IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i9p2121-d1385709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reliability and Profitability of Virtual Power Plant with Short-Term Power Market Trading and Non-Spinning Reserve Diesel Generator

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Nadimi

    (Department of Innovation Science, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 3-3-6, Shibaura, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0023, Japan)

  • Masahito Takahashi

    (Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Ōtemachi, Tokyo 100-8126, Japan)

  • Koji Tokimatsu

    (Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan)

  • Mika Goto

    (Department of Innovation Science, School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 3-3-6, Shibaura, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0023, Japan)

Abstract

This study examines the profitability and reliability of a virtual power plant (VPP) with the existence of a diesel genset (DG) in the day-ahead (DA) and intra-day (ID) power markets. The study’s unique contribution lies in integrating the VPP system with non-spinning reserve DG while limiting the DG operation via minimum running time and maximum number of switching times (on/off) per day. This contribution decreases the renewables’ uncertainty and increases the VPP’s reliability. Moreover, the study proposes an optimization model as a decision-making support tool for power market participants to choose the most profitable short-term market. The proposed model suggests choosing the DA market in 62% of time (from 579 days) based on estimated VPP power supply, and market prices. Even though there is uncertainty about VPP power supply and market prices, the division between the plan and actual profits is 1.8 × 10 6 Japanese yen [JPY] per day on average. The share of surplus power sold from the mentioned gap is 5.5%, which implies the opportunity cost of inaccurate weather forecasting. The results also show that the reliability of the VPP system in the presence of a DG increases from 64.9% to 66.2% for 14 h and mitigates the loss of power load by 1.3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Nadimi & Masahito Takahashi & Koji Tokimatsu & Mika Goto, 2024. "The Reliability and Profitability of Virtual Power Plant with Short-Term Power Market Trading and Non-Spinning Reserve Diesel Generator," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2121-:d:1385709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lambert, Mathieu & Hassani, Rachid, 2023. "Diesel genset optimization in remote microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    2. Wang, Qi & Zhang, Chunyu & Ding, Yi & Xydis, George & Wang, Jianhui & Østergaard, Jacob, 2015. "Review of real-time electricity markets for integrating Distributed Energy Resources and Demand Response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 695-706.
    3. Abiodun, Kehinde & Hood, Karoline & Cox, John L. & Newman, Alexandra M. & Zolan, Alex J., 2023. "The value of concentrating solar power in ancillary services markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    4. Kwag, Hyung-Geun & Kim, Jin-O, 2014. "Reliability modeling of demand response considering uncertainty of customer behavior," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 24-33.
    5. Le, Hong Lam & Ilea, Valentin & Bovo, Cristian, 2019. "Integrated European intra-day electricity market: Rules, modeling and analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 258-273.
    6. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    7. Hobbs, Benjamin F., 1995. "Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Zamani, Ali Ghahgharaee & Zakariazadeh, Alireza & Jadid, Shahram, 2016. "Day-ahead resource scheduling of a renewable energy based virtual power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 324-340.
    9. Kikuchi, Yuka & Ishihara, Takeshi, 2023. "Assessment of capital expenditure for fixed-bottom offshore wind farms using probabilistic engineering cost model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    10. Wozabal, David & Rameseder, Gunther, 2020. "Optimal bidding of a virtual power plant on the Spanish day-ahead and intraday market for electricity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 280(2), pages 639-655.
    11. Yu, Songyuan & Fang, Fang & Liu, Yajuan & Liu, Jizhen, 2019. "Uncertainties of virtual power plant: Problems and countermeasures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 454-470.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiaqi Liu & Hongji Hu & Samson S. Yu & Hieu Trinh, 2023. "Virtual Power Plant with Renewable Energy Sources and Energy Storage Systems for Sustainable Power Grid-Formation, Control Techniques and Demand Response," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Naval, Natalia & Yusta, Jose M., 2021. "Virtual power plant models and electricity markets - A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    3. Daeho Kim & Hyungkyu Cheon & Dong Gu Choi & Seongbin Im, 2022. "Operations Research Helps the Optimal Bidding of Virtual Power Plants," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 344-362, July.
    4. Gabriella Ferruzzi & Giorgio Graditi & Federico Rossi, 2020. "A joint approach for strategic bidding of a microgrid in energy and spinning reserve markets," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(1), pages 88-115, February.
    5. Ussama Assad & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Umar Farooq & Asif Kabir & Muhammad Zeeshan Khan & S. Sabahat H. Bukhari & Zain ul Abidin Jaffri & Judit Oláh & József Popp, 2022. "Smart Grid, Demand Response and Optimization: A Critical Review of Computational Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-36, March.
    6. Mohseni, Soheil & Brent, Alan C. & Kelly, Scott & Browne, Will N., 2022. "Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Hussein Jumma Jabir & Jiashen Teh & Dahaman Ishak & Hamza Abunima, 2018. "Impacts of Demand-Side Management on Electrical Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Howell, Shaun & Rezgui, Yacine & Hippolyte, Jean-Laurent & Jayan, Bejay & Li, Haijiang, 2017. "Towards the next generation of smart grids: Semantic and holonic multi-agent management of distributed energy resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 193-214.
    9. Martin Bichler & Hans Ulrich Buhl & Johannes Knörr & Felipe Maldonado & Paul Schott & Stefan Waldherr & Martin Weibelzahl, 2022. "Electricity Markets in a Time of Change: A Call to Arms for Business Research," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 77-102, March.
    10. Wafa Nafkha-Tayari & Seifeddine Ben Elghali & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Mohamed Benbouzid, 2022. "Virtual Power Plants Optimization Issue: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Solutions, and Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Catra Indra Cahyadi & Suwarno Suwarno & Aminah Asmara Dewi & Musri Kona & Muhammad Arif & Muhammad Caesar Akbar, 2023. "Solar Prediction Strategy for Managing Virtual Power Stations," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 503-512, July.
    12. Pedro Faria & Zita Vale, 2019. "A Demand Response Approach to Scheduling Constrained Load Shifting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Lasemi, Mohammad Ali & Arabkoohsar, Ahmad, 2020. "Optimal operating strategy of high-temperature heat and power storage system coupled with a wind farm in energy market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    14. Zahid Ullah & Arshad & Hany Hassanin, 2022. "Modeling, Optimization, and Analysis of a Virtual Power Plant Demand Response Mechanism for the Internal Electricity Market Considering the Uncertainty of Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Mohammad Mohammadi Roozbehani & Ehsan Heydarian-Forushani & Saeed Hasanzadeh & Seifeddine Ben Elghali, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Operational Strategies: Models, Markets, Optimization, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.
    16. Natalia Naval & Jose M. Yusta, 2020. "Water-Energy Management for Demand Charges and Energy Cost Optimization of a Pumping Stations System under a Renewable Virtual Power Plant Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Gao, Hongchao & Jin, Tai & Feng, Cheng & Li, Chuyi & Chen, Qixin & Kang, Chongqing, 2024. "Review of virtual power plant operations: Resource coordination and multidimensional interaction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    18. Bianca Goia & Tudor Cioara & Ionut Anghel, 2022. "Virtual Power Plant Optimization in Smart Grids: A Narrative Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, April.
    19. Amit Kumer Podder & Sayemul Islam & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar & Aneesh A. Chand & Pulivarthi Nageswara Rao & Kushal A. Prasad & T. Logeswaran & Kabir A. Mamun, 2020. "Systematic Categorization of Optimization Strategies for Virtual Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-46, November.
    20. Mahmud, Khizir & Khan, Behram & Ravishankar, Jayashri & Ahmadi, Abdollah & Siano, Pierluigi, 2020. "An internet of energy framework with distributed energy resources, prosumers and small-scale virtual power plants: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2121-:d:1385709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.