IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2697-d1615135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Solutions for Combating Climate Change: Advancing Sustainable Energy and Consumption Practices for a Greener Future

Author

Listed:
  • Aylin Erdoğdu

    (Department of Finance and Banking, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul 34295, Türkiye)

  • Faruk Dayi

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu 37160, Türkiye)

  • Ahmet Yanik

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize 53100, Türkiye)

  • Ferah Yildiz

    (Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41350, Türkiye)

  • Farshad Ganji

    (Department of Finance and Banking, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Istanbul Arel University, Istanbul 34295, Türkiye)

Abstract

This paper investigates strategies to address climate change by promoting sustainable energy technologies and consumption practices. It examines renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and geothermal and their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The study also explores energy optimization techniques, focusing on genetic algorithms (GAs) and smart energy systems like smart grids and microgrids, which enhance energy efficiency and sustainability. The research highlights the role of the circular economy in fostering sustainable consumption through recycling and waste management. Furthermore, the paper explores the economic trade-offs between energy consumption and environmental harm, focusing on the impact of both renewable and fossil fuel energies. A dual methodological approach is employed: first, an endogenous growth model excluding environmental factors, followed by a modified version incorporating environmental considerations. Using a continuous genetic algorithm and data from 2000 to 2025, the study forecasts the optimal trajectory for renewable energy’s share in global energy consumption under two scenarios. The findings suggest that by 2025, renewable energy could represent 82.4% of the total energy consumption under environmental constraints, up from the current share of 45%. This growth is hindered by challenges like droughts, which impact hydropower production. The study concludes that achieving a sustainable energy transition requires comprehensive policies integrating renewable energy expansion, energy efficiency, and environmental protection. These findings provide important insights into optimizing energy pathways for economic growth and environmental sustainability. They also serve as a foundation for future research and policy recommendations, aiming to ensure a low emission future by balancing the need for energy consumption with the preservation of the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Aylin Erdoğdu & Faruk Dayi & Ahmet Yanik & Ferah Yildiz & Farshad Ganji, 2025. "Innovative Solutions for Combating Climate Change: Advancing Sustainable Energy and Consumption Practices for a Greener Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-39, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2697-:d:1615135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lauren E. Natividad & Pablo Benalcazar, 2023. "Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Sustainable Rural Development: Perspectives and Challenges in Energy Systems Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Aghion, Philippe & Howitt, Peter, 1992. "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(2), pages 323-351, March.
    3. Yu, Chenyang & Moslehpour, Massoud & Tran, Trung Kien & Trung, Lam Minh & Ou, Jenho Peter & Tien, Nguyen Hoang, 2023. "Impact of non-renewable energy and natural resources on economic recovery: Empirical evidence from selected developing economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory—Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1392-1402.
    5. Susmita Dasgupta & Benoit Laplante & Hua Wang & David Wheeler, 2002. "Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 147-168, Winter.
    6. Kusiak, Andrew & Tang, Fan & Xu, Guanglin, 2011. "Multi-objective optimization of HVAC system with an evolutionary computation algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2440-2449.
    7. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1403-1411.
    8. Romer, Paul M, 1990. "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(5), pages 71-102, October.
    9. Pasquale Marcello Falcone, 2023. "Sustainable Energy Policies in Developing Countries: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Sun, Hongchang & Niu, Yanlei & Li, Chengdong & Zhou, Changgeng & Zhai, Wenwen & Chen, Zhe & Wu, Hao & Niu, Lanqiang, 2022. "Energy consumption optimization of building air conditioning system via combining the parallel temporal convolutional neural network and adaptive opposition-learning chimp algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    11. Christina Vogiantzi & Konstantinos Tserpes, 2023. "On the Definition, Assessment, and Enhancement of Circular Economy across Various Industrial Sectors: A Literature Review and Recent Findings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Andreoni, James & Levinson, Arik, 2001. "The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 269-286, May.
    13. Brew-Hammond, Abeeku, 2010. "Energy access in Africa: Challenges ahead," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2291-2301, May.
    14. Du, Minzhe & Wu, Fenger & Luo, Lichun & Wang, Qiya & Liao, Liping, 2025. "Spatial effects of the market-based energy allocation on energy efficiency: A quasi-natural experiment of energy quota trading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    15. Pacesila, Mihaela & Burcea, Stefan Gabriel & Colesca, Sofia Elena, 2016. "Analysis of renewable energies in European Union," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 156-170.
    16. Christian Barika Igbeghe & Tamás Mizik & Zoltán Gabnai & Attila Bai, 2023. "Trends and Characterization of Primary Energy Sources by Energy and Food Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Alireza Karimi & Mostafa Mohajerani & Niloufar Alinasab & Fateme Akhlaghinezhad, 2024. "Integrating Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithms to Optimize Building Energy and Thermal Efficiency Under Historical and Future Climate Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    18. Kingsley Ukoba & Kehinde O. Olatunji & Eyitayo Adeoye & Tien-Chien Jen & Daniel M. Madyira, 2024. "Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial intelligence: Review and future prospects," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(7), pages 3833-3879, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Butkus, Mindaugas, 2017. "Environmental Kuznets Curve of greenhouse gas emissions including technological progress and substitution effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 237-248.
    2. George Marbuah & Ing-Marie Gren, 2015. "Carbon Emissions and Social Capital in Sweden," Working Papers 2015.14, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    3. David I. Stern, 2017. "The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 7-28, April.
    4. Anelí Bongers, 2020. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Energy Mix: A Structural Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Ricci, Francesco, 2007. "Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: A survey of the theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 688-699, February.
    6. Nicolli, Francesco & Gilli, Marianna & Vona, Francesco, 2022. "Inequality and Climate Change: Two Problems, One Solution?," FEEM Working Papers 329340, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    7. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2016. "China's pursuit of environmentally sustainable development: Harnessing the new engine of technological innovation," CCEP Working Papers 1601, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    8. Hallegatte, Stephane & Heal, Geoffrey & Fay, Marianne & Treguer, David, 2011. "From growth to green growth -- a framework," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5872, The World Bank.
    9. J. C. Sharmiladevi, 2024. "Detecting the Role of Agriculture and Industry Value Added, Energy, Capital Flow, and Openness to Trade upon Environmental Kuznets Curve for India," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 55-62, November.
    10. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2017. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth: An Assessment Based on Production and Consumption Emission Inventories," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 269-279.
    11. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2018. "Capital Accumulation, Green Paradox, and Stranded Assets: An Endogenous Growth Perspective," Working Papers 2018.33, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Sugiawan, Yogi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2016. "The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 187-198.
    13. Cameron Hepburn & Alex Bowen, 2013. "Prosperity with growth: economic growth, climate change and environmental limits," Chapters, in: Roger Fouquet (ed.), Handbook on Energy and Climate Change, chapter 29, pages 617-638, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Maxime MENUET & Alexandru MINEA & Patrick VILLIEU & Anastasios XEPAPADEAS, 2021. "Growth, Endogenous Environmental Cycles, and Indeterminacy," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2889, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    15. Maxime Menuet & Alexandru Minea & Patrick Villieu & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2020. "Economic Growth and the Environment: A Theoretical Reappraisal," DEOS Working Papers 2031, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    16. Goher-Ur-Rehman Mir & Servaas Storm, 2016. "Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth: Production-based versus Consumption-based Evidence on Decoupling," Working Papers Series 41, Institute for New Economic Thinking.
    17. Marbuah, George & Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin, 2017. "Spatial analysis of emissions in Sweden," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 383-394.
    18. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:699-715 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Enrico Maria Mosconi & Andrea Colantoni & Filippo Gambella & Eva Cudlinová & Luca Salvati & Jesús Rodrigo-Comino, 2020. "Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve: The Spatial Interaction between Economy and Territory," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, September.
    20. Simone Marsiglio & Alberto Ansuategi & Maria Carmen Gallastegui, 2016. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Structural Change Hypothesis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(2), pages 265-288, February.
    21. Timothy Swanson & Zacharias Ziegelhoefer, 2011. "Economic Frameworks for thinking about Growth, Sustainability and the role of State Intervention: Paths to Green Economies?," CIES Research Paper series 11-2012, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2697-:d:1615135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.