IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v52y2022i4p344-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operations Research Helps the Optimal Bidding of Virtual Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Daeho Kim

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea)

  • Hyungkyu Cheon

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea)

  • Dong Gu Choi

    (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea; Open Innovation Big Data Center, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Gyeongbuk 37673, Republic of Korea)

  • Seongbin Im

    (H Energy Co. Ltd., Gyeongbuk 37666, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

As distributed energy resources (DERs) continue to emerge, a new cloud-based information technology platform business model, the virtual power plant (VPP), is being introduced into the electricity market. The competitiveness of VPPs mainly depends on data analytics and operational technologies. Among the several operational problems, we focus on the optimal bidding decision problem in the day-ahead market. The bidding decision is a VPP’s commitment to supply the market with electricity from uncertain DERs, thereby affecting the VPP’s profits. Based on a collaboration with a VPP company in South Korea, H Energy Co. Ltd., we formulate a Markov decision process model for the problem and use a stochastic dynamic programming-based solution approach. This is the first study under the incentive-based market structure. To describe the uncertainty in the power supply from DERs, we build frameworks to generate scenario trees or lattices. Additionally, we apply heuristic techniques to reduce the computational burden. Through a pilot test based on real data, we verify the performance and practicality of our proposed model and solution approach. The case company has begun implementing the model and solution approach on its platform and has found that performance has improved after using advanced forecasting models for DERs.

Suggested Citation

  • Daeho Kim & Hyungkyu Cheon & Dong Gu Choi & Seongbin Im, 2022. "Operations Research Helps the Optimal Bidding of Virtual Power Plants," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 344-362, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:52:y:2022:i:4:p:344-362
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.2022.1120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.1120
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.2022.1120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meng Liu & Erik Brynjolfsson & Jason Dowlatabadi, 2021. "Do Digital Platforms Reduce Moral Hazard? The Case of Uber and Taxis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4665-4685, August.
    2. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    3. Ju, Liwei & Tan, Zhongfu & Yuan, Jinyun & Tan, Qingkun & Li, Huanhuan & Dong, Fugui, 2016. "A bi-level stochastic scheduling optimization model for a virtual power plant connected to a wind–photovoltaic–energy storage system considering the uncertainty and demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 184-199.
    4. Zamani, Ali Ghahgharaee & Zakariazadeh, Alireza & Jadid, Shahram, 2016. "Day-ahead resource scheduling of a renewable energy based virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 324-340.
    5. Clay Campaigne & Shmuel S. Oren, 2016. "Firming renewable power with demand response: an end-to-end aggregator business model," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 1-37, August.
    6. Harish Guda & Upender Subramanian, 2019. "Your Uber Is Arriving: Managing On-Demand Workers Through Surge Pricing, Forecast Communication, and Worker Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1995-2014, May.
    7. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    8. Kai Huang & Shabbir Ahmed, 2009. "The Value of Multistage Stochastic Programming in Capacity Planning Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 893-904, August.
    9. Gordon Burtch & Yili Hong & Ravi Bapna & Vladas Griskevicius, 2018. "Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2065-2082, May.
    10. Wozabal, David & Rameseder, Gunther, 2020. "Optimal bidding of a virtual power plant on the Spanish day-ahead and intraday market for electricity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 639-655.
    11. Kjetil Høyland & Stein W. Wallace, 2001. "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 295-307, February.
    12. Ottesen, Stig Ødegaard & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2018. "Multi market bidding strategies for demand side flexibility aggregators in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 120-134.
    13. Jeffrey D. Camm & Amitabh S. Raturi & Shigeru Tsubakitani, 1990. "Cutting Big M Down to Size," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 61-66, October.
    14. Fazlalipour, Pary & Ehsan, Mehdi & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2019. "Risk-aware stochastic bidding strategy of renewable micro-grids in day-ahead and real-time markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 689-700.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Mohammad Mohammadi Roozbehani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Saeed Hasanzadeh & Seifeddine Ben Elghali, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Operational Strategies: Models, Markets, Optimization, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Amit Kumer Podder & Sayemul Islam & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Pulivarthi Nageswara Rao & Kushal A. Prasad & T. Logeswaran & Kabir A. Mamun, 2020. "Systematic Categorization of Optimization Strategies for Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-46, November.
    4. Silva, Ana R. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2022. "A multistage stochastic approach for the optimal bidding of variable renewable energy in the day-ahead, intraday and balancing markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    5. Chen, Xiqun (Michael) & Zheng, Hongyu & Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Dynamic optimization strategies for on-demand ride services platform: Surge pricing, commission rate, and incentives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 23-45.
    6. Boris Defourny & Damien Ernst & Louis Wehenkel, 2013. "Scenario Trees and Policy Selection for Multistage Stochastic Programming Using Machine Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 488-501, August.
    7. Younes Zahraoui & Tarmo Korõtko & Argo Rosin & Hannes Agabus, 2023. "Market Mechanisms and Trading in Microgrid Local Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-52, February.
    8. Jikai Zou & Shabbir Ahmed & Xu Andy Sun, 2018. "Partially Adaptive Stochastic Optimization for Electric Power Generation Expansion Planning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 388-401, May.
    9. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    10. Salkuti, Surender Reddy, 2019. "Day-ahead thermal and renewable power generation scheduling considering uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 956-965.
    11. Soheil Ghili & Vineet Kumar, 2020. "Spatial Distribution of Supply and the Role of Market Thickness: Theory and Evidence from Ride Sharing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2219R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Aug 2020.
    12. Sun, Xiaojie & Tang, Wansheng & Chen, Jing & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2020. "Optimal investment strategy of a free-floating sharing platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Meijian Yang & Enjun Xia, 2021. "A Systematic Literature Review on Pricing Strategies in the Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, August.
    14. Nickel, Stefan & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco & Ziegler, Hans-Peter, 2012. "A multi-stage stochastic supply network design problem with financial decisions and risk management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 511-524.
    15. Tang, Wei & Xie, Ningke & Mo, Dong & Cai, Zeen & Lee, Der-Horng & Chen, Xiqun (Michael), 2023. "Optimizing subsidy strategies of the ride-sourcing platform under government regulation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Yongwook Paik & Christos A. Makridis, 2023. "The social value of a ridesharing platform: a hedonic pricing approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(5), pages 2125-2150, May.
    17. Omar Besbes & Francisco Castro & Ilan Lobel, 2021. "Surge Pricing and Its Spatial Supply Response," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1350-1367, March.
    18. Fang, Fang & Yu, Songyuan & Liu, Mingxi, 2020. "An improved Shapley value-based profit allocation method for CHP-VPP," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Wei, Congying & Xu, Jian & Liao, Siyang & Sun, Yuanzhang & Jiang, Yibo & Ke, Deping & Zhang, Zhen & Wang, Jing, 2018. "A bi-level scheduling model for virtual power plants with aggregated thermostatically controlled loads and renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 659-670.
    20. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:52:y:2022:i:4:p:344-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.