2012.
    20. Brusset, Xavier, 2016. "Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P1), pages 46-59.
    21. Soojung Oh & Young U. Ryu & Hongsuk Yang, 2019. "Interaction effects between supply chain capabilities and information technology on firm performance," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 91-106, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:11:y:2000:i:3:p:241-259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.