Climate Change Exposure and the Readability of Narrative Disclosures in Annual Reports

This study investigates the influence of exposure to climate change on the readability of narrative disclosures in annual reports. Analyzing a sample of 38,229 firm-year observations from 2002 to 2022, the study provides evidence supporting the information obfuscation hypothesis. Specifically, it finds that exposure to climate change is linked to less readable annual reports. This effect is both statistically and economically significant; a one standard deviation increase in climate change exposure leads to an 8.5% reduction in readability. Moreover, this effect is particularly evident among firms operating in environmentally sensitive industries, as well as those characterized by weak corporate culture. Additional tests indicate that the different aspects of climate change exposure (opportunity, physical, and regulatory) are individually associated with a decrease in readability of annual reports, with the physical dimension exerting the most significant impact. The findings underscore the necessity of implementing measures to mitigate climate change exposure and enhance sustainable business environments, such as transitioning to renewable energy sources (such as solar, wind, and hydro), minimizing dependence on fossil fuels, minimizing emissions from industries and transportation, sourcing low-carbon materials, adopting circular economy models, directing capital toward climate-friendly projects, and managing climate risks through catastrophe bonds and climate insurance. The significance of these actions is underscored by the impact of climate change on firms’ information environments, as documented in the current study.