IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3385-d1632166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Dynamic Impact of Digital Financial Literacy on Rural Household Income: New Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yue Yu

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Wenjing Li

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Huarong Li

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Shuming Luo

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

  • Yan Liu

    (College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China)

Abstract

Digital financial literacy, as an upgrade of financial literacy in the digital age, has a non-negligible impact on the income of farm households and the sustainable development of the rural economy. This study aims to investigate the impact of digital financial literacy on rural household income in China and its mechanism of action. Using the sample of rural households in the 2019 China Household Finance Survey (CHFS), which ultimately collected information on 34,643 households and 107,008 household members, the principal component analysis method was used to analyze scores to measure the digital financial literacy level of rural households at three levels—financial knowledge, financial skill application, and digital skills and digital product use—and to perform mechanism analysis and heterogeneity analysis with inclusive finance data from the Digital Finance Research Center of Peking University. The research ideas in this paper are as follows: firstly, to clarify the metric index system of digital financial literacy and calculate to obtain the digital financial literacy score of farmers; secondly, to analyze the direct relationship between digital financial literacy and farmers’ household income; thirdly, to explore the intermediary role of social capital in the process of digital financial literacy affecting farmers’ income; and lastly, to examine the moderating effect of the level of regional financial development. The findings of this study show that digital financial literacy has a significant income-increasing effect on rural residents; mechanism analysis reveals that digital financial literacy increases farmers’ income by increasing social capital, and the level of regional financial development mediates the impact of digital financial literacy on rural household income. From a macro perspective, this article explains the necessity of improving rural households’ digital financial literacy to deepen rural financial services as well as to promote sustainable rural economic development. From a micro perspective, improving rural households’ digital financial literacy and digital financial infrastructure will help optimize their household income levels and income structure. This study provides empirical evidence and decision-making references for increasing farmers’ income, broadening income channels, and improving farmers’ digital human capital to achieve “rural revitalization” in the new era.

Suggested Citation

  • Yue Yu & Wenjing Li & Huarong Li & Shuming Luo & Yan Liu, 2025. "Exploring the Dynamic Impact of Digital Financial Literacy on Rural Household Income: New Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3385-:d:1632166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pawan Ashok Kamble & Atul Mehta & Neelam Rani, 2024. "Financial Inclusion and Digital Financial Literacy: Do they Matter for Financial Well-being?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 777-807, February.
    2. Brian C. Briggeman & Allan W. Gray & Mitchell J. Morehart & Timothy G. Baker & Christine A. Wilson, 2007. "A New U.S. Farm Household Typology: Implications for Agricultural Policy," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 765-782.
    3. Zhang, Jian & Giles, John & Rozelle, Scott, 2012. "Does it pay to be a cadre? Estimating the returns to being a local official in rural China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 337-356.
    4. Yu, Fan & Xiao, De & Chang, Meng-Shiuh, 2021. "The impact of carbon emission trading schemes on urban-rural income inequality in China: A multi-period difference-in-differences method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Yanling Li & Mengxin Wang & Gaoke Liao & Junxia Wang, 2022. "Spatial Spillover Effect and Threshold Effect of Digital Financial Inclusion on Farmers’ Income Growth—Based on Provincial Data of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Nakano, Yuko & Magezi, Eustadius F., 2020. "The impact of microcredit on agricultural technology adoption and productivity: Evidence from randomized control trial in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Li, Xingguang & Liu, Jundi & Huo, Xuexi, 2021. "Impacts of tenure security and market-oriented allocation of farmland on agricultural productivity: Evidence from China’s apple growers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Kung, James Kai-sing, 2002. "Off-Farm Labor Markets and the Emergence of Land Rental Markets in Rural China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 395-414, June.
    9. Erik Mathijs & Nivelin Noev, 2004. "Subsistence Farming in Central and Eastern Europe : Empirical Evidence from Albania, Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 72-89, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenhai Xiang & Pengfei Ban & Qifeng Yuan, 2020. "Measurement of the Income Difference of Rural Residents in Peri-Urbanized Areas and Its Influencing Factors: Evidence from Nanhai, Foshan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Li, Xingguang & Huo, Xuexi, 2021. "Impacts of land market policies on formal credit accessibility and agricultural net income: Evidence from China's apple growers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Kun Song & Yu Tang & Dungang Zang & Hua Guo & Wenting Kong, 2022. "Does Digital Finance Increase Relatively Large-Scale Farmers’ Agricultural Income through the Allocation of Production Factors? Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    5. Wang, Xiaobing & Herzfeld, Thomas & Glauben, Thomas, 2007. "Labor allocation in transition: Evidence from Chinese rural households," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 287-308.
    6. Du, Zhi-Li & Kong, Wei & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2024. "Does local official stress hurt regional economic development? Survey evidence from Chinese grassroot cadres," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 978-989.
    7. Chloé Duvivier Duvivier & Mary-Françoise Renard & Shi Li, 2012. "Are workers close to cities paid higher non-agricultural wages in rural China?," CERDI Working papers halshs-00673698, HAL.
    8. Deng, Xin & Xu, Dingde & Zeng, Miao & Qi, Yanbin, 2019. "Does early-life famine experience impact rural land transfer? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 58-67.
    9. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    10. Caihua Xu & Qian Wang & Shah Fahad & Masaru Kagatsume & Jin Yu, 2022. "Impact of Off-Farm Employment on Farmland Transfer: Insight on the Mediating Role of Agricultural Production Service Outsourcing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Huiguang Chen & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Zhongyuan Liu, 2025. "Rural Migrant Workers in Urban China: Does Rural Land Still Matter?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Klaus Deininger & Daniel Ayalew Ali & Takashi Yamano, 2008. "Legal Knowledge and Economic Development: The Case of Land Rights in Uganda," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 593-619.
    13. Zou, Baoling & Mishra, Ashok K. & Luo, Biliang, 2018. "Aging population, farm succession, and farmland usage: Evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 437-445.
    14. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2007. "Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation : productivity and equity impacts in China," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4454, The World Bank.
    15. Tian, Guangjin & Duan, Jinlong & Yang, Lan, 2021. "Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanisms of cropland circulation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    16. Yang Guo & Meiling Cui & Zhigang Xu, 2023. "Effect of Spatial Characteristics of Farmland Plots on Transfer Patterns in China: A Supply and Demand Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Xiaoyu Sun & Weijing Zhu & Aili Chen & Gangqiao Yang, 2022. "Land Certificated Program and Farmland “Stickiness” of Rural Labor: Based on the Perspective of Land Production Function," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Derek G. Stacey, 2011. "Tenure Insecurity, Adverse Selection, And Liquidity In Rural Land Markets," Working Paper 1269, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    19. C. Duvivier & S. Li & M.-F. Renard, 2013. "Are workers close to cities paid higher nonagricultural wages in rural China?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(30), pages 4308-4322, October.
    20. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Zhang, Linxiu, 2021. "Plot Size, Adjacency, and Farmland Rental Contract Choice," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3385-:d:1632166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.