IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3962-d1644546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moderated Mediation Analysis of the Relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Innovation Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Jialin Liu

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

  • Xinyu Liu

    (Economic Department, University of Florence, 50121 Florence, Italy)

  • Hongbo Gao

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

Abstract

The spread of the pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges for Chinese enterprises, particularly in the new energy sector, where numerous companies have been forced to halt their development plans and suspend projects, awaiting opportunities to restart. In this context, enterprise performance is significantly affected, making employee innovation a critical factor in business survival and growth amid adversity. This study explored the intrinsic link between inclusive leadership styles and employees’ innovative behaviors, with a particular focus on introspection and sense of accomplishment as key psychological mechanisms that drive innovation. Through mediation analysis, this study investigated how inclusive leadership could foster employees’ innovative behaviors by influencing their introspection and sense of achievement. This study incorporated psychological safety and organizational support as moderating variables in its research methodology. Psychological safety refers to the extent to which employees can feel accepted and respected within an organization, whereas organizational support encompasses the assistance and resources provided by the organization. This study employed a detailed questionnaire to assess employees’ perceptions of inclusive leadership, introspection, innovation behavior, psychological safety, and organizational support in energy companies. Following data collection, IBM statistic SPSS 27 software was used for correlation, regression, and moderated mediation analyses. This article concludes that leaders should not only focus on performance, but also on the psychological development of employees, such as their sense of achievement and introspection.

Suggested Citation

  • Jialin Liu & Xinyu Liu & Hongbo Gao, 2025. "Moderated Mediation Analysis of the Relationship Between Inclusive Leadership and Innovation Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3962-:d:1644546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berry, Leonard L. & Seiders, Kathleen, 2008. "Serving unfair customers," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 29-37.
    2. Enno Siemsen & Aleda V. Roth & Sridhar Balasubramanian & Gopesh Anand, 2009. "The Influence of Psychological Safety and Confidence in Knowledge on Employee Knowledge Sharing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 429-447, April.
    3. Jing Tian & Mohan Zhang & Haitao Zhou & Jianfen Wu, 2021. "College Satisfaction, Sense of Achievement, Student Happiness and Sense of Belonging of Freshmen in Chinese Private Colleges: Mediation Effect of Emotion Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knoppen, Desirée & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2017. "Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 15-25.
    2. Guiyang Zhang, 2021. "Employee co-invention network dynamics and firm exploratory innovation: the moderation of employee co-invention network centralization and knowledge-employee network equilibrium," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7811-7836, September.
    3. Reynolds, Kate L. & Harris, Lloyd C., 2009. "Dysfunctional Customer Behavior Severity: An Empirical Examination," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 321-335.
    4. Daunt, Kate L. & Harris, Lloyd C., 2011. "Customers acting badly: Evidence from the hospitality industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(10), pages 1034-1042, October.
    5. Khantimirov, Denis & Karande, Kiran, 2018. "Complaint as a persuasion attempt: Front line employees’ perceptions of complaint legitimacy," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 68-76.
    6. Tine Bock & Iris Vermeir & Patrick Kenhove, 2013. "“What’s the Harm in Being Unethical? These Strangers are Rich Anyway!” Exploring Underlying Factors of Double Standards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 225-240, January.
    7. Yuxi Tang & Weiguang He, 2022. "Emotion Regulation and Psychological Capital of Chinese University Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Serial Mediation Effect of Learning Satisfaction and Learning Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Chenghao Men & Patrick S. W. Fong & Weiwei Huo & Jing Zhong & Ruiqian Jia & Jinlian Luo, 2020. "Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Hiding: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Safety and Mastery Climate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 461-472, October.
    9. Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2011. "Fluid Tasks and Fluid Teams: The Impact of Diversity in Experience and Team Familiarity on Team Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 310-328, July.
    10. Sinan He & Dingkai Chen & Xiaoqi Shang & Linwei Han & Longyu Shi, 2022. "Resident Satisfaction of Urban Green Spaces through the Lens of Landsenses Ecology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn (Nui) & Grace, Debra & Ross, Mitchell, 2021. "Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 631-640.
    12. Katherine Bobroske & Michael Freeman & Lawrence Huan & Anita Cattrell & Stefan Scholtes, 2022. "Curbing the Opioid Epidemic at Its Root: The Effect of Provider Discordance After Opioid Initiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2003-2015, March.
    13. Liu, Yuwen & Phillips, James S., 2011. "Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 44-52.
    14. Lea Ruesch & Murat Tarakci & Maria Besiou & Niels Van Quaquebeke, 2022. "Orchestrating coordination among humanitarian organizations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1977-1996, May.
    15. Emil Viduranga Mogård & Ole Bendik Rørstad & Henning Bang, 2022. "The Relationship between Psychological Safety and Management Team Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Behavioral Integration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, December.
    16. Tilko Swalve, 2022. "Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 223-249, March.
    17. Ji Wu & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & J. Leon Zhao, 2021. "FairPlay: Detecting and Deterring Online Customer Misbehavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1323-1346, December.
    18. Karen Donohue & Özalp Özer, 2020. "Behavioral Operations: Past, Present, and Future," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 191-202, January.
    19. Nguyen, Stephanie & Nicod, Lionel & Llosa, Sylvie, 2024. "Preventing bypass on sharing economy platforms: The impact of message framing on users’ bypass intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Andrea Furlan & Ambra Galeazzo & Adriano Paggiaro, 2019. "Organizational and Perceived Learning in the Workplace: A Multilevel Perspective on Employees’ Problem Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 280-297, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3962-:d:1644546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.