IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3813-d1640845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking Efficiency, Sustainability, and Corporate Responsibility in Maritime Logistics: An Entropy-GRA Model with Sensitivity Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Nan Wang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan)

  • Bach Xuan Quang

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan
    Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Hong Bang International University, Ho Chi Minh 72320, Vietnam)

  • Thi Thanh Tam Nguyen

    (Department of Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Hong Bang International University, Ho Chi Minh 72320, Vietnam)

Abstract

As global awareness of sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR) intensifies, container shipping lines (CSLs) face growing pressure to align their operations with stakeholder expectations. However, existing studies in maritime logistics often examine CSR and environmental performance separately, rely on qualitative methods, or focus on broader shipping contexts without targeting CSLs specifically. Moreover, few studies provide data-driven benchmarking tools to evaluate performance across multiple sustainability dimensions. This study addresses these gaps by developing a quantitative benchmarking model that integrates entropy weighting and the grey relational analysis (GRA) to assess the performance of ten major CSLs using real-world data from 2022. The model incorporates operational, environmental, and social indicators, with entropy weighting objectively capturing the relative importance of each criterion. The GRA method is applied to rank CSLs based on their closeness to an ideal performer. A sensitivity analysis is then conducted by varying the distinguishing coefficient to test the robustness of the results. The findings reveal that cost-related criteria, such as the number of employees, energy consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions, carry the most weight. CSLs that perform consistently across multiple indicators tend to outperform peers that show inconsistency or rely heavily on a narrow set of strengths. This study contributes to the literature by offering an integrated, replicable approach for efficiency, sustainability, and CSR performance benchmarking in maritime logistics and by providing practical insights for policymakers, industry managers, and researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Nan Wang & Bach Xuan Quang & Thi Thanh Tam Nguyen, 2025. "Benchmarking Efficiency, Sustainability, and Corporate Responsibility in Maritime Logistics: An Entropy-GRA Model with Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3813-:d:1640845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3813/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3813/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleni N. Giannakopoulou & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos & Theodoros V. Stamatopoulos, 2016. "Corporate governance in shipping: an overview," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 19-38, January.
    2. Yuen, Kum Fai & Thai, Vinh V. & Wong, Yiik Diew & Wang, Xueqin, 2018. "Interaction impacts of corporate social responsibility and service quality on shipping firms’ performance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 397-409.
    3. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Li, Kevin X. & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Shipping industry's sustainability communications to public in social media: A longitudinal analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 123-134.
    4. Hee-Seok Bang & Hyo-Won Kang & Jeffrey Martin & Su-Han Woo, 2012. "The impact of operational and strategic management on liner shipping efficiency: a two-stage DEA approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7), pages 653-672, December.
    5. Kevin Campbell & Antonio Mínguez-Vera, 2008. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 435-451, December.
    6. Assunta Di Vaio & Anum Zaffar & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Antonio Garofalo, 2023. "Decarbonization technology responsibility to gender equality in the shipping industry: a systematic literature review and new avenues ahead," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Oh Kyoung Kwon & Xiao Ruan, 2019. "Sustainability Challenges in Maritime Transport and Logistics Industry and Its Way Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Amirmahdi Malek & Sadoullah Ebrahimnejad & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2017. "An Improved Hybrid Grey Relational Analysis Approach for Green Resilient Supply Chain Network Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, August.
    9. Dariusz Bernacki, 2021. "Assessing the Link between Vessel Size and Maritime Supply Chain Sustainable Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Lijun Tang & Victor Gekara, 2020. "The Importance of Customer Expectations: An Analysis of CSR in Container Shipping," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 383-393, September.
    11. Taih-Cherng Lirn & Hsiao-Wen Lin & Kuo-Chung Shang, 2014. "Green shipping management capability and firm performance in the container shipping industry," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 159-175, March.
    12. Zhou, Yusheng & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Sustainability disclosure for container shipping: A text-mining approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 465-477.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arthur J. Lin & Hai-Yen Chang & Brian Hung, 2022. "Identifying Key Financial, Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG), Bond, and COVID-19 Factors Affecting Global Shipping Companies—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Xue, Yuemei & Lai, Kee-hung, 2023. "Responsible shipping for sustainable development: Adoption and performance value," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 89-99.
    3. Zhou, Yusheng & Li, Xue & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Li, Kevin X., 2020. "The role of stakeholder participation and sustainability integration in maritime transport: A structure-conduct-performance analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 44-53.
    5. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2015. "Designing a sustainable maritime supply chain: A hybrid QFD–ANP approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 70-81.
    6. Zhou, Yusheng & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Sustainability disclosure for container shipping: A text-mining approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 465-477.
    7. Peng, Wenhao & Bai, Xiwen, 2022. "Prospects for improving shipping companies’ profit margins by quantifying operational strategies and market focus approach through AIS data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 138-152.
    8. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Ma, Fei, 2019. "A contingency view of the effects of sustainable shipping exploitation and exploration on business performance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 90-103.
    9. De Luca, Francesco & Iaia, Lea & Mehmood, Asad & Vrontis, Demetris, 2022. "Can social media improve stakeholder engagement and communication of Sustainable Development Goals? A cross-country analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    10. Li, Xue & Zhou, Yusheng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "A systematic review on seafarer health: Conditions, antecedents and interventions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 11-25.
    11. H. Pierre Hsieh & Kuo‐Cheng Kuo & Minh‐Hieu Le & Wen‐Min Lu, 2021. "Exploring the cargo and eco‐efficiencies of international container shipping companies: A network‐based ranking approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 45-60, January.
    12. Yuen, Kum Fai & Li, Kevin X. & Xu, Gangyan & Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2019. "A taxonomy of resources for sustainable shipping management: Their interrelationships and effects on business performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 316-332.
    13. Natalia Wagner & Bogusz Wiśnicki, 2022. "The Importance of Emerging Technologies to the Increasing of Corporate Sustainability in Shipping Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Arnold Pabian & Barbara Pabian, 2023. "Role of Social Media in Managing Knowledge of the Young Generation in the Sustainability Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Boubaker, Sabri & Brinette, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2021. "Board feminization and innovation through corporate venture capital investments: The moderating effects of independence and management skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Leal Silva, Jean Felipe & Nogueira, Luiz Augusto Horta & Cantarella, Heitor & Rossetto, Raffaella & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Souza, Glaucia Mendes, 2025. "Meta-data analysis of biofuels in emerging markets of Africa and Asia: Greenhouse gas savings and economic feasibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Xingwen Chen & Li Zhu & Chao Liu & Chunhua Chen & Jun Liu & Dongxia Huo, 2023. "Workplace Diversity in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1021-1045, September.
    18. Owen, Ann L. & Temesvary, Judit, 2018. "The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 50-63.
    19. Fabio De Matteis & Alessandra Tafuro & Fabrizio Striani & Daniela Preite, 2023. "Totally Publicly-Owned (TPO) Utilities and Financial Performance: What is the role of some aspects of governance?," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 89-111.
    20. Won-Kyu Lim & Cheong-Kyu Park, 2022. "Mandating Gender Diversity and the Value Relevance of Sustainable Development Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3813-:d:1640845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.