IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p2286-d1606294.html

The Heterogeneity in the Relationships Between Psychological Drivers and Construction and Demolition Waste Management Intention and Behaviors Among Tunnel Construction Managers: Insights from Personality Profiles

Author

Listed:
  • Yanjie Li

    (School of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Guanfeng Yan

    (School of Engineering, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China
    School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
    Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

Abstract

Effective tunnel construction and demolition (C&D) waste management is a critical issue in the context of sustainable development, and C&D waste management measures guided by 3R principles (Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle) comply with the circular economy. In this study, an extended theory of planned behavior model based on the existing literature was proposed to identify the drivers of tunnel construction managers’ intention to implement effective waste management measures; then, the respondents were classified into four groups according to personality traits to explore the effects of personality profile on the heterogeneity in relationships between psychological drivers and C&D waste management intention and behaviors. The results show that all TPB constructs, policies, and environmental concern are significant predictors of managers’ intention to manage C&D waste properly. Then, considerable variance in the driving effects of various psychological drivers across different groups is witnessed. For the positive and temperate participants, subjective norms and policies are the most effective driving factors. However, PBC and environmental concern show a stronger relationship with the conservative and introverted participants’ intentions to adopt effective waste management measures. The findings are beneficial to developing corresponding management measures to promote effective C&D waste management.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanjie Li & Guanfeng Yan, 2025. "The Heterogeneity in the Relationships Between Psychological Drivers and Construction and Demolition Waste Management Intention and Behaviors Among Tunnel Construction Managers: Insights from Personality Profiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2286-:d:1606294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/2286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tan, Yang & Ying, Xiaoyu & Ge, Jian & Gao, Weijun & Zhang, Li & Wang, Shuai, 2024. "Driving role of perceived psychological factors in households’ low-carbon behaviors: A study based on the Chinese household carbon generalized system of preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    2. Farrow, Katherine & Grolleau, Gilles & Ibanez, Lisette, 2017. "Social Norms and Pro-environmental Behavior: A Review of the Evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    3. Hair, Joseph F. & Astrachan, Claudia Binz & Moisescu, Ovidiu I. & Radomir, Lăcrămioara & Sarstedt, Marko & Vaithilingam, Santha & Ringle, Christian M., 2021. "Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3).
    4. Zezhou Wu & Ann T.W. Yu & Chi Sun Poon, 2020. "Promoting effective construction and demolition waste management towards sustainable development: A case study of Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1713-1724, November.
    5. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    6. Lu, Weisheng & Chen, Xi & Peng, Yi & Shen, Liyin, 2015. "Benchmarking construction waste management performance using big data," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 49-58.
    7. He, Pan & Veronesi, Marcella, 2017. "Personality traits and renewable energy technology adoption: A policy case study from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 472-479.
    8. Ali Turkyilmaz & Mert Guney & Ferhat Karaca & Zhanar Bagdatkyzy & Aiganym Sandybayeva & Gulzat Sirenova, 2019. "A Comprehensive Construction and Demolition Waste Management Model using PESTEL and 3R for Construction Companies Operating in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Jiawen Cao & Jin Chen, 2021. "The Impact of an Authoritarian Personality on Pro-Environmental Behaviour for Air Pollution Mitigation through Interactions with Social Norms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Mohammad Sharghi & Hoyoung Jeong, 2024. "The Potential of Recycling and Reusing Waste Materials in Underground Construction: A Review of Sustainable Practices and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-34, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spandagos, Constantine & Baark, Erik & Ng, Tze Ling & Yarime, Masaru, 2021. "Social influence and economic intervention policies to save energy at home: Critical questions for the new decade and evidence from air-condition use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    2. Jabeen, Gul & Ahmad, Munir & Zhang, Qingyu, 2021. "Perceived critical factors affecting consumers’ intention to purchase renewable generation technologies: Rural-urban heterogeneity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    3. Chi, Yuanying & Wu, Yuxi & Zhang, Yanzhao & Wang, Zhengzao & Zhang, Mengwan & Zhang, Xufeng, 2025. "How does household engagement in the public-welfare carbon generalized system of preferences affect household carbon emissions? Evidence from ant forest and household survey data in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Murat Okumah & Julia Martin-Ortega & Paula Novo & Pippa J. Chapman, 2020. "Revisiting the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour to Inform Land Management Policy: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-33, April.
    6. Ropret Homar, Aja & Knežević Cvelbar, Ljubica, 2021. "The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Hao-Fan Chumg & Jia-Wen Shi & Kai-Jun Sun, 2019. "Why Employees Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour: The Role of Pluralistic Ignorance in Chinese Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Vu, Ha Thu & Tran, Duc & Goto, Daisaku & Kawata, Keisuke, 2020. "Does experience sharing affect farmers’ pro-environmental behavior? A randomized controlled trial in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Blankenberg, Ann-Kathrin & Alhusen, Harm, 2019. "On the determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A literature review and guide for the empirical economist," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 350, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics, revised 2019.
    10. Giménez-Nadal, José Ignacio & Molina, José Alberto & Velilla, Jorge, 2025. "Pro-environment attitudes and worker commuting behavior," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1967-1986.
    11. Kirubaharan Boobalan & Nishad Nawaz & Harindranath R. M. & Vijayakumar Gajenderan, 2021. "Influence of Altruistic Motives on Organic Food Purchase: Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Qian, Chen & Li, Fan & Antonides, Gerrit & Heerink, Nico & Ma, Xianlei & Li, Xiande, 2020. "Effect of personality traits on smallholders’ land renting behavior: Theory and evidence from the North China Plain," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Astrid Dannenberg & Gunnar Gutsche & Marlene Batzke & Sven Christens & Daniel Engler & Fabian Mankat & Sophia Moeller & Eva Weingaertner & Andreas Ernst & Marcel Lumkowsky & Georg von Wangenheim & Ger, 2022. "The effects of norms on environmental behavior," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202219, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    14. Zhang, Shanyuan & Zou, Hongyang & Yao, Ye & Feng, Kuishuang & Tian, Junfang & Liu, Diyi & Du, Huibin, 2025. "From demonstration to diffusion: Community dynamics and incentives analysis in household solar photovoltaic adoption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 333(C).
    15. Ankinée Kirakozian & Nabila Arfaoui & Lisette Ibanez & Sébastien Roussel, 2024. "The Impact of Environmental Beliefs, Personal Values, and Policy Perception on Recycling Behavior," Post-Print hal-05410159, HAL.
    16. Mi, Lingyun & Gan, Xiaoli & Sun, Yuhuan & Lv, Tao & Qiao, Lijie & Xu, Ting, 2021. "Effects of monetary and nonmonetary interventions on energy conservation: A meta-analysis of experimental studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    17. Valentina Carfora & Giulia Buscicchio & Patrizia Catellani, 2021. "Integrating Personal and Pro-Environmental Motives to Explain Italian Women’s Purchase of Sustainable Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    18. Bähr, Tobias & Bernal-Escobar, Adriana & Wollni, Meike, 2025. "Can payments-for-ecosystem-services change social norms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Hanzhang Zhan & Bon‐Gang Hwang & Lim Wei Hern Jovan, 2025. "Barriers and Strategies in Implementing Design for Disassembly and Adaptability Principles in Singapore: A Pathway to Circular Economy in the Construction Industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3858-3878, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:2286-:d:1606294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.