IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3144-d1626485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Biogas Production Potential from Organic Waste and Livestock Byproducts in a Serbian Municipality: Implications for Sustainable Food Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Srećko Ćurčić

    (Faculty Technical Science in Čačak, University of Kragujevac, Svetog Save 65, 32102 Čačak, Serbia)

  • Dragan Milićević

    (Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Kaćanskog 13, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nataša Kilibarda

    (Department of Pharmacy, Singidunum University, Danijelova 32, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Aleksandar Peulić

    (Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Radoja Domanovica 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia
    Faculty of Geography, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 3/III, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

In the process of biogas production, various types of substrates with suitable energy potential are utilized to generate biogas in plants designed for cogeneration (CHP) of electricity and heat. This paper presents a literature review focused on different substrates involved in biogas production, emphasizing their optimization potential. Data for this research were gathered through a comprehensive review of scientific and scholarly literature from global databases. The study examines the biogas production capabilities of various feedstocks employed in cogeneration plants, highlighting the energy potential of substrates, including livestock byproducts such as liquid and solid manure, energy crops, organic waste from the food and slaughterhouse industries, as well as municipal wastewater and solid organic waste. Furthermore, we conducted a practical case study in the municipality of Čačak, which provides valuable insights into effective practices and strategies that can be broadly applied to enhance biogas production in similar contexts. The findings reveal significant variations in biogas production potential among different substrates, emphasizing the importance of strategic selection and management practices. This study contributes to the field by providing a clearer understanding of the substrate optimization process and practical insights that can inform the development of more effective biogas production strategies in local municipalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Srećko Ćurčić & Dragan Milićević & Nataša Kilibarda & Aleksandar Peulić, 2025. "Assessing Biogas Production Potential from Organic Waste and Livestock Byproducts in a Serbian Municipality: Implications for Sustainable Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3144-:d:1626485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Genovaitė Liobikienė & Astrida Miceikienė, 2023. "Contribution of the European Bioeconomy Strategy to the Green Deal Policy: Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing These Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Andreas Eder & Bernhard Mahlberg, 2018. "Size, Subsidies and Technical Efficiency in Renewable Energy Production: The Case of Austrian Biogas Plants," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    3. Olabi, A.G. & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Renewable energy and climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    4. Arkadiusz Piwowar & Maria Dzikuć, 2022. "Bioethanol Production in Poland in the Context of Sustainable Development-Current Status and Future Prospects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Kafle, Gopi Krishna & Kim, Sang Hun, 2013. "Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: Batch and continuous operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-72.
    6. Mihaela Simionescu & Carmen Beatrice Păuna & Tiberiu Diaconescu, 2020. "Renewable Energy and Economic Performance in the Context of the European Green Deal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Zhang, Jingxin & Li, Wangliang & Lee, Jonathan & Loh, Kai-Chee & Dai, Yanjun & Tong, Yen Wah, 2017. "Enhancement of biogas production in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge by biological co-pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 479-486.
    8. KeChrist Obileke & Nwabunwanne Nwokolo & Golden Makaka & Patrick Mukumba & Helen Onyeaka, 2021. "Anaerobic digestion: Technology for biogas production as a source of renewable energy—A review," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(2), pages 191-225, March.
    9. Anna Sobczak & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Monika Różycka & Jacek Stasiak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Andrzej Rostocki & Dorota Wieczorek & Paulina Pipiak & Katarzyna Ławińska, 2024. "Use of Biostimulants in Energy Crops as a New Approach for the Improvement of Performance Sequestration CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Janina Piekutin & Monika Puchlik & Michał Haczykowski & Katarzyna Dyczewska, 2021. "The Efficiency of the Biogas Plant Operation Depending on the Substrate Used," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, May.
    12. Josipa Pavičić & Karolina Novak Mavar & Vladislav Brkić & Katarina Simon, 2022. "Biogas and Biomethane Production and Usage: Technology Development, Advantages and Challenges in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Omid Norouzi & Animesh Dutta, 2022. "The Current Status and Future Potential of Biogas Production from Canada’s Organic Fraction Municipal Solid Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Jin, Yiying & Chen, Ting & Chen, Xin & Yu, Zhixin, 2015. "Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 227-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Huang & Junjie Zhong & Maner Xiao & Yuhui Zhu & Haojie Zheng & Bensheng Zheng, 2025. "Optimal and Sustainable Scheduling of Integrated Energy System Coupled with CCS-P2G and Waste-to-Energy Under the “Green-Carbon” Offset Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Sobczak & Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Andrzej Kokiel & Monika Różycka & Jacek Stasiak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Economic Conditions of Using Biodegradable Waste for Biogas Production, Using the Example of Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Jadwiga Holewa-Rataj & Mateusz Rataj & Piotr Kapusta & Joanna Brzeszcz & Marek Janiga & Anna Król, 2025. "Home Biogas Production from Organic Waste: Challenges and Process Optimization of Methane Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Małgorzata Stec & Mariola Grzebyk, 2022. "Statistical Analysis of the Level of Development of Renewable Energy Sources in the Countries of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Olkis, Christopher & Brandani, Stefano & Santori, Giulio, 2019. "Design and experimental study of a small scale adsorption desalinator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Angeliki Petridi & Dimitra-Nektaria Fragkouli & Laura Mejias & Lidia Paredes & Miquel Bistue & Christos Boukouvalas & Tryfon Kekes & Magdalini Krokida & Sofia Papadaki, 2024. "Assessing the Overall Sustainability Performance of the Meat Processing Industry Before and After Wastewater Valorization Interventions: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Bolen, T.J. & Hasan, Mahmudul & Conway, Timothy & Stéphane Yaméogo, Djigui David & Sanchez, Pablo & Rahman, Arifur & Azam, Hossain, 2022. "Feasibility assessment of biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey, grease interceptor waste and pulped food waste for WRRF," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    7. Marcin Zieliński & Marcin Dębowski & Joanna Kazimierowicz & Izabela Świca, 2023. "Microalgal Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Capture and Utilization from the European Union Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Ma, Chaonan & Liu, Jianyong & Ye, Min & Zou, Lianpei & Qian, Guangren & Li, Yu-You, 2018. "Towards utmost bioenergy conversion efficiency of food waste: Pretreatment, co-digestion, and reactor type," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 700-709.
    9. Wałowski, Grzegorz, 2024. "Pig slurry - A polydisperse substrate necessary for the biogasification of a lignite bed," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    10. Mariana Ferdeș & Gigel Paraschiv & Mariana Ionescu & Mirela Nicoleta Dincă & Georgiana Moiceanu & Bianca Ștefania Zăbavă, 2023. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion: A Way to Potentiate the Synergistic Effect of Multiple Substrates and Microbial Diversity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Zhuang, Rui & Wang, Xiaonan & Guo, Miao & Zhao, Yingru & El-Farra, Nael H. & Palazoglu, Ahmet, 2020. "Waste-to-hydrogen: Recycling HCl to produce H2 and Cl2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    12. Sarto, Sarto & Hildayati, Raudati & Syaichurrozi, Iqbal, 2019. "Effect of chemical pretreatment using sulfuric acid on biogas production from water hyacinth and kinetics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 335-350.
    13. Piotr Sulewski & Wiktor Ignaciuk & Magdalena Szymańska & Adam Wąs, 2023. "Development of the Biomethane Market in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
    14. Sayedin, Farid & Kermanshahi-pour, Azadeh & He, Quan Sophia, 2019. "Evaluating the potential of a novel anaerobic baffled reactor for anaerobic digestion of thin stillage: Effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and recycle ratio," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 975-983.
    15. Zheng, Mingbo & Zhang, Xinyu, 2025. "Digitalization and renewable energy development: Analysis based on cross-country panel data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    16. Li, Yangyang & Jin, Yiying & Li, Hailong & Borrion, Aiduan & Yu, Zhixin & Li, Jinhui, 2018. "Kinetic studies on organic degradation and its impacts on improving methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 136-147.
    17. Kamal, Md. Mustafa & Saini, R.P., 2023. "Performance investigations of hybrid hydrokinetic turbine rotor with different system and operating parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    18. Yajing He & Shihong Zhang & Dongjing Liu & Xing Xie & Bin Li, 2023. "Effect of Biomass Particle Size on the Torrefaction Characteristics in a Fixed-Bed Reactor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-14, January.
    19. A. G. Olabi & Khaled Obaideen & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem & Maryam Nooman AlMallahi & Nabila Shehata & Abdul Hai Alami & Ayman Mdallal & Asma Ali Murah Hassan & Enas Taha Sayed, 2023. "Wind Energy Contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study on London Array," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Albiona Pestisha & Zoltán Gabnai & Aidana Chalgynbayeva & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2023. "On-Farm Renewable Energy Systems: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3144-:d:1626485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.