IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8950-d1767380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Attitudes, Awareness, and Purchase Behaviour for Certified Mountain Products in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Ancuța Marin

    (Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Steliana Rodino

    (Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 011464 Bucharest, Romania
    National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, 060031 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ruxandra-Eugenia Pop

    (Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Vili Dragomir

    (Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marian Butu

    (Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 011464 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Interest in consumer behavior regarding agri-food products is growing, particularly in the context of sustainable and local consumption. This study examines consumer perceptions of certified mountain products in Romania, with a specific focus on cow’s milk. A structured survey was conducted among 576 respondents from the Bucharest–Ilfov metropolitan area, representing the target population of regular food consumers. The data were analyzed using descriptive and comparative statistical methods in SPSS, including chi-square tests and contingency coefficients, to evaluate consumer awareness, attitudes, and their willingness to pay. The results reveal that although awareness of the “mountain product” label is high (88.9%), its direct influence on purchase decisions remains limited, with price, brand, and origin playing stronger roles. Nevertheless, 95% of respondents expressed willingness to pay a premium price, and over 70% associated mountain certification with health benefits and higher quality. These findings highlight both the potential and current limitations of certification as a market-based tool to support sustainable consumption and the economic resilience of mountain areas. The study contributes empirical evidence from a less explored national context. It offers insights for policymakers, producers, and retailers seeking to strengthen short food supply chains and consumer trust in certified labels.

Suggested Citation

  • Ancuța Marin & Steliana Rodino & Ruxandra-Eugenia Pop & Vili Dragomir & Marian Butu, 2025. "Consumer Attitudes, Awareness, and Purchase Behaviour for Certified Mountain Products in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8950-:d:1767380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8950/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8950/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Marchi, Elisa & Caputo, Vincenzina & Nayga, Rodolfo M. & Banterle, Alessandro, 2016. "Time preferences and food choices: Evidence from a choice experiment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 99-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianhua Wang & Jiaye Ge & Yuting Ma, 2018. "Urban Chinese Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Pork with Certified Labels: A Discrete Choice Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276930, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    4. Crosetto, P. & Lacroix, A. & Muller, L. & Ruffieux, B., 2018. "Nutritional and economic impact of 5 alternative front-of-pack nutritional labels: experimental evidence," Working Papers 2018-11, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    5. Marc Bénard & Margaux Robert & Caroline Méjean & Benjamin Allès & Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot & Pauline Paolassini Guesnier & France Bellisle & Fabrice Etilé & Gérard Reach & Serge Hercberg & Mathilde Touv, 2024. "The association between consideration of future consequences and food intake is mediated by food choice motives in a French adult population," Post-Print hal-04447169, HAL.
    6. Feucht, Yvonne & Zander, Katrin, 2017. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Climate-Friendly Food in European Countries," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2017(1), June.
    7. Giovanna Piracci & Fabio Boncinelli & Leonardo Casini, 2022. "Wine consumers' demand for social sustainability labeling: Evidence for the fair labor claim," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1742-1761, December.
    8. Altmann, Brianne A. & Anders, Sven & Risius, Antje & Mörlein, Daniel, 2022. "Information effects on consumer preferences for alternative animal feedstuffs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Guan, Lijun & Huang, Zuhui & Jin, Shaosheng, 2022. "Time preference and nutrition label use: Evidence from China," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    10. Kilders, Valerie & Lineback, Caitlinn & Malone, Trey & Caputo, Vincenzina & McKendree, Melissa G.S., "undated". "The Tart Cherry Market and Purchasing Preferences in the United States," Staff Paper Series 317810, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    11. Kemper, Nathan & Popp, Jennie & Nayga, Jr., Rodolfo M. & Bazzani, Claudia, . "A Query Approach to Modeling Attendance to Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(2).
    12. José A. Albaladejo-García & José A. Zabala & Gonzalo Martínez-García & José M. Martínez-Paz, 2025. "Local or Ecological? An Agri-Food Choice Experiment for Extra Virgin Olive Oil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen, 2020. "The Impacts of Young Consumers’ Health Values on Functional Beverages Purchase Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Grebitus, Carola & Davis, George C., 2017. "Change is good!? Analyzing the relationship between attention and nutrition facts panel modifications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 119-130.
    15. Bhagyashree Katare & Hyejin Yim & Anne Byrne & H. Holly Wang & Michael Wetzstein, 2023. "Consumer willingness to pay for environmentally sustainable meat and a plant‐based meat substitute," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 145-163, March.
    16. M. Matita & J. Mazalale & M. Quaife & D. Johnston & L. Cornelsen & T. Kamwanja & R. Smith & H. Walls, 2024. "Food choice responses to changes in the price of a staple crop: a discrete choice experiment of maize in rural Malawi," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Guan, L. & Jin, S. & Huang, Z., 2018. "Time Preference and Food Nutrition Information Search: Evidence from 1220 Chinese Consumers," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277205, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Ozge Dinc‐Cavlak & Ozlem Ozdemir, 2021. "Comparing the willingness to pay through three elicitation mechanisms: An experimental evidence for organic egg product," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 782-803, October.
    19. De Marchi, E. & Cavaliere, A. & Banterle, A., 2018. "Consumer choice behavior for cisgenic food: exploring attribute processing strategies and the role of time preference," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277393, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Rebecca C. A. Tobi & Francesca Harris & Ritu Rana & Kerry A. Brown & Matthew Quaife & Rosemary Green, 2019. "Sustainable Diet Dimensions. Comparing Consumer Preference for Nutrition, Environmental and Social Responsibility Food Labelling: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8950-:d:1767380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.