IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v11y2016i8p152.html

Exploring the Leadership Preference of Malaysian Generation Y Employees: A Conceptual Paper

Author

Listed:
  • Sharizan Sharkawi
  • Syed Syed Mohamad
  • Rosmimah Roslin

Abstract

Generation Y, individuals age 34 years and below are dominating the workforce in Malaysia today with nearly half of the labour force comprised of this generational cohort. They will be playing a vital role in the Malaysian labour market and will have unprecedented impact to the country’s future economic growth. However, a dilemma confronting leaders today is the limited understanding when leading the Gen Y. This paper is not empirically based but merely conceptual in nature. It is aimed at presenting the preliminary work for a study. The concepts of leadership and the many theories that have evolved are examined. Review of past literature concerning the Gen Y and their leaders are deliberated. From the literature review, many missing parameters were discovered. Firstly, studies in Gen Y mostly covers motivation, values, behaviours, job satisfaction and organisational commitment but not on leadership preferences per se. In addition to that many of the studies conducted are in the Western perspectives and to accept the results entirely will be an over-generalisation. Lastly, the field of leadership is continuously evolving inspired by the current wants and needs. Thus this brings light to the intention of this study which is to explore the leadership preferences of Gen Y employees specifically looking at the local context. The conceptual framework proposed as the foundation of this study consists of the different leadership theories from early days of trait theory to the more contemporary transformational leadership theory. This conceptual framework will guide in the data collection process whereby a basic qualitative method is proposed as the most suitable approach for this study. It will be based on the interpretive or constructivist perspective where multiple realities and lived experiences of Gen Y concerning their leadership preferences will be uncovered through in depth interviews with the participants involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharizan Sharkawi & Syed Syed Mohamad & Rosmimah Roslin, 2016. "Exploring the Leadership Preference of Malaysian Generation Y Employees: A Conceptual Paper," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 152-152, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:11:y:2016:i:8:p:152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/59329/33008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/59329
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn P. Egri & David A. Ralston, 2004. "Generation Cohorts and Personal Values: A Comparison of China and the United States," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 210-220, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nur Hidayah Hud & Ahmad Fadhly Arham & Zulkefli Muhamad Hanapiyah, 2024. "Successful Leadership Styles from the Lense of Qualitative Perspective: A Conceptual Visit," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 116-123.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanki Hartijasti, 2017. "Is Financial Reward Still an Important Motivator for the Indonesian Multi-Generational Workforce?," GATR Journals jmmr144, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    2. Louise C Hawkley & Yuanyuan Gu & Yue-Jia Luo & John T Cacioppo, 2012. "The Mental Representation of Social Connections: Generalizability Extended to Beijing Adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing & Zhang, Mao, 2021. "Tournament incentives, age diversity and firm performance," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 139-162.
    4. Chao Chen & Xiao-Ping Chen, 2009. "Negative externalities of close guanxi within organizations," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 37-53, March.
    5. Lei Wang & Heikki Juslin, 2011. "The effects of value on the perception of corporate social responsibility implementation: A study of Chinese youth," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 246-262, July.
    6. Hsu, Cathy H.C. & Huang, Songshan (Sam), 2016. "Reconfiguring Chinese cultural values and their tourism implications," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 230-242.
    7. Jianfang Liang & Jingjun Li & Xuerong Cao & Zejun Zhang, 2024. "Generational Differences in Sustainable Consumption Behavior among Chinese Residents: Implications Based on Perceptions of Sustainable Consumption and Lifestyle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Li Yan & Hean Tat Keh & Kyle B. Murray, 2024. "Feeling the values: How pride and awe differentially enhance consumers’ sustainable behavioral intentions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 75-96, January.
    9. Hao, Ying & Li, Junyi & Cui, Xuegang & Ni, Juan, 2023. "CEO experience, managerial overconfidence and investment efficiency: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Dongyu Chen & Xiaolin Li & Fujun Lai, 2023. "Shill bidding in lenders’ eyes? A cross-country study on the influence of large bids in online P2P lending," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1089-1114, June.
    11. Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing & Zhang, Mao, 2016. "Managing the diversity: board age diversity, directors’ personal values, and bank performance," MPRA Paper 71927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Lissitsa, Sabina & Kol, Ofrit, 2016. "Generation X vs. Generation Y – A decade of online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 304-312.
    13. Yuehua Xu & Vishal K. Gupta & Shan Xue & Sandra Mortal & Honghui Chen, 2025. "Female Management Representation and Corporate Financial Fraud: Do Local Gender Norms Play a Role?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 202(4), pages 781-802, December.
    14. Maximiano Ortiz-Pimentel & Carlos Molina & Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2020. "Bibliometric assessment of papers on generations in management and business journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 445-469, October.
    15. van Hoorn, A.A.J., 2013. "Generational shifts in managerial values and the coming of a global business culture," Research Report 13012-GEM, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    16. Fabian Froese, 2013. "Work values of the next generation of business leaders in Shanghai, Tokyo, and Seoul," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 297-315, March.
    17. He Li & Yujin Han & Yunyu Xiao & Xingyun Liu & Ang Li & Tingshao Zhu, 2021. "Suicidal Ideation Risk and Socio-Cultural Factors in China: A Longitudinal Study on Social Media from 2010 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    18. André Hoorn, 2019. "Generational Shifts in Managerial Values and the Coming of a Unified Business Culture: A Cross-National Analysis Using European Social Survey Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 547-566, March.
    19. Sait Gurbuz & Ihsan Aytekin, 2020. "PAre Work Attitudes of Generations Myth or Real? Evidence from the United States and Turkey," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 49(2), pages 248-270, November.
    20. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Yufei Ren, 2014. "Trust, Trustworthiness, and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Bridging China and the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2435-2460, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:11:y:2016:i:8:p:152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.