IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1724-d1594557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marine Zoning: A Two-Decade Bibliographic Analysis—A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Yael Shaked Mandelberg

    (School of Sustainability, Reichman University (IDC Herzliya), P.O. Box 167, Herzliya 4610101, Israel
    Department of Environment, Planning and Sustainability, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel)

  • Ziv Zemah-Shamir

    (Department of Marine Biology, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel
    Morris Kahn Marine Research Station, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel)

  • Inbar Schwartz Belkin

    (School of Sustainability, Reichman University (IDC Herzliya), P.O. Box 167, Herzliya 4610101, Israel)

  • Steve Brenner

    (Department of Environment, Planning and Sustainability, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel)

  • Shiri Zemah-Shamir

    (School of Sustainability, Reichman University (IDC Herzliya), P.O. Box 167, Herzliya 4610101, Israel)

Abstract

Marine zoning is a widely used spatial tool for managing ocean spaces, minimizing conflicts between uses, and maintaining ecosystem services. This review examines and profiles the use of marine zoning and its potential to support climate resilience and ecosystem services through a systematic PRISMA analysis of 121 articles. The findings highlight the importance of balancing sustainable resource use and human well-being with nature protection through well-tailored zoning objectives. The review underscores the need to expand research on underrepresented marine habitats such as seagrass and algae, which play a critical role in climate change mitigation. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of broadening the scope to consider human activities beyond fisheries, which are often the primary focus. Stakeholder engagement and public awareness are identified as crucial for effective marine zoning planning. A significant gap is noted in the integration of ecosystem services and natural capital into marine zoning research. Furthermore, despite marine zoning’s potential to address climate change challenges, the reviewed articles reveal limited attention to this topic, indicating an urgent need for further research. This review advocates for the incorporation of ecosystem service valuation and climate change considerations into marine zoning to ensure sustainable management that balances ecological preservation with human well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Yael Shaked Mandelberg & Ziv Zemah-Shamir & Inbar Schwartz Belkin & Steve Brenner & Shiri Zemah-Shamir, 2025. "Marine Zoning: A Two-Decade Bibliographic Analysis—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-31, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1724-:d:1594557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1724/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1724/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soroush Kouhi & M. Reza Hashemi & Malcolm Spaulding & Tetsu Hara, 2022. "Modeling the impact of sea level rise on maximum water elevation during storm surge events: a closer look at coastal embayments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    3. Lu, Shiau-Yun & Shen, Cheng-Han & Chiau, Wen-Yan, 2014. "Zoning strategies for marine protected areas in Taiwan: Case study of Gueishan Island in Yilan County, Taiwan," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-29.
    4. Grantham, Hedley S. & Agostini, Vera N. & Wilson, Joanne & Mangubhai, Sangeeta & Hidayat, Nur & Muljadi, Andreas & Muhajir, & Rotinsulu, Chris & Mongdong, Meity & Beck, Michael W. & Possingham, Hugh P, 2013. "A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, Indonesia," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 184-194.
    5. Jia, Ruru & Gao, Jinwu & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Robust ocean zoning for conservation, fishery and marine renewable energy with co-location strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    6. Maguire, Bernadine & Potts, Jonathan & Fletcher, Stephen, 2012. "The role of stakeholders in the marine planning process--Stakeholder analysis within the Solent, United Kingdom," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 246-257, January.
    7. Slater, Anne-Michelle & Irvine, Katherine N & Byg, Anja A. & Davies, Ian M. & Gubbins, Matt & Kafas, Andronikos & Kenter, Jasper & MacDonald, Alison & O'Hara Murray, Rory & Potts, Tavis & Tweddle, Jac, 2020. "Integrating stakeholder knowledge through modular cooperative participatory processes for marine spatial planning outcomes (CORPORATES)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    8. Stella Sofia Kyvelou & Dimitrios G. Ierapetritis & Michalis Chiotinis, 2023. "The Future of Fisheries Co-Management in the Context of the Sustainable Blue Economy and the Green Deal: There Is No Green without Blue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Bing Yu & Yuying Cai & Laiqun Jin & Bisheng Du, 2018. "Effects on Willingness to Pay for Marine Conservation: Evidence from Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Jenny Escandón-Panchana & Rafael Elao Vallejo & Paulo Escandón-Panchana & Andrés Velastegui-Montoya & Gricelda Herrera-Franco, 2022. "Spatial Planning of the Coastal Marine Socioecological System—Case Study: Punta Carnero, Ecuador," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    12. Chakraborty, Shamik & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Blasiak, Robert, 2020. "Multiple values for the management and sustainable use of coastal and marine ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    13. Buonocore, Elvira & Donnarumma, Luigia & Appolloni, Luca & Miccio, Antonino & Russo, Giovanni F. & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2020. "Marine natural capital and ecosystem services: An environmental accounting model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 424(C).
    14. Thomas L. Frölicher & Erich M. Fischer & Nicolas Gruber, 2018. "Marine heatwaves under global warming," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7718), pages 360-364, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yamamoto, Yuki, 2023. "Living under ecosystem degradation: Evidence from the mangrove–fishery linkage in Indonesia," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Van Schoubroeck, Sophie & Anougmar, Soukaina & Finizola e Silva, Maira & Ala-Harja, Venla & Statzu, Vania & Everaert, Gert & Watt, Lois & Barboza, Francisco R. & Compernolle, Tine, 2024. "Valuation of ecosystem services in marine protected areas: A comprehensive review of methods and needed developments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Habtemariam, Bereket Tesfamariam & Fang, Qinhua, 2016. "Zoning for a multiple-use marine protected area using spatial multi-criteria analysis: The case of the Sheik Seid Marine National Park in Eritrea," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 135-143.
    4. Sharma, Gagan Deep & Verma, Mahesh & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Gupta, Mansi & Chopra, Ritika, 2022. "Transitioning green finance from theory to practice for renewable energy development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 554-565.
    5. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    7. R. Ebrahimi & S. Choobchian & H. Farhadian & I. Goli & E. Farmandeh & H. Azadi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. repec:bdu:ojjppa:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:46-62:id:3297 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Anna Napiórkowska & Piotr Zaborek & Marzanna Katarzyna Witek-Hajduk & Anna Grudecka, 2025. "Individual Cultural Values and Charitable Crowdfunding: Driving Social Sustainability Through Consumer Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Sagarika Dey & Priyanka Devi, 2019. "Impact of TVET on Labour Market Outcomes and Women’s Empowerment in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Cachar District, Assam," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 357-371, December.
    12. Maria Sassi, 2020. "A SEM Approach to the Direct and Indirect Links between WaSH Services and Access to Food in Countries in Protracted Crises: The Case of Western Bahr-el-Ghazal State, South Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Olga Stepanova & Magdalena Romanov, 2021. "Urban Planning as a Strategy to Implement Social Sustainability Policy Goals? The Case of Temporary Housing for Immigrants in Gothenburg, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Michel, Hanno, 2020. "From local to global: The role of knowledge, transfer, and capacity building for successful energy transitions," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2020-603, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    16. Wilson Charles Wilson & Maja Slingerland & Frederick P. Baijukya & Hannah Zanten & Simon Oosting & Ken E. Giller, 2021. "Integrating the soybean-maize-chicken value chains to attain nutritious diets in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1595-1612, December.
    17. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Tao Liang & Dong Zhao & Tao Wang & Xingbin Chen, 2022. "A heterogeneous decision criteria system evaluating sustainable infrastructure development: From the lens of multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 556-579, August.
    19. Sudheesh Ramapurath Chemmencheri, 2016. "Social Protection as a Human Right in South Asia," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 10(2), pages 236-252, August.
    20. Ingrid Boas & Frank Biermann & Norichika Kanie, 2016. "Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 449-464, June.
    21. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1724-:d:1594557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.