IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/11114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Alexandrovich Golub
  • Marek Hanusch
  • Bardal,Diogo
  • Bruce Ian Keith
  • Daniel Navia Simon
  • Cornelius Fleischhaker

Abstract

Achieving global net zero carbon emissions requires stopping deforestation and making full use of tropical forests as carbon sinks. Market instruments for the sale and purchase of emission outcomes coming from Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation framework programs could play a very significant role in achieving this goal. The development of these markets has been insufficient so far: their scale as of today is much lower than what would be required to generate meaningful resources for the countries that host tropical forests, and the quality of existing instruments is generally insufficient to allow a scaling up in demand. However, efforts to improve the transparency and integrity of these instruments are accelerating, particularly around jurisdictional Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation framework programs. In parallel with these efforts, innovations in financial instruments suited for the framework’s carbon markets are also taking place, but their scale is limited so far. This paper looks beyond the current state of the framework’s carbon markets to consider a set of innovative financial instruments that would allow completing the infrastructure of emissions trading, enhancing its utility for both issuers and buyers of carbon credits in the framework’s jurisdictional programs. The paper shows how a combination of forest carbon bonds, where countries sell forward (or commit) their emission reduction outcomes, as well as call and put options can be used to de-risk and encourage early investment in jurisdictional Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation framework programs. To quantify the value of these innovations, the paper evaluates the potential scale of these instruments for the case of Brazil. The estimates suggest that the amounts that could be mobilized would represent a critical contribution to effective forest conservation. The proposed instruments and methods can be used by other tropical nations that are prepared to implement a large-scale jurisdictional program. Although the paper acknowledges that the current state of carbon markets would still not allow their deployment in the short term, the conclusion is that these instruments have significant potential, and their future development could be an impor tant contribution to the establishment of successful markets for the conservation of tropical forests.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Alexandrovich Golub & Marek Hanusch & Bardal,Diogo & Bruce Ian Keith & Daniel Navia Simon & Cornelius Fleischhaker, 2025. "Innovative Financial Instruments and Their Role in the Development of Jurisdictional REDD+," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11114, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099218405072538183/pdf/IDU-e95d2659-e653-44f8-8a63-b50201cad212.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arcand, Jean-Louis & Guillaumont, Patrick & Jeanneney, Sylviane Guillaumont, 2008. "Deforestation and the real exchange rate," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 242-262, June.
    2. Golub, Alexander A. & Lubowski, Ruben N. & Piris-Cabezas, Pedro, 2020. "Business responses to climate policy uncertainty: Theoretical analysis of a twin deferral strategy and the risk-adjusted price of carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Ayman Abdalmajeed Alsmadi & Manaf Al-Okaily & Najed Alrawashdeh & Anwar Al-Gasaymeh & Amer Moh’d Al-hazimeh & Abdulrasheed Zakari, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Bonds and Sustainable Green Energy: Evidence from the Last Fifteen Years (2007–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Timothy Cheston & Patricio Goldstein & Timothy Freeman & Alejandro Rueda-Sanz & Ricardo Hausmann & Shreyas Gadgin Matha & Sebastian Bustos & Eduardo Lora & Sarah Bui & Nidhi Rao, 2023. "Seeing the Forest for More Than the Trees: a Policy Strategy to Curb Deforestation and Advance Shared Prosperity in the Colombian Amazon," Growth Lab Working Papers 207, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    5. Pauline Deschryver & Frederic de Mariz, 2020. "What Future for the Green Bond Market? How Can Policymakers, Companies, and Investors Unlock the Potential of the Green Bond Market?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Kevin Rennert & Frank Errickson & Brian C. Prest & Lisa Rennels & Richard G. Newell & William Pizer & Cora Kingdon & Jordan Wingenroth & Roger Cooke & Bryan Parthum & David Smith & Kevin Cromar & Dela, 2022. "Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2," Nature, Nature, vol. 610(7933), pages 687-692, October.
    7. Dominique van der Mensbrugghe & Grzegorz Peszko & Alexander Golub, . "Diversification and Cooperation Strategies in a Decarbonizing World," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 34056, April.
    8. Golub, Alexander & Herrera, Diego & Leslie, Gabriela & Pietracci, Breno & Lubowski, Ruben, 2021. "A real options framework for reducing emissions from deforestation: Reconciling short-term incentives with long-term benefits from conservation and agricultural intensification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    9. Alexander A. Golub & Sabine Fuss & Ruben Lubowski & Jake Hiller & Nikolay Khabarov & Nicolas Koch & Andrey Krasovskii & Florian Kraxner & Timothy Laing & Michael Obersteiner & Charles Palmer & Pedro P, 2018. "Escaping the climate policy uncertainty trap: options contracts for REDD+," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(10), pages 1227-1234, November.
    10. Köhl, Michael & Neupane, Prem Raj & Mundhenk, Philip, 2020. "REDD+ measurement, reporting and verification – A cost trap? Implications for financing REDD+MRV costs by result-based payments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Assunção, Juliano & Gandour, Clarissa & Rocha, Rudi, 2015. "Deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon: prices or policies?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 697-722, December.
    12. Rakatama, Ari & Pandit, Ram & Ma, Chunbo & Iftekhar, Sayed, 2017. "The costs and benefits of REDD+: A review of the literature," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 103-111.
    13. Peszko,Grzegorz & Van Der Mensbrugghe,Dominique & Golub,Alexander Alexandrovich, 2020. "Diversification and Cooperation Strategies in a Decarbonizing World," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9315, The World Bank.
    14. Juliano Assunção & Clarissa Gandour & Romero Rocha, 2023. "DETER-ing Deforestation in the Amazon: Environmental Monitoring and Law Enforcement," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 125-156, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Golub, Alexander & Anda, Jon & Markandya, Anil & Brody, Michael & Celovic, Aldin & Kedaitiene, Angele, 2022. "Climate alpha and the global capital market," FEEM Working Papers 322792, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    2. Wang,Dieter & O'Reilly Gurhy,Bryan & Hanusch,Marek & Kollenda,Philipp, 2023. "Could Sustainability-Linked Bonds Incentivize Lower Deforestation in Brazil’s Legal Amazon ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10558, The World Bank.
    3. Golub, Alexander & Herrera, Diego & Leslie, Gabriela & Pietracci, Breno & Lubowski, Ruben, 2021. "A real options framework for reducing emissions from deforestation: Reconciling short-term incentives with long-term benefits from conservation and agricultural intensification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    4. Xiaohang Ren & Weichen Li & Kun Duan & Xinru Zhang, 2024. "Does climate policy uncertainty really affect corporate financialization?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 4705-4723, February.
    5. Neal, Timothy, 2024. "Estimating the effectiveness of forest protection using regression discontinuity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Merkus, Erik, 2024. "The economic consequences of environmental enforcement: Evidence from an anti-deforestation policy in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. Cisneros, Elías & Kis-Katos, Krisztina, 2024. "Unintended environmental consequences of anti-corruption strategies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Su, Chi Wei & Wei, Shenkai & Wang, Yan & Tao, Ran, 2024. "How does climate policy uncertainty affect the carbon market?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Mann, Michael L. & Kaufmann, Robert K. & Bauer, Dana Marie & Gopal, Sucharita & Nomack, Mallory & Womack, Jesse Y. & Sullivan, Kerry & Soares-Filho, Britaldo S., 2014. "Pasture conversion and competitive cattle rents in the Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 182-190.
    10. Yvonne Hargita & Lukas Giessen & Sven Günter, 2020. "Similarities and Differences between International REDD+ and Transnational Deforestation-Free Supply Chain Initiatives—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, January.
    11. Clark Lundberg & Ryan Abman, 2022. "Maize price volatility and deforestation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 693-716, March.
    12. Inese Mavlutova & Aivars Spilbergs & Atis Verdenhofs & Jekaterina Kuzmina & Ilja Arefjevs & Andris Natrins, 2023. "The Role of Green Finance in Fostering the Sustainability of the Economy and Renewable Energy Supply: Recent Issues and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
    13. Faria, Weslem Rodrigues & Almeida, Alexandre Nunes, 2016. "Relationship between openness to trade and deforestation: Empirical evidence from the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 85-97.
    14. Zhong, Qian & Zhang, Qun & Yang, Jingjing, 2025. "Can artificial intelligence empower energy enterprises to cope with climate policy uncertainty?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    15. Thomas Knoke & Nick Hanley & Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta & Ben Groom & Frank Venmans & Carola Paul, 2023. "Trends in tropical forest loss and the social value of emission reductions," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1373-1384, November.
    16. Julika Herzberg, 2019. "Protection and Profit: Empirical Evidence of Governmental and Market-based Forest Policies," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201901, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    17. Jack Baynes & Geoff P. Lovell & John Herbohn, 2021. "Psychological outcomes of REDD + projects: evidence from country case studies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, April.
    18. repec:osf:socarx:8yfr7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Qian Zhou & Feng Gui & Benxuan Zhao & Jingyi Liu & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2024. "Examining the Social Costs of Carbon Emissions and the Ecosystem Service Value in Island Ecosystems: An Analysis of the Zhoushan Archipelago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    20. Yoshihiro Zenno & Kentaka Aruga, 2022. "Institutional Investors’ Willingness to Pay for Green Bonds: A Case for Shanghai," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    21. Sébastien Marchand, 2011. "Technical Efficiency, Farm Size and Tropical Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazonian Forest," Working Papers halshs-00552981, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:11114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.