IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8186-d1747192.html

Assessing the Value of Ecosystem Services in Decentralized Sanitation Systems: A Case Study in a Vulnerable Mountain Area

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Felici

    (Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Lungargine Rovetta 8, 35127 Padova, Italy)

  • Giulio Corsi

    (Institute of Management, Interdisciplinary Center on Sustainability and Climate, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Serena Fabbri

    (Institute of Management, Interdisciplinary Center on Sustainability and Climate, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Monia Niero

    (Institute of Management, Interdisciplinary Center on Sustainability and Climate, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy)

  • Maria Cristina Lavagnolo

    (Department of Civil Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Padova, Lungargine Rovetta 8, 35127 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Decentralized waste and wastewater management systems represent a promising solution for enhancing resource efficiency and delivering ecosystem services, particularly in remote or environmentally sensitive areas. This study presents an economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by the AQUANOVA system, implemented at the Bosconero mountain hut in Northern Italy. The system integrates anaerobic digestion and phytoremediation for the treatment of organic waste and wastewater, applying circular economy principles. Using market-based, replacement cost, avoided cost, and benefit transfer methods, key ecosystem services were monetarily quantified. Results show the economic benefits generated by the system through renewable energy production, improved soil quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and wastewater treatment. Depending on discount rates and climate policy scenarios, the Net Present Value (NPV) of these ecosystem services over 30 years ranges from approximately EUR 33,000 to EUR 46,000. Additionally, non-monetized benefits such as biodiversity enhancement, nutrient cycling, and cultural services further reinforce the environmental relevance of the system. These findings highlight the potential of integrating ecosystem service valuation into the assessment of decentralized waste management technologies to support evidence-based environmental policies and the transition to a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Felici & Giulio Corsi & Serena Fabbri & Monia Niero & Maria Cristina Lavagnolo, 2025. "Assessing the Value of Ecosystem Services in Decentralized Sanitation Systems: A Case Study in a Vulnerable Mountain Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8186-:d:1747192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8186/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8186/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessia Amato & Konstantina Tsigkou & Alessandro Becci & Francesca Beolchini & Nicolò M. Ippolito & Francesco Ferella, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane vs. Fossil Methane Production and Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Kevin Rennert & Frank Errickson & Brian C. Prest & Lisa Rennels & Richard G. Newell & William Pizer & Cora Kingdon & Jordan Wingenroth & Roger Cooke & Bryan Parthum & David Smith & Kevin Cromar & Dela, 2022. "Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 687-692, October.
    3. Katharine Ricke & Laurent Drouet & Ken Caldeira & Massimo Tavoni, 2019. "Author Correction: Country-level social cost of carbon," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 567-567, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tarsia, Romano, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of weather shocks on firm economic performance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124251, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Böhringer, Christoph & Helm, Carsten & Schürer, Laura, 2025. "How to boost countries’ climate ambitions: Turning gains from emissions trading into gains for climate," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    3. Long, Xianling & Astier, Nicolas & Zhang, Da, 2025. "Is broader trading welfare improving for emission trading systems?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Shan, Rui & Kittner, Noah, 2025. "Sector-specific strategies to increase green hydrogen adoption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    5. In Chang Hwang & Richard S. J. Tol, 2025. "National social cost of carbon: An application of FUND," Papers 2509.03926, arXiv.org.
    6. Hazem Krichene & Thomas Vogt & Franziska Piontek & Tobias Geiger & Christof Schötz & Christian Otto, 2023. "The social costs of tropical cyclones," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Thaller, Lotta & Harding, Anthony & Saldivia Gonzatti, Ignacio & Schwingshackl, Clemens & O'Sullivan, Michael & Pongratz, Julia & Rickels, Wilfried, 2026. "Country social cost of carbon estimates and their application to assess the natural land sink," Kiel Working Papers 2316, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    8. Rickels, Wilfried & Meier, Felix & Peterson, Sonja & Rühland, Sina & Thube, Sneha & Karstensen, Johannes & Posern, Conny & Wolff, Claudia & Vafeidis, Athanasios T. & Grasse, Patricia & Quaas, Martin, 2024. "The ocean carbon sink enhances countries’ inclusive wealth and reduces the cost of national climate policies," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 307006, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    9. Robert Evan Sanders, 2024. "Dynamic Pricing and Organic Waste Bans: A Study of Grocery Retailers’ Incentives to Reduce Food Waste," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 289-316, March.
    10. Robert C. Schmidt & Moritz Drupp & Frikk Nesje & Hendrik Hoegen, 2022. "Testing the free-rider hypothesis in climate policy," Papers 2211.06209, arXiv.org.
    11. Christoph Böhringer & Carolyn Fischer & Nicholas Rivers, 2026. "Rebating Revenues from Unilateral Emissions Pricing," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 89(4), pages 1-34, April.
    12. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Alexander Alexandrovich Golub & Marek Hanusch & Bardal,Diogo & Bruce Ian Keith & Daniel Navia Simon & Cornelius Fleischhaker, 2025. "Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11114, The World Bank.
    14. Tracey Osborne & Sylvia Cifuentes & Laura Dev & Seánna Howard & Elisa Marchi & Lauren Withey & Marcelo Santos Rocha da Silva, 2024. "Climate justice, forests, and Indigenous Peoples: toward an alternative to REDD + for the Amazon," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(8), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Guariso, Giorgio & Sangiorgio, Matteo, 2019. "Multi-objective planning of building stock renovation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 101-110.
    16. Aggarwal, Raavi & Missbach, Leonard & Somanathan, E. & Steckel, Jan Christoph & Sterner, Thomas, 2025. "Negative health effects of carbon prices can outweigh the climate benefits in developing countries," EfD Discussion Paper 25-9, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    17. Idiano D’Adamo & Cinzia Daraio & Simone Di Leo & Léopold Simar, 2024. "A Flexible and Sustainable Analysis of Waste Efficiency at the European Level," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 25(4), pages 881-894, December.
    18. Schleich, Joachim & Alsheimer, Sven, 2024. "The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5 °C target?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    19. Fremstad, Anders & Paul, Mark, 2022. "Neoliberalism and climate change: How the free-market myth has prevented climate action," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    20. Yannic Rehm & Lucas Chancel, 2022. "Measuring the Carbon Content of Wealth Evidence from France and Germany," PSE Working Papers halshs-03828939, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8186-:d:1747192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.