IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1597-d1591666.html

Towards Clean Energy Transition: An Exploratory Case Study from Rural Egypt

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Abouaiana

    (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Sinai University, Kantara Branch, Ismailia 41636, Egypt)

  • Alessandra Battisti

    (Department of Planning, Design, and Technology of Architecture, Sapienza, University of Rome, Via Flaminia 72, 00196 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Rural areas are ideal for renewable energy facilities, supporting sustainable development and energy transition. Egypt aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the electricity sector by 37% and energy consumption by 17% by 2030. Rural Egypt, hosting two-thirds of the population and building stock, consumes one-third of the total electricity. Thus, this paper provides an exploratory study to diagnose and benchmark the energy-use intensity of rural buildings and quantify the correlation between residential electricity consumption, built environment elements, and socio-economic factors, in addition to promoting techno-economic assessments of renewable energy from photovoltaic panels in rural Egypt, supporting national policies amid rapid rural development. The study utilized different analytical and field methods and statistical analyses. A typical agriculture-based rural village in the Delta region, northern Egypt, was selected; the built environment, building types, and socio-economic factors were examined. The results revealed a significant correlation between lifestyle, built-up area, household size, and floor numbers with residential buildings’ electricity consumption. The average annual electricity use intensity was benchmarked at 2.5–92.3 kWh/m 2 for six non-residential building typologies and at 22 kWh/m 2 and 6.67 kWh/dwelling for residential buildings. Under current regulations, rooftop solar panels can generate electricity significantly, but are not profitable. Eventually, insights for policymakers to inform energy transition policies and national initiatives for rural regeneration were provided. The research focused on a local context, but the methodology can be applied to rural settlements in similar contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Abouaiana & Alessandra Battisti, 2025. "Towards Clean Energy Transition: An Exploratory Case Study from Rural Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-39, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1597-:d:1591666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Meng & Jin, Tianyu & Liu, Shenglong & Zhou, Shaojie, 2021. "The cost of clean energy transition in rural China: Evidence based on marginal treatment effects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Rasha Kassem & Mohamed Metwally Mahmoud & Nagwa F. Ibrahim & Abdulaziz Alkuhayli & Usama Khaled & Abderrahmane Beroual & Hedra Saleeb, 2024. "A Techno-Economic-Environmental Feasibility Study of Residential Solar Photovoltaic/Biomass Power Generation for Rural Electrification: A Real Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Ahmad, G.E., 2002. "Photovoltaic-powered rural zone family house in Egypt," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 379-390.
    4. Attia, Shady & Evrard, Arnaud & Gratia, Elisabeth, 2012. "Development of benchmark models for the Egyptian residential buildings sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 270-284.
    5. Clausen, Laura Tolnov & Rudolph, David, 2020. "Renewable energy for sustainable rural development: Synergies and mismatches," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Ahmed Abouaiana, 2022. "Rural Energy Communities as Pillar towards Low Carbon Future in Egypt: Beyond COP27," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Davis, Mark, 1998. "Rural household energy consumption : The effects of access to electricity--evidence from South Africa," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 207-217, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chygryn, Olena & Hrytsenko, Kostiantyn & Starchenko, Liudmyla & Lebid, Vadym, 2025. "Modelling the impact of biogas production capacity and industrial determinants on electricity consumption in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianling Qi & Huanjiao Li & Feng Ye & Lingjing Zhang & Tianhang Yang & Chengda Yan, 2025. "Powering Rural Prosperity: How Clean Energy Adoption Transforms Comprehensive Welfare of Rural Residents in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Siyou Xia & Yu Yang & Xiaoying Qian & Xin Xu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Interaction and Socioeconomic Determinants of Rural Energy Poverty in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Petr Hlavacek & Vladim r Skaln k, 2021. "The Implementation of Smart Energy into Transformation of the Rural Area: The Use of Public Policies for Smart Villages Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6.
    4. van der Kroon, Bianca & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter J.H., 2013. "The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 504-513.
    5. Hafiz Salami & Kingsley Okpara & Chomsri Choochuay & Techato Kuaanan & David Akeju & Manasseh Shitta, 2025. "Domestic energy consumption, theories, and policies: a systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5821-5867, March.
    6. Tian, Jianchi & Li, Yang & Sun, Yan & Yang, Bo & Chen, Xuefeng, 2024. "Warming climate apathy to mitigate the disparity in climate policy support across distinct income strata," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Wesly Jean & Marcel Bursztyn & Nelson Bernal & Antonio C. P. Brasil Junior & Gabriela Litre & Daniela Nogueira, 2024. "Linking Energy Transition to Income Generation for Vulnerable Populations in Brazil: A Win-Win Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Maes, Wouter H. & Verbist, Bruno, 2012. "Increasing the sustainability of household cooking in developing countries: Policy implications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 4204-4221.
    9. van der Kroon, Bianca & Brouwer, Roy & van Beukering, Pieter J.H., 2014. "The impact of the household decision environment on fuel choice behavior," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 236-247.
    10. Brandão de Vasconcelos, Ana & Pinheiro, Manuel Duarte & Manso, Armando & Cabaço, António, 2015. "A Portuguese approach to define reference buildings for cost-optimal methodologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 316-328.
    11. Elias Carayannis & Pantelis Kostis & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2024. "Quality Function Deployment-Oriented Strategic Outlook to Sustainable Energy Policies Based on Quintuple Innovation Helix," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6761-6779, June.
    12. Torero, Maximo, 2014. "The Impact of Rural Electrification," MPRA Paper 61425, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Paul Adjei Kwakwa & Edward Debrah Wiafe & Hamdiyah Alhassan, 2013. "Households Energy Choice in Ghana," Journal of Empirical Economics, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 96-103.
    14. Lu, Hongwei & Li, Tingting & Li, Guojing & Luo, Qiyou & Gao, Mingjie, 2025. "Digital literacy and the rural cooking energy transition: Evidence from rural China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. López, Iván & Sanagustín-Fons, Victoria & Moseñe Fierro, José A., 2026. "Social perception of renewable energies: barriers and opportunities for an inclusive energy transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Aktas, Ilter Sahin, 2024. "Techno-economic feasibility analysis and optimisation of on/off-grid wind-biogas-CHP hybrid energy system for the electrification of university campus: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PC).
    17. Zhang, Chao & Fan, Yupeng & Fang, Chuanglin, 2024. "Orderly and synergistic development of urban-rural integration based on evolutionary game model: A case study in the Jiangxi Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Olabisi, Michael & Tschirley, David L. & Nyange, David & Awokuse, Titus, 2019. "Energy demand substitution from biomass to imported kerosene: Evidence from Tanzania," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 243-252.
    19. Akpalu, Wisdom & Dasmani, Isaac & Aglobitse, Peter B., 2011. "Demand for cooking fuels in a developing country: To what extent do taste and preferences matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6525-6531, October.
    20. Jaco P. Weideman & Roula Inglesi-Lotz, 2016. "Structural Breaks in Renewable Energy in South Africa: A Bai and Perron Break Test Application," Working Papers 201636, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1597-:d:1591666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.