IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3406-d1632707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accelerating Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Clean Energy Transitions: An Algebraic Model for Achieving Net-Zero Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Elaheh Shobeiri

    (Department of Energy and Nuclear Engineering, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada)

  • Filippo Genco

    (Department of Energy and Nuclear Engineering, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada)

  • Daniel Hoornweg

    (Department of Energy and Nuclear Engineering, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada)

  • Akira Tokuhiro

    (Department of Energy and Nuclear Engineering, Ontario Tech University, 2000 Simcoe Street North, Oshawa, ON L1G 0C5, Canada)

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent need for transitioning to clean energy systems to achieve net-zero emissions and mitigate climate change. It introduces an algebraic modeling framework inspired by the nuclear fission six-factor formula to optimize the construction rates of clean power plants, with a focus on Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). The framework integrates four key factors affecting SMR deployment: Public Acceptance (PA), Supply Chain Readiness (SC), Human Resource (HR) Availability, and Land Availability (LA), including their associated sub-factors. The proposed algebraic formula optimizes projections from the existing Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy (DICE) model. By capturing socio-economic and environmental constraints, the model enhances the accuracy of clean energy transition scenarios. In the case of Ontario’s pathway to achieving net-zero emissions, the results indicate that incorporating the algebraic formula reduces the SMR construction rate projected by the DICE model from 5.2 to 3.7 units per year by 2050 and from 2.7 to 1.9 units per year by 2100. This reduction highlights the need for accelerated readiness in key deployment factors to avoid delays in reaching net zero targets, reinforcing the importance of strategic investments in PA, SC, HR, and LA. Validation against historical nuclear deployment data from the U.S., Japan, and Canada confirms the model’s ability to reflect real-world trends, with PA and SC emerging as the most influential factors. In addition to informing SMR planning, this approach offers a structured tool for prioritizing policy actions and can be adapted to other clean technologies, enhancing strategic decision making in support of net-zero goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2025. "Accelerating Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Clean Energy Transitions: An Algebraic Model for Achieving Net-Zero Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3406-:d:1632707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentina Bosetti & Carlo Carraro & Marzio Galeotti & Emanuele Massetti & Massimo Tavoni, 2006. "WITCH. A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model," Working Papers 2006_46, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    2. Nordhaus, William D & Yang, Zili, 1996. "A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 741-765, September.
    3. Kim, Younghwan & Kim, Minki & Kim, Wonjoon, 2013. "Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 822-828.
    4. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexander Tsipoulanidis & Jörn Schönberger, 2017. "Erratum to: Global Supply Chain and Operations Management," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Global Supply Chain and Operations Management, pages E1-E1, Springer.
    5. Verica Radisavljevic-Gajic & Dimitri Karagiannis & Zoran Gajic, 2023. "The Modeling and Control of (Renewable) Energy Systems by Partial Differential Equations—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Mihalis Giannakis & Michalis Louis, 2016. "A Multi-Agent Based System with Big Data Processing for Enhanced Supply Chain Agility," Post-Print hal-01353916, HAL.
    7. Dmitry Ivanov & Alexander Tsipoulanidis & Jörn Schönberger, 2017. "Global Supply Chain and Operations Management," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-24217-0, March.
    8. Nair, Purusothmn Nair S. Bhasker & Tan, Raymond R. & Foo, Dominic C.Y., 2021. "A generic algebraic targeting approach for integration of renewable energy sources, CO2 capture and storage and negative emission technologies in carbon-constrained energy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Katherine Calvin & Marshall Wise & Leon Clarke & Jae Edmonds & Page Kyle & Patrick Luckow & Allison Thomson, 2013. "Implications of simultaneously mitigating and adapting to climate change: initial experiments using GCAM," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 545-560, April.
    10. Elaheh Shobeiri & Filippo Genco & Daniel Hoornweg & Akira Tokuhiro, 2023. "Small Modular Reactor Deployment and Obstacles to Be Overcome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Hayashi, Masatsugu & Hughes, Larry, 2013. "The Fukushima nuclear accident and its effect on global energy security," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 102-111.
    12. Anastasia Ioannou & Gioia Falcone & Christina Baisch & Georgie Friederichs & Jan Hildebrand, 2023. "A Decision Support Tool for Social Engagement, Alternative Financing and Risk Mitigation of Geothermal Energy Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lam, J. & Cheung, L. & Han, Y. & Wang, S., 2018. "China’s Response to Nuclear Safety Post-Fukushima: Genuine or Rhetoric?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1866, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Leurent, Martin & Jasserand, Frédéric & Locatelli, Giorgio & Palm, Jenny & Rämä, Miika & Trianni, Andrea, 2017. "Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: Lessons learnt from Finland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 138-150.
    3. Rogna, Marco & Vogt, Carla J., 2021. "Accounting for inequality aversion can justify the 2° C goal," Ruhr Economic Papers 925, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Alice Favero & Robert Mendelsohn, 2013. "Evaluating the Global Role of Woody Biomass as a Mitigation Strategy," Working Papers 2013.37, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    5. Koji Tokimatsu & Louis Dupuy & Nick Hanley, 2019. "Using Genuine Savings for Climate Policy Evaluation with an Integrated Assessment Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(1), pages 281-307, January.
    6. Fabien Prieur & Ingmar Schumacher, 2022. "The impact of conflicts on climate and migration policy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(4), pages 653-681, August.
    7. Bosetti, Valentina & Carraro, Carlo & De Cian, Enrica & Massetti, Emanuele & Tavoni, Massimo, 2013. "Incentives and stability of international climate coalitions: An integrated assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 44-56.
    8. Kai LESSMANN & Robert MARSCHINSKI & Ottmar EDENHOFER, 2008. "The Effects of Trade Sanctions in International Environmental Agreements," EcoMod2008 23800079, EcoMod.
    9. Carraro, Carlo & Favero, Alice & Massetti, Emanuele, 2012. "“Investments and public finance in a green, low carbon, economy”," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(S1), pages 15-28.
    10. BRECHET, Thierry & THENIE, Julien & ZEIMES, Thibaut & ZUBER, Stéphane, 2010. "The benefits of cooperation under uncertainty: the case of climate change," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2010062, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Valentina Bosetti & Frédéric Ghersi, 2012. "Beyond GDP: Modelling Labour Supply as a 'Free Time' Trade-Off in a Multiregional Optimal Growth Model," Post-Print hal-00797233, HAL.
    12. Carlo Carraro & Enrica De Cian & Lea Nicita, 2009. "Modeling Biased Technical Change. Implications For Climate Policy," Working Papers 2009_27, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    13. Marco Rogna & Carla J. Vogt, 2022. "Optimal climate policies under fairness preferences," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Ingmar Schumacher, 2018. "The Aggregation Dilemma In Climate Change Policy Evaluation," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Naqvi, Asjad & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2018. "Directed Technological Change in a Post-Keynesian Ecological Macromodel," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 168-188.
    16. Duan, Hong-Bo & Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2014. "Optimal carbon taxes in carbon-constrained China: A logistic-induced energy economic hybrid model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 345-356.
    17. Yilmazkuday, Hakan, 2022. "Coronavirus disease 2019 and the global economy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 40-46.
    18. Carraro, Carlo & Massetti, Emanuele, 2012. "Energy and climate change in China," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 689-713, December.
    19. Ciola, Emanuele & Turco, Enrico & Gurgone, Andrea & Bazzana, Davide & Vergalli, Sergio & Menoncin, Francesco, 2023. "Enter the MATRIX model:a Multi-Agent model for Transition Risks with application to energy shocks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. Kosai, Shoki & Yamasue, Eiji, 2019. "Recommendation to ASEAN nuclear development based on lessons learnt from the Fukushima nuclear accident," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 628-635.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3406-:d:1632707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.