IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3264-d1629266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multidimensional Exploration of the Factors Influencing Comprehensive Grain Production Capacity from a Spatial Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijiao Liu

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China)

  • Shuo Hong

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
    These authors are co-second authors.)

  • Jingjing Wang

    (School of Economics and Business Administration, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
    These authors are co-second authors.)

Abstract

Improving comprehensive grain production capacity and ensuring food security is a critical step toward promoting national economic development and social stability. This study constructs an evaluation framework for comprehensive grain production capacity, examining five key dimensions: resource endowment, factor inputs, scientific and technological infrastructure, grain output, and sustainable development. The entropy method is employed to assess the national comprehensive grain production capacity. Subsequently, the study was performed based on the panel data from 31 provinces in China, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. This analysis was framed within the context of the Spatial Durbin Model and focused on four key aspects: the inputs of production factors, advancements in agricultural technology, national food policies, and the impact of natural disasters. The results indicate the following: (1) Grain production in the 31 provinces of the country demonstrates a significant positive correlation, with a clear space centralization effect. (2) The sown area of grain, labor inputs, fertilizer usage, and the advancement of the digital economy are the primary positive factors influencing regional grain production, but the disaster-affected area has a negative impact on grain production. As a result, this study makes policy recommendations to increase food security and sustainable agricultural development by increasing the sown area of grain, optimizing fertilizer use, and improving agricultural practice digitization. Special emphasis is being placed on reviving high-quality agricultural development by hastening the integration of the digital economy into agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijiao Liu & Shuo Hong & Jingjing Wang, 2025. "A Multidimensional Exploration of the Factors Influencing Comprehensive Grain Production Capacity from a Spatial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3264-:d:1629266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shenggen Fan, 2000. "Research Investment and the Economic Returns To Chinese Agricultural Research," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 163-182, September.
    2. Abbas Ali Chandio & Waqar Akram & Muhammad Usman & Yasir A. Nasereldin & Ilhan Ozturk, 2024. "Does fiscal expenditure matter for agricultural development? Examining the impact of technological progress on food production," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1774-1802, November.
    3. Rudolfsen, Ida & Bartusevičius, Henrikas & van Leeuwen, Florian & Østby, Gudrun, 2024. "War and food insecurity in Ukraine," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. Chen, Shuai & Chen, Xiaoguang & Xu, Jintao, 2016. "Impacts of climate change on agriculture: Evidence from China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 105-124.
    5. Fan, Shengyue & He, Miao & Zhang, Tianyu & Huo, Yajing & Fan, Di, 2022. "Credibility measurement as a tool for conserving nature: Chinese herders’ livelihood capitals and payment for grassland ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Gollin, Douglas, 2010. "Agricultural Productivity and Economic Growth," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: Robert Evenson & Prabhu Pingali (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 73, pages 3825-3866, Elsevier.
    7. Fan, Shenggan & Pardey, Philip G., 1997. "Research, productivity, and output growth in Chinese agriculture," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 115-137, June.
    8. Zhu, Jing, 2004. "Public investment and China's long-term food security under WTO," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 99-111, February.
    9. Ariel Ortiz-Bobea & Toby R. Ault & Carlos M. Carrillo & Robert G. Chambers & David B. Lobell, 2021. "Anthropogenic climate change has slowed global agricultural productivity growth," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(4), pages 306-312, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Shenggen & Fang, Cheng & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2001. "How Agricultural Research Affects Urban Poverty In Developing Countries? The Case Of China," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20636, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Zhu, Jing & Zhu, J., 2003. "Public Investment And China'S Grain Production Competitiveness Under Wto," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25825, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. He, Chaofei & Ho, Chun-Yu & Yu, Leng & Zhu, Xi, 2019. "Public investment and food security: Evidence from the Hundred Billion Plan in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 176-190.
    4. Zhen, Lin & Cao, Shuyan & Cheng, Shengkui & Xie, Gaodi & Wei, Yunjie & Liu, Xuelin & Li, Fen, 2010. "Arable land requirements based on food consumption patterns: Case study in rural Guyuan District, Western China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1443-1453, May.
    5. Fernando Aragon & Juan Pablo Rud, 2023. "Farm size and exposure to extreme heat: evidence from subsistence farms in Sub-Saharan Africa," Discussion Papers dp23-02, Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University.
    6. Chen, Po-Chi & Yu, Ming-Miin & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Hsun, 2008. "Total factor productivity growth in China's agricultural sector," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 580-593, December.
    7. Fan, Shenggen & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2004. "Infrastructure and regional economic development in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 203-214.
    8. Fan, Shenggen & Pratt, Alejandro Nin, 2010. "R&D investment in national and international agricultural research," IFPRI discussion papers 986, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Renkow, Mitch, 2010. "Impacts of IFPRI's "priorities for pro-poor public investment" global research program:," Impact assessments 31, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Fan, Shenggen & Fang, Cheng & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2003. "Agricultural Research and Urban Poverty: The Case of China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 733-741, April.
    11. Zhu, Jing, 2004. "Public investment and China's long-term food security under WTO," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 99-111, February.
    12. Tao Yang, Dennis, 2004. "Education and allocative efficiency: household income growth during rural reforms in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 137-162, June.
    13. Alexander C. Abajian & Tamma Carleton & Kyle C. Meng & Olivier Deschênes, 2025. "Quantifying the global climate feedback from energy-based adaptation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Chih-HAI YANG & Leah WU & Hui-Lin LIN, 2010. "Analysis of total-factor cultivated land efficiency in China's agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(5), pages 231-242.
    15. Maisonnave, Hélène & Mamboundou, Pierre Nziengui, 2022. "Agricultural economic reforms, gender inequality and poverty in Senegal," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 361-374.
    16. Federica Alfani & Vasco Molini & Giacomo Pallante & Alessandro PalmaGran, 2024. "Job displacement and reallocation failure. Evidence from climate shocks in Morocco," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 51(1), pages 1-31.
    17. Sayef Bakari, 2017. "The Impact of Vegetables Exports on Economic Growth in Tunisia," Economic Research Guardian, Mutascu Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 72-87, December.
    18. Frank H. Fuller & John C. Beghin & Stephane De Cara & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & Cheng Fang & Holger Matthey, 2001. "China's Accession to the WTO: What Is at Stake for Agricultural Markets?," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 01-wp276, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    19. Zhang, Yang & Zhang, Yan & Gao, Yan & McLaughlin, Neil B. & Huang, Dandan & Wang, Yang & Chen, Xuewen & Zhang, Shixiu & Liang, Aizhen, 2024. "Effects of tillage practices on environment, energy, and economy of maize production in Northeast China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Odusola, Ayodele, 2017. "Agriculture, Rural Poverty and Income Inequality in sub-Saharan Africa," UNDP Africa Economists Working Papers 266998, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3264-:d:1629266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.