IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v11y2019i1p151-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should Investors on Equity Markets Be Superstitious? (Example of 7 World Stock Indexes Components)

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Borowski

Abstract

The problem of efficiency of financial markets, especially the weekend effect has always fascinated scholars and practitioners due to its relationship with the financial market efficiency. The issue is significant from the point of view of assessing the portfolio management effectiveness and behavioral finance. This paper tests the hypothesis of the unfortunate dates effect upon 7 equity indexes components (CAC40, DAX, DJIA, FTSE30, FTSE MIBTEL, NIKKEI225 and SENSEX), i.e. 419 companies. For all these equities the following rates of return were analyzed- Close-close, Overnight, Open-open, Open-close. As unfortunate days, the sessions falling on the following dates were selected- 13th and 4th day of the month, Friday the 13th and Tuesday the 13th. The research proved the presence of all kinds of the ;unfortunate dates; effects on analyzed markets. The effects were registered for all analyzed rates of return. The most dominating “unfortunate dates effects” resulted to be Tuesday the 13th, proceeding the 4th day of the month effect. This is the first analysis of the presence of the ;unfortunate dates effect, in which other than Close-close returns were examined and fulfils the research gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Borowski, 2019. "Should Investors on Equity Markets Be Superstitious? (Example of 7 World Stock Indexes Components)," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 151-174, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:151-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/38007/38519
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/38007
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ng, Travis & Chong, Terence & Du, Xin, 2010. "The value of superstitions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 293-309, June.
    2. Schwert, G. William, 2003. "Anomalies and market efficiency," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 15, pages 939-974, Elsevier.
    3. András Vargha & Harold D. Delaney, 1998. "The Kruskal-Wallis Test and Stochastic Homogeneity," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 23(2), pages 170-192, June.
    4. Richard Chung & Ali F. Darrat & Bin Li, 2014. "Superstitions and stock trading: some new evidence," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 527-538, October.
    5. Utpal Bhattacharya & Wei-Yu Kuo & Tse-Chun Lin & Jing Zhao, 2018. "Do Superstitious Traders Lose Money?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(8), pages 3772-3791, August.
    6. Agrawal, Anup & Tandon, Kishore, 1994. "Anomalies or illusions? Evidence from stock markets in eighteen countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 83-106, February.
    7. J. Andrew Coutts, 1999. "Friday the thirteenth and the Financial Times Industrial Ordinary Shares Index 1935-94," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 35-37.
    8. Barone, E., 1990. "The italian stock market : Efficiency and calendar anomalies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 14(2-3), pages 483-510, August.
    9. Auer, Benjamin R. & Rottmann, Horst, 2014. "Is there a Friday the 13th effect in emerging Asian stock markets?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 1(C), pages 17-26.
    10. Brown, Philip & Mitchell, Jason, 2008. "Culture and stock price clustering: Evidence from The Peoples' Republic of China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 95-120, January.
    11. Kolb, Robert W & Rodriguez, Ricardo J, 1987. "Friday the Thirteenth: 'Part VII'--A Note," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 42(5), pages 1385-1387, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cui, Yueting & Gavriilidis, Konstantinos & Gebka, Bartosz & Kallinterakis, Vasileios, 2024. "Numerological superstitions and market-wide herding: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Plastun, Alex & Sibande, Xolani & Gupta, Rangan & Wohar, Mark E., 2019. "Rise and fall of calendar anomalies over a century," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 181-205.
    2. Bogdan Batrinca & Christian W. Hesse & Philip C. Treleaven, 2020. "Expiration day effects on European trading volumes," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 1603-1638, April.
    3. Glenn Boyle & Andrew Hagan & R. Seini O'Connor & Nick Whitwell, 2004. "Emotion, fear and superstition in the New Zealand stockmarket," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 65-85.
    4. Auer, Benjamin R. & Rottmann, Horst, 2014. "Is there a Friday the 13th effect in emerging Asian stock markets?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 1(C), pages 17-26.
    5. Bogdan Batrinca & Christian W. Hesse & Philip C. Treleaven, 2018. "European trading volumes on cross‐market holidays," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4), pages 675-704, October.
    6. repec:vuw:vuwscr:18969 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Krzysztof Borowski, 2015. "Analysis of the Weekend Effect on the Markets of 121 Equity Indices and 29 Commodities," Eurasian Journal of Business and Management, Eurasian Publications, vol. 3(4), pages 23-35.
    8. Bai, Min & Xu, Limin & Yu, Chia-Feng (Jeffrey) & Zurbruegg, Ralf, 2020. "Superstition and stock price crash risk," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Brian Lucey, 2001. "Friday the 13th: international evidence," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(9), pages 577-579.
    10. Boyle, Glenn & Hagan, Andrew & O'Connor, R. Seini, 2004. "Emotion, Fear and Superstition in the New Zealand Stockmarket," Working Paper Series 18969, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    11. Tariq Aziz & Valeed Ahmad Ansari, 2018. "The Turn of the Month Effect in Asia-Pacific Markets: New Evidence," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(1), pages 214-226, February.
    12. Vasileiou, Evangelos, 2018. "Is the turn of the month effect an “abnormal normality”? Controversial findings, new patterns and…hidden signs(?)," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 153-175.
    13. Charles, Amélie, 2010. "The day-of-the-week effects on the volatility: The role of the asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 143-152, April.
    14. Brian Lucey, 2005. "Are local or international influences responsible for the pre-holiday behaviour of Irish equities?," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 381-389.
    15. Keef, Stephen P & Khaled, Mohammed S, 2011. "The friday the thirteenth effect in stock prices: international evidence using panel data," Working Paper Series 18607, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    16. David Hirshleifer & Ming Jian & Huai Zhang, 2018. "Superstition and Financial Decision Making," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 235-252, January.
    17. Doyle, John R. & Chen, Catherine Huirong, 2012. "A multidimensional classification of market anomalies: Evidence from 76 price indices," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 1237-1257.
    18. Roger, Patrick & D’Hondt, Catherine & Plotkina, Daria & Hoffmann, Arvid, 2022. "Number 19: Another Victim of the COVID‐19 Pandemic?," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2022007, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    19. Stefanescu Razvan & Dumitriu Ramona, 2021. "The Extended Holiday Effects on Bucharest Stock Exchange during Coronavirus Pandemic," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 293-303.
    20. Kamel Malik BENSAFTA, 2014. "A Regional Analysis of Markets Uncertainty Spillover," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2243, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    21. Guglielmo Maria Caporale & Luis A. Gil-Alana & Alex Plastun & Inna Makarenko, 2014. "The Weekend Effect: A Trading Robot and Fractional Integration Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 4849, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    market efficiency; calendar anomalies; Friday the 13th; Tuesday the 13th; unfortunate dates effect;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:151-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.