IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3628-d1636705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Governance of Digital Platform Ecosystem: A Life Cycle Perspective Through Multiple Governance Parties

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Han

    (School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)

  • Lei Xie

    (School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

Abstract

Today, the digital economy has pursued the required social and economic development, and enterprises can achieve green transition and long-term sustainability by relying on the digital platform ecosystem. However, the development of the digital economy and the rapid growth of platform governance have also generated some problems. This study’s purpose was to explore the issue of green governance of the digital platform ecosystem and to find effective methods of such governance under different life cycle stages based on multiple parties. This study used the tripartite evolutionary game method and analyzed the changes and effects of platform green governance under different development stages from the perspectives of government, platforms, and enterprises. The results indicate that in the early stages, digital platforms primarily relied on the government’s obligation to regulate. With the digital platform ecosystem’s evolution, the platform organization green governance and settled enterprises’ green transition effects gradually appeared, establishing the three common constraints of governance mode. Finally, when the digital platform ecosystem is in its self-renewal period, the government effect is reduced, with the platform itself and settled enterprises taking primary roles. The goal of this study is to enrich the theoretical basis of platform green governance and enlighten the management of different governance subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Han & Lei Xie, 2025. "Sustainable Governance of Digital Platform Ecosystem: A Life Cycle Perspective Through Multiple Governance Parties," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3628-:d:1636705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3628-:d:1636705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.